Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Braham Prakash vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
Yogender Singh & Anr. Vs.manjeet Yadav & Anr ( the New India Assurance ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: October 16, 2018 + MAC.APP. 302/2017 YOGINDER SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus SHANKAR YADAV & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.9 + MAC.APP. 231/2018 YOGENDER SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus MANJEET YADAV & ANR ( THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE .....Respondents CO. LTD ) Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.2 + MAC.APP. 263/2018 SHANKAR YADAV & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ajay Singh and Mr. Pranay Jain, Advocates versus YOGINDER SINGH & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ). .....Respondents Through: Mr. Parveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Advocates for respondent No.3 MAC.APPs.302/2017, 231/2018 & 263/2018 Page 1 of 7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned three appeals arise out of common impugned 1. Aw...
Abhilash Kumar and Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:-"09.10.2018 Date of Decision:-"16.10.2018 + W.P.(C) 879/2018 ABHILASH KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Satyendra Kumar with Mr.Vinod Tiwari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J JUDGMENT1 The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the 16 petitioners assailing their termination from the CISF vide orders dated 04.09.2017 and 08.09.2017. The petitioners have also assailed the order dated 08.01.2018, vide which the appeal against their termination has been rejected by the respondent no.2/Inspector General (IG), CISF.2. The brief facts as culled out from the record are that pursuant to an advertisement issued in January, 2015 by the respondents, the petitioners had applied for the post of Constable (GD) in the CISF. Upon qualifying th...
Keshaw Diwakar vs.the Chairman, Staff Selection Commission & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7673/2017 and CM APPL. 31727/2017 KESHAW DIWAKAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. R.K. Chaurasia and Mr. Navin Kumar, Advocates versus THE CHAIRMAN, STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Tejaswita and Mr. Sidhant, Advocates with Mr. Feroz Khan, CISF CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner assails the report of the Review Medical Board dated ORDER1610.2018 1. 19.07.2017, passed by the respondent No.1/SSC, declaring him 'unfit' for recruitment to the post of SI in the Delhi Police, CAPFs and ASI in CISF, on account of suffering from hypertension.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as gathered from the records are that on 09.01.2016, the respondent No.1/SSC had issued an advertisement for recruitment of Sub-Inspectors in the Delhi Police, CAPFs and ASI in the CISF. The petitioner had parti...
Rockwool International a/S & Anr. Vs.thermocare Rockwool (India) Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. h October, 2018 Date of decision :16th October, 2018 ROCKWOOL INTERNATIONAL A/S & ANR. CS (COMM) 884/2017 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Peeyosh Kalra, Standing Counsel with Mr. C. A. Brijesh, Ms. Shreyosi Pal and Ms. Navya Chopra, Advocates. (M:9711742188) versus THERMOCARE ROCKWOOL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neel Mason, Ms. Sabia Vesar, Mr.Uday S. Chopra, Ms. P. Vennela and Mr. Vishesh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.As. 15262/2016 & 15263/2016 (U/O XIII A CPC) 1. The Plaintiff No.1 is a Denmark Corporation with the trade name Rockwool International A/S and its subsidiary, Plaintiff No.2 Rockwool BV is based in Netherlands. The Plaintiffs claim to be the worlds largest producers of stone wool fibre products which are environment friendly insulation products and control the temperature of indoor environment bot...
Virender Kumar vs.the Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:16. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7909/2015 & C.M. APPL159872015 VIRENDER KUMAR ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. versus THE LT. GOVERNOR, NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS ..Respondnets Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with for Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate Ms. L&B/LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 1008 square yards land comprised in Khasra No.5situated in the revenue estate of village Prehladpur Banger, NCT of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act...
Aamir Malik @ Vicky vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5315/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 AAMIR MALIK @ VICKY versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent Ms. Komal Sharma with Mr. H.R. Dhamija, Advocates. : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Bhawani, PS Patel Nagar. Mr. Rajbir Singh and Ms. Chhaya, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.34444/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5315/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.58/2015 under Sections 354A/354D/506 IPC, Police Station Patel Nagar, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 5315/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner used to follow the prosecutrix and even at some instances misbehaved with her.3. Learned counsels for the partie...
Sh. Chaman Kumar Sharma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11197/2018 & C.M.No.43470/2018 (exemption) SH. CHAMAN KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Yomesh Dutt Sharma with Mr.Ravi Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr.Ankit Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER1610.2018 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the order dated 18.02.2016 passed by the respondent no.3/Indian Navy, whereunder he has been declared medically unfit for recruitment to the post of Sailor in the Indian Navy on the ground of having keloid on his right leg.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that in May, 2015, the respondents had issued an advertisement inviting applications for recruitment of Sailors for Artificer Apprentice -139 Batch, 2016. The petitioner had applied in response to the said advertisement on 18.06.2015 and had appeared in the written ...
Kuldeep @Kannu & Ors. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3923/2018 KULDEEP @KANNU & ORS. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 ........ Petitioners Mr. Vikrant Choudhary, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for State. SI Vishnu Dutt, PS New Friends Colony Mr. Subhash Chand, Advocate for respondent No.2 to 6, with respondents in person. : JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.29332/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3923/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1/2013 under Sections 323/509/3IPC, Police Station New Friends Colony.2.... Petitioner No.1 has been produced from Tihar Jail. He is in judicial custody in some other FIR.3. Parties are neighbours. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties after th...
Nelofar Currimbhoy vs.perfalook International
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~J- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on:16. 10.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 285/2017, IA No.8762/2017 and 8734/2017 NELOFAR CURRIMBHOY Through Ms.Sumedha, Adv. ........ Petitioner PERFALOOK INTERNATIONAL versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Arjun Mitra and Ms.Jaskaran Kaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to impugn the Award dated 15.02.2017 passed by the learned Arbitrator.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is said to be a well known entrepreneur in the business of making and selling cosmetics and is the proprietor of Shahnaz Green Herbal Door. She was a tenant of shop No.7, Khan Market, New Delhi which had been taken on rent by a registered lease deed dated December 29, 2005. She was running a salon, namely, Shahnaz Hussain Herbal Door in the said suit property. After closing the said salon, the petitioner was desirous ...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »