Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.kiran Alexander & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 15, 2018 + MAC.APP. 432/2016 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate + MAC.APP. 440/2016 Versus KIRAN ALEXANDER & ORS. Through: Nemo. .....Respondents .....Appellant 1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus HEMLATA ALEXANDER & ORS. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) .....Respondents The above captioned two appeals arise out of separate Awards of even date i.e. 2nd February, 2016, vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) has awarded compensation of `28,57,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to legal heirs of a Nursing Orderly - Rajesh, aged about 40 years, in a vehicular accident MAC.APP. 432/2016 MAC.APP. 440/2016 Page 1 of 7 which took place on 11th June, 2015.2. In this unfortunate accident in question, Kiran-mother of deceased- Rajesh, aged 68 years had sustained injuri...
Cdr Shruti Dhawan vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~95 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10617/2018 CDR SHRUTI DHAWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Angsuman Ojha and Mr.Rohit Pratap, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC, Mr.Harshul Choudhary, Mr.Sahil Sood and Mr.Viplav Acharya, Advocates. Cdr. Varun Singh and Lt.Cdr.Chetan Bagdi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this writ petition is to the order of the transfer of the petitioner herein who was commissioned in the Indian Army on 05.07.1999. At present, the petitioner is attached with the Headquarters Eastern Naval Command, Vishakhapatnam since 01.02.2018. It is strongly urged before us that this order of transfer is punitive in nature as the petitioner has made several complaints alleging sexual harassment by the Commanding Officer and Executive Officer,...
Ashwani vs.state ( Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3895/2018 Judgment delivered on:15. 10.2018 ASHWANI versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Adv. For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Subhash Pandey, P.S.Jagat Puri. JUDGMENT1510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.196 of 2016 under Sections 498A/354 IPC registered at Police Station Jagat Puri, Delhi, based on a settlement. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have 2.3. CRL.M.C. 3895/2018 Page 1 of 3 settled their disputes and the settlement dated 02.05.2018 has been executed between the parties.4. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 14 lakhs has been agreed to be paid by the petitioner to respondent No.2 in full and...
National Highways Authority of India vs.hindustan Contruction Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~92 * % + Date of Judgment:15. h October, 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 234/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra & Ms. versus Meenu Chandra, Advocates. ..... Appellant HINDUSTAN CONTRUCTION CO LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: Through Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Sanjeevi Sisadhari & Ms. Shrouti Arora, Advocates. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL433112018 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM.APPL433122018 (delay in re-filing) 3. This application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 4 days delay in re-filing the appeal.4. Prayer made in this application is not opposed. Accordingly, the same is allowed. Delay of 4 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 234/2018 6. The pr...
Devender Kumar & Ors. Vs.raj Bahadur Singh & Ors (Oriental Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 15, 2018 + MAC.APP. 582/2018 DEVENDER KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocate Versus RAJ BAHADUR SINGH & ORS (ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD) .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate + MAC.APP. 583/2018 1. NEETU PAL (MINOR) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocate Versus RAJ BAHADUR SINGH & ORS (THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Ravi Sabharwal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals arise out of impugned Awards of 13th December, 2017 and 24th January, 2018 vide which claim petitions of appellants have been dismissed on the ground that appellants have failed to prove that the accident in question had taken place due to rash and negligent driving of insured vehicle by its driver in an accident which MAC. APPs. 582-83/2018 Page 1 of 7 took place on 1st October, 2017. Since the groun...
Trilok Kumar Kapur & Ors vs.ish Kapur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3174/2014, I.As. 2028/2018, 12454/2018, 12455/2018 & 12456/2018 Date of decision:15. h October, 2018 TRILOK KUMAR KAPUR & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Arjun Bhaskar, Advocates. (M:9810035336) versus ISH KAPUR & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Preetjeet Singh and Mohd. Anis Rehnam, Advocates for Defendant No.1. (M:9811674091) Mr. V.P. Singh, Advocate Defendant No.3. (M:9810276825) for CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is a suit for partition filed by the legal heirs of late Shri G.R. Kapur (Shri Gurubaksh Rai Kapur) who was the owner of Plot No.D-143, Ajay Enclave, New Delhi-110018 measuring 200 square yards (`suit property).2. Late Shri Gurubaksh Rai Kapur had five sons and a daughter namely; Shri Trilok Kumar Kapur, Shri Manmohan Kapur, Shri Ish Kapur, Shri Rajinder Kumar Kapur, Shri Surinder Kumar Kapur and Smt. Urvashi Kapur. One of the sons - Shri Manmohan Kapur...
National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Chanda Allied Services
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~91 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h October, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 233/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate. versus CORAM: M/S CHANDA ALLIED SERVICES Through Mr. B.G. Sivabalamurugan with Mr. R. Karuppiah, Advocates. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL432792018 & 43281/2018 (exemptions) 1.2. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. CM.APPL432822018 (delay in filing) 3. This application has been filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 54 days delay in filing the appeal.4. Prayer made in this application is not opposed. Accordingly, the same is allowed. Delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is condoned.5. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 233/2018 6. The present appeal has been filed under Section 37 (1) (c) of the Arbitration and Co...
Rahul Raj vs.ms Deepti Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
Judgment delivered on:12.10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4670/2018 $~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RAHUL RAJ MS DEEPTI AGGARWAL versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar and Ms. Priyanka Verma, Advs. For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sandeep Chandna, Mr. Chanpreet Singh, Ms. Ikat Anand, Mr. Harinder K. Talwar, Advs. JUDGMENT1210.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 32053/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4670/2018 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 21.08.2018 whereby a pre- condition of deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs has been imposed for issuance of notice in the appeal filed by the petitioner impugning order of the Family Court under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from CRL.M.C. 4670/2018 Page 1 of 3 Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the DV Act), fixing interim maintenance.2. Lea...
Amkay Laboratories Pvt Ltd vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 12351/2009 AMKAY LABORATORIES PVT LTD versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Piyush Sharma and Mr K. G. Mishra, : Advocates. : Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr Manish : Mohan, CGSC with Ms Manisha Saroha, : Mr Waize Ali Noor, Mr Prateek Dhanka, : Ms Shruti Dutt and Mr Vikramaditya : Singh, Advocates. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a notification S.O. 1022(E) dated 1st December, 1998 issued by respondent no.2 (hereafter NPPA) fixing the ceiling price of Gentamycin Sulphate Eye/Ear Drops. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 20.01.2009, inter alia, demanding a sum of 8,98,946/- from the petitioner on account of charging a price in excess of the ceiling price fixed for the formulation in q...
Maya Devi vs.rajeshwar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h October, 2018 MAYA DEVI CS (OS) 1315/2014 Through: Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate (M-9811232930). ..... Plaintiff versus RAJESHWAR & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amol Sharma & Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Advocates for D-1 to 11 (M- 9213743613). Mr. Anant Bhushan, Advocate for D- 15 to 17 (M-8010070705). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH The impleadment sought of Tehsildar of Kapashera is permitted. I.A. Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 11387/2018 (for addition and deletion of D-18) 1. is disposed of. I.A. 7129/2018 (Under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC) 2. This is an application for seeking impleadment of the legal heirs of Defendant No.12. Admittedly, Defendant No.12 never appeared in the matter, however, her legal heirs impleaded for the sake of completeness. I.A. is allowed in the above terms. I.A. 7130/2018 (for setting aside abatement of the suit) & I.A. 7131/2018 (for delay of 300 days in filing the application) Since th...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »