Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.abhinav Pandey & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 10.2018 Date of pronouncement:16. 10.2018 + LPA No.248/2018 & C.M. Nos.18034-35/2018 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY Through Ms.Ekta Sikri, Adv. with Mr.Jasbir Bidhuri, Adv. .... Appellant versus ABHINAV PANDEY & ORS Through Dr.Amit George, Adv. with Mr.Rishabh Dheer, Adv., Mr.Swaroop George, Adv. & Ms.Rajsree Ajay, Adv. for R-2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J1 The present intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 23.01.2018, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.2028/2016, allowing the captioned writ petition filed by respondent no.1 and directing the appellant/Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (hereinafter referred to as the University) to award a Gold Medal to the respondent no.1 for his remarkable LPA No.248/2018 Page 1 of 23 academic performance in the five year B.A.LL.B. (Hons.) course conducted during the academic ...
M/S Adya Global Export Inc. & Anr vs.canara Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h July, 2018 Date of Decision:16. h October, 2018 W.P. (C) No.6778/2016 & C.M. No.27868/2016 M/S ADYA GLOBAL EXPORT INC. & ANR Through: Mr.Hashmat Nabi and ........ Petitioners Ms.Farah Naaz, Advocates. versus CANARA BANK Through: Mr.Vivek Kumar Tandon and Ms.Mamta Tandon, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. This writ petition assails the order dated 09.10.2014 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (Appellate Tribunal, for short) in Appeal No.185/2014 arising from O.A. No.08/2010 (DRT-III), Delhi.2. Briefly stated, case of the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1, M/s Adya Global Export Inc., is proprietorship concern of petitioner No.2, Mrs. Sweety Kumari and was engaged in the business of exporting basmati rice.3. On 12.10.2007, the petitioner No.2 had opened a current account with Canara Bank, the respondent-ba...
Dev Kaushik & Ors. Vs.state ( Gnct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5314/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 DEV KAUSHIK & ORS versus ........ Petitioners STATE ( GNCT OF DELHI ) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Himanshu Kaushik with Mr. Harish Kaushik, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Raghuvender Verma, APP for the State. Mr. Darpan Sachdeva with Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocates for respondent No.2 with Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, AR of R-2 in person. JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1819/2015 under Section 135 Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Neb Sarai, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to a raid that had taken place in the premises of the petitioners where direct theft was found. A direct theft bill of Rs.1,94,009/- was raised. Thereafter petitioner approached the respo...
Jagjit Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
Shankar Yadav & Ors vs.yoginder Singh & Ors (The New India Assurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: October 16, 2018 + MAC.APP. 302/2017 YOGINDER SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus SHANKAR YADAV & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.9 + MAC.APP. 231/2018 YOGENDER SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus MANJEET YADAV & ANR ( THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE .....Respondents CO. LTD ) Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.2 + MAC.APP. 263/2018 SHANKAR YADAV & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus YOGINDER SINGH & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ). .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.3 MAC.APPs.302/2017, 231/2018 & 263/2018 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals arise out of common impugned 1. Aw...
Ram Gopal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$-R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h September, 2018 Date of decision:16. h October, 2018 + CRL. A. 676/2016 RAM GOPAL STATE Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate ..... Appellant (DHCLSC) versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with ASI Sanjay and Inspector Rajnikant, Narcotics Cell/Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The present appeal challenges the Judgment dated 24.05.2016 passed by the Special Judge (NDPS-02) Central District, Tis Hazari, Delhi in Sessions Case No.20/2012 convicting the Appellant under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The appeal further challenges the order dated 26.05.2016 passed by the Special Judge sentencing the Appellant to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2 lacs, and in default, to undergo Simple Imprisonment for six months for the above offence. Crl. A. No.676/2016 Page 1 2. T...
Gulab Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11198/2018 & & C.M. No.No.43471/2018 (for exemption) GULAB SINGH ........ Petitioner 1. Through : Mr.Javed Ahmed with Mr.Anis Ahmed, versus Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Mr.Shshil Kumar UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 10.05.2018, passed by Pandey, Mr.D.Sangma and Ms.Neha Sharma, Advocates with Inspector Sanjay Kumar. ORDER1610.2018 the respondent No.4/CISF denying his claim for grant of back wages for the period between 11.11.2016 to 20.12.2018, on the ground that he was out of service in this duration as a consequence of his own omission.2. The brief facts of the case are that pursuant to an advertisement issued by the respondent inviting applications for appointment to the post of ASI(Executive), the petitioner while working on the post of Constable in the CISF in the year 2014, had appl...
Suraj vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4777/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 SURAJ versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Ridhi, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. SI Ved Pal Sharma, PS Mangol Puri. Ms. Nazia Q., Advocate for complainant with complainant in person. : JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.1106/2014, under Sections 498A/4IPC and Sections Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mangol Puri, based on a settlement.2.... Petitioner is the husband of the respondent No.2. Subject FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have resolved their disputes and a Settlement Agreement dated 20.07.2018 has been executed between the parties. They are amicably residing together as CR...
Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corporation Ltd vs.a K Roy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * % + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:16. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus versus versus O.M.P. (COMM) 119/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD A K ROY O.M.P. (COMM) 120/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD A K ROY O.M.P. (COMM) 122/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD A K ROY O.M.P. (COMM) 125/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD A K ROY O.M.P. (COMM) 130/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD A K ROY O.M.P. (COMM) 133/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD A K ROY O.M.P. (COMM) 158/2016 INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD versus versus versus versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner OMP.(COMM.)119/2016 & Etc. Page 1 of 15 A K ROY Presen...
Yoginder Singh & Anr. Vs.shankar Yadav & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: October 16, 2018 + MAC.APP. 302/2017 YOGINDER SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus SHANKAR YADAV & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.9 + MAC.APP. 231/2018 YOGENDER SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus MANJEET YADAV & ANR ( THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE .....Respondents CO. LTD ) Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.2 + MAC.APP. 263/2018 SHANKAR YADAV & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus YOGINDER SINGH & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ). .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.3 MAC.APPs.302/2017, 231/2018 & 263/2018 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals arise out of common impugned 1. Aw...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »