Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and Ors vs.sunil Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~57 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 940/2016 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj, Ms. Gauraan, Advs with Mr. Amit Kumar, Deputy JAG. versus SUNIL KUMAR Through Ms. Usha Pandey, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The Central Government is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which allowed the respondents original application seeking quashing of an order dated 26.03.2015 transferring him to 39 Battalion, Sashastra Seema Bal, Palia, U.P.2. The brief facts are that the Special Service Bureau was an agency directly operating under the Central Government Cabinet Secretariat. It was converted into Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) in 2001 and was placed under the administrative control of Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). Later, on 20.12.2007, Sashastra W.P.(C) ...
Rajender Bajaj @ Rajendra Bajaj vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15.10.2018 CRL.M.C. 558/2018 RAJENDER BAJAJ @ RAJENDRA BAJAJ ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Mr.A.K.Pandey, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State Mr.M.K.Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. JUDGMENT1510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 2041/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 558/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.334 of 2014 under Sections 323/354B/509 IPC registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar, Delhi, based on a settlement. Parties are neighbours.2. It is alleged in the FIR that petitioner was abusing the husband of the prosecutrix and when she objected the petitioner is alleged to have abused her also and thereafter an altercation took place and he is alleged to have h...
Orangefish Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ngc Network (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~07 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. 10.2018 FAO(OS)(COMM)No.217/2018 & CM Nos.39476-77/2018 ORANGEFISH ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. .... Appellant Through : Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.S. Mittal, Mr. Ankur Manchanda, Mr. Azhar Alam and Ms. Vartika Sharma, Advs. versus NGC NETWORK (INDIA) PVT. LTD. .... Respondent Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sahil Sethi, Ms. Snehima Jauhari, Mr. Devvrat Joshi, Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri and Ms. Sneha Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. In this appeal, the order of a learned single judge granting injunctive relief in an application, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereafter referred to as the Act), filed by the respondent, i.e. NGC Network (India) Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter referred to as NGC) is impugned. The impugned order injuncted the appellant (hereafter known as Orangefish) from selling tickets bearing t...
Ms Jyoti vs.the Rms, Lajpat Nagar Colony Hospital and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~9 * + W.P.(C) 8231/2018 & 31511/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MS JYOTI Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Mr. Kapil Chawla, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus THE RMS, LAJPAT NAGAR COLONY HOSPITAL AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER1510.2018 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing an order dated 30.3.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.993/217 turning down her challenge to an order dated 19.4.2016, whereby the respondents had informed her that it was not proposed to extend her contractual appointment to the post of A Grade Staff Nurse at Lajpat Nagar Colony Hospital on expiry of her previous engagement on 16.4.2016.2. In the O.A. filed by the petitioner, she has alleged malafides against the C.M.O of the respondent/Hospital by stating that it was at his instance that she had been removed and she had filed a comp...
Punj Llyod Ltd vs.m/s Hadia Abdul Latif Jameel Co Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h October, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 211/2018 and CM No.37188/2018 PUNJ LLYOD LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr Adv with Mr Rishi Aggawala, Mr Karan Luthra, Ms Niyati Kohli, Mr Simranjit Virk and Ms Aarushi Tiku, Advs versus M/S HADIA ABDUL LATIF JAMEEL CO LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr A.S. Chandiok, Sr Adv and Mr T.K. Ganju, Sr Adv with Mr Aditya Ganju and Mr Abhishek Bhardwaj, Advs for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 25.07.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge. Since the order out of which the appeal arises is rather short, we deem it appropriate to reproduce the relevant part of the order, which reads as under:-"1. Counsel for the defendants submits that he has filed an application for recall of order dated 09th May, 2018 by which the present suit was numb...
Shri Kamdar Education Trust Rajkot vs.delhi Public School Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h October, 2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 393/2018 & I.A. 13734/2018 SHRI KAMDAR EDUCATION TRUST RAJKOT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Zafar Khurshid, Mr. Vikramaditya Singh and Mr. Aadil Singh Advocates. (M:8587010129) Boparai, versus DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vasudha Bajaj, Advocate. (M:9999621225) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH (Oral) Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the... Petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the termination notice dated 28th March, 2018 issued by the Delhi Public School Society, terminating the arrangement between it and the... Petitioner.2. The... Petitioner - Shri Kamdar Education Trust, Rajkot had entered into an agreement with the Respondent on 22nd October, 2001 by which the... Petitioner had commenced a school under the name of Delhi Public Schoo...
Karan Talwar vs.state (Nct of Delh) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~64 & 65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:15.10.2018 + + CRL.M.C. 5305/2018 CRL.M.C. 5312/2018 KARAN TALWAR versus STATE (NCT OF DELH) & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bakshi with Mr. Amitesh Singh Bakshi, Advocates. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. SI Vikram Singh, PS Rajouri Garden in Crl.M.C.5305/2018. SI Amit Kundu, PS Moti Nagar in Crl.M.C.5312/2018. Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.34395/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5305/2018 Crl.M.A.34412/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5312/2018 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5305/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5312/2018 1.... Petitioner in Crl.M.C.5305/2018 seeks quashing of FIR CRL.M.C. 5305/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5312/...
S & P Infrastructure Developers (P) Ltd & Anr. Vs.national Highways an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. 10.2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 372/2018 S & P INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS (P) LTD & ANR. Through: Mrs. Anusuya Salwan, Ms. Shreya Sharma, Ms. Nikita Salwan and Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Advs. ........ Petitioners versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ANR. Through: Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Mr. Akhil Aggarwal and Mr. Anirudh Singh, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. I have heard the arguments in the matter at great length.2. Notice in this matter was issued on 24.9.2018, when, the following observations were made and consequent directions were issued: 3. I am informed by Ms. Salwan that the Joint Venture Entity i.e. M/s R.P. Infra Projects (JV), which is joint venture of petitioner No.1 and 2 has been served with a letter dated 18.09.2018 on 22.09.2018.4. Ms. Salwan says that the Joint Venture Entity would like to respond to the same.5...
Gurcharan Singh Chadha vs.the b.d.o. (Gaon Sabha Mundka) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h October, 2018. LA.APP. 150/2016 & CM No.22011/2016 (for stay) GURCHARAN SINGH CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.B. Rai and Mr. Kartik Rai, Advs. Versus THE B.D.O. (GAON SABHA MUNDKA) & ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Shilphi Chaudhary, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 impugns the judgment and decree [dated 20th February, 2016 in LAC No.3A/12 Unique Case ID No.02401C0333142012 of the Court of the Additional District Judge-02, West]. on a reference under Sections 30&31 of the Act with respect to Award No.13/DCW/2006-07, Village Mundka in regard to Khasra No.min (0-10), 1(1-6) as per enclosed Naksha Muntzamim along with compensation of Rs.9,10,826/-.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 31st May, 2016, when notice thereof was ordered to be issued. Vide o...
Rahul Yadav vs.hans Raj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.75/2016 % RAHUL YADAV15h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manoj Yadav, Advocate. HANS RAJ versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.26432/2018 (for restoration) 1.2. No one appears for the respondent. This application is allowed and the present appeal is restored to its original number and position. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.75/2016 Page 1 of 6 RFA No.75/2016 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 5350/2016 (for additional documents), 34391/2016 (modification of order dt. 15.02.2016) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 05.12.2015 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant in the Order XXXVII CPC suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »