Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar & Anr. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
Sas Hospitality Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs.surya Constructions Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. h September, 2018 Date of decision :16th October, 2018 CS (COMM) 1496/2016, I.As. 4565/2014, 8964/2014, 2523/2017 & 2524/2017 SAS HOSPITALITY PVT LTD & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Brij Bhushan Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amarjeet Singh and Mr. Uday Khanna, Advocates. (M:9540954431) SURYA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD & ORS. versus ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Anisha Mahajan, Advocate for D-1. (M:8860273364) Mr. Dhruv Surana and Mr. Ashish Choudhury, Advocates for D-2 and 3. (M:9836411111) Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. N. Raja Singh and Mr. Sumit Malhotra, Advocates for D-4, 6 to 9. (M:9871128442) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.The Plaintiff - SAS Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. (SAS) has filed the present 1. suit seeking a declaration that the allotment of shares in favour of the Defendant Nos.5 to 9 is null and void and a permanent injunction be passed from giving effect to the allotment dated 5th Octobe...
Power Grid Corporation of India vs.ls Cable
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:16. 10.2018 FAO (OS) 458/2012 POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA Appellant Through: Sh. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Pawan Upadhyay, Sh. Rajesh Chhetri, Sh. Rajeev Chhetri, Ms. Meenakshi Rawat and Sh. Srinivasan Ramaswamy, Advocates. Versus L.S. CABLE .Respondent Through: Sh. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant - Power Grid Corporation of India (hereafter PGC) challenged an award of 09.01.2010 made by the Arbitral Tribunal; the learned Single Judge rejected its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act).2. The respondent (LS Cables) is a Korean incorporated corporation with a project office in Delhi, engaged in the manufacturing, installing and commissioning of power underground cables; it has experience in many such projects in several countries. PGC is a Government company a...
Ram Phal Singh Sahu vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5331/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 RAM PHAL SINGH SAHU ........ Petitioner STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. A.V. Shukla, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Addl. PP for the State with SI Pankaj Saroha Respondent No.2 in person : JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.495 of 2017 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Nangloi, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Parties are neighbours. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties. It is alleged in the FIR that petitioner intimidated the prosecutrix.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of common relatives and members of the locality and petitioner has apologised to the respon...
Kanta Sharma vs.institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~17, 19 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11215/2018 KANTA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Garg, Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Ms. Shruti Arora, Advs. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay + W.P.(C) 11248/2018 Gupta, Adv. for R-1. AND SANTOSH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sharma and Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advs. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay Gupta, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 11266/2018 SANJIB SANGHI Through: Mr. ........ Petitioner Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Arjun Asthana, Mr. Soayib Qureshi and Mr. Devender Jain, Advs. Versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay Gupta, Advs. W.P.(C) Nos.11215/2018, 11248/2018 & 11266/2018 Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1610.2018 % CM No.43586/...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.m/s Ravi Builders
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$-29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 10.2018 + OMP (COMM.) 545/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION........ Petitioner Through Ms.Renu Gupta, Standing counsel. versus M/S RAVI BUILDERS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Moni Cinmoy, Mr.Arvind Kr. Pandey, Mr.Avinash Mishra and Mr.Ajay Tiwary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 16.03.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Work Order dated 22.12.2006 read with Agreement dated 15.01.2007 by which the petitioner had awarded the work of construction of Multi storeyed School Building, Turkman Gate (Balance Work), S.P. Zone, Delhi to the respondent. The summary of the Award is reproduced OMP (COMM.) No.545/2016 Page 1 herein...
Renu Aggarwal & Anr vs.baldev Raj Sachdeva
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h October, 2018. RFA4742017 RENU AGGARWAL & ANR Through: Mr. G.P. Singh, Adv. ..... Appellants versus BALDEV RAJ SACHDEVA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Luthra, Ms. Rema Luthra and Mr. Deepak Lohchab, Advs. AND RSA302018 & CM No.6311/2018 No.17963/2018 (under Section 151 CPC for directions). (for stay) and CM RENU AGGARWAL & ANR Through: Mr. G.P. Singh, Adv. ..... Appellants versus BALDEV RAJ SACHDEVA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Luthra, Ms. Rema Luthra and Mr. Deepak Lohchab, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 RFA No.474/2017 has been preferred against the judgment and decree [dated 15th February, 2017 in CS No.57755/2016 of the Court of the Additional District Judge-I (North)]. of dismissal of application of the appellants/defendants for leave to defend the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.21,84,400/-...
Rakesh Kumar Crpf vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.jds Apparels Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 67/2017 Reserved on:27. 09.2018 Date of decision :16. 10.2018 TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rahul Sharma & Mr.Jitender Rath, Advs. versus JDS APPARELS LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Pulkit Deora, Adv. for Official Liquidator. Mr.Ajay Kohli & Ms.Bhumika Kapur, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') challenging the Arbitral Award dated 03.06.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Lease Agreement dated 08.04.2009 executed between the parties for leasing out certain portion/area in the commercial complex and entertainment centre named as 'North-Orbit Plaza' as also the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 08.04.2009 executed between the parties with resp...
Deepak Kapil & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5088/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 DEEPAK KAPIL & ORS Through versus ........ Petitioners STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. M.A. Niyazi with Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. Mr. Brij Kishore Prasad, Advocate for respondent No.2. SI Parveen Badaru, EOW. : JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33589/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5088/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.73/2017, under SectionsIPC, Police Station Economic Wing, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 5088/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR was registered on a complaint by Smt. Ved Kapil contending that she had invested money with a company of which petitioner No.1, who is her relative was one of the Dir...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »