Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mmtc Ltd. Vs.m/s Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (Coal Sales) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. 8.2018 Judgment pronounced on:31. 10.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) No.193 of 2017 MMTC LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikram Vipin Mehta, Mr. Saurobroto Dutta, Mr. Vinayak Batta, Advs. versus M/S KARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS. (COAL SALES) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev K. Virmani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jyoti Prakash Sahu and Mr. Rishabh Bhargava, Advs. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This petition is directed against an unanimous award dated 7.1.2017. By virtue of the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has allowed all three claims preferred by the respondent along with interest.2. The details as to the nature of the claims, the amounts awarded against them and the interest directed to be paid against each of the claims along with the period for which interest is payable is set forth hereafter: OMP (COMM) No.193/2017 Page 1 of 46 Claim Nature of the...
Parsvnath Developers Limited & Anr. Vs.rail Land Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$-6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. 10.2018 ARB.P. 724/2018 & IA149992018 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Ciccu Mukopadhyay, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay Nair, Mr.Saurav Agrawal, Mr.Shubham Paliwal, Mr.Kapil Rustogi, Ms.Aakriti Dawar, Mr.Vibhu Anshuman, Advs. versus RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Shaurya Sahay, Mr.Avijit Mani Tripathi, Kumar Abhishek, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of a nominee Arbitrator on behalf of the respondent for constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Development Agreement Arb. P. No.724/2018 Page 1 dated 31.05.2013 executed between the parties.2. The Arbitration Agreement is contained...
Sarita & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$~9 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"31st October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4590/2015 and Crl.M.A.16437/2015 SARITA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vipin Nandwani, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with ASI Prem Ram Arya, PS Hari Nagar. Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.582/2013 was registered by Police Station Hari Nagar on 29.11.2013 on the complaint of the second respondent (the complainant), it involving allegations against the petitioners of they having committed offence punishable under Section 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). As per the case set out in the said FIR, the complainant had been induced, pursuant to false representation made by the petitioners, to part with money in the total sum of Rs.20,60,000/- fraudulently and with dishonest intention by the petitioners acting in...
Vikas Sidhu vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t October 2018 Decided on:31. t October 2018 + CRL.A. 218/2018 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 311/2018 JOGINDER @ MINTU ...Appellant Through: Mr. Hans Raj Singh, Advocate THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ....Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI versus Bhagat Singh, PS Ashok Vihar. Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Mr. Abhimanyu Kampani, Mr. Abhishek Shrivastava, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Mr. Ankur Rai, Mr. M.A. Karthik, Mr. Yuvraj Nain & Mr. Manish Phogat, Advocates for the Complainant. + CRL.A. 319/2018 & CRL.M.(B) 446/2018 VIKAS CHAUDHARY ...Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Burman, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Harnal, Ms. Tanya Harnal, Mr. Sahil Verma and Ms. Sadhvi Gaur, Advocates. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ....Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI versus Bhagat Singh, PS Ashok Vihar. Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Mr. Abhimanyu Kampani, Mr. Abhishek Shrivastava, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Mr. Ankur Rai, Mr. M.A. Karthik, Mr. Yuvraj Nain & Mr. Manish Phogat...
Dr. Abdul Sattar vs.jamia Millia Islamia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$~50 * + W.P.(C) 10550/2018 & CM APLL.41178/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved:29. h October, 2018 Pronounced on:31. t October, 2018 versus ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Pratishtha Vij, Advocate. DR. ABDUL SATTAR JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT1 Through the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the JUDGMENT Through : Ms.Zeba Khair and Ms.Shivambika, Advocates. ..... Respondent order dated 28.05.2018 passed by the Registrar of respondent/Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University) whereby the representation of the petitioner has been dismissed by stating that the petitioner has to retire at the age of 60 years as per the rules and norms applicable to the post of Evaluator.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed to the post of Evaluator (Urdu) in the Urdu Correspondence Course- Centre for Distance and Open learning vide appointment letter dated 08.12.2004, on basic pay of INR5500per month in addi...
Modi-Mundipharma Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 11802/2016 and CM Nos. 8215/2017, 8217/2017 and 19029/2017 MODI-MUNDIPHARMA PVT. LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Navpreet Singh Ahluwalia, Mr Salil Seth, Mr Pradeep Chhindra and Mr Adhesh Sharma. : Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Ms Ruchi Jain and Mr Saeed Qadri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is a Pharmaceutical Company and has filed the present petition impugning the Standing Order No.1687 (E) dated 09.05.2016 (hereafter the impugned notification) passed by the Assistant Director, National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (hereafter NPPA) to the extent that it includes the formulation, TRD Contin 100 mg. tablet CR10(hereafter the Formulation), within the scope of th...
K M Yadav vs.management of Jhabban Lal Dav Sr Secondary Public School ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$~8 & 16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6032018 versus ..... Appellant (appearance not given). Through: Counsel for the Appellant MANAGEMENT OF JHABBAN LAL DAV SR SECONDARY PUBLIC SCHOOL K M YADAV & ANR + ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Ralli with Mr.Bibhash K.Sharma & Mr.Amber Sachdeva, Advocates. Ms.Rashmi Chopra with Ms.Vriti Anand, Advocates for R2. LPA3212018 & C.M. APPL.24187/2018 K M YADAV ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr.Sanjeev Ralli with Mr.Bibhash K.Sharma & Mr.Amber Sachdeva, Advocates. MANAGEMENT OF JHABBAN LAL DAV SR SECONDARY PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Through: Counsel for the... RESPONDENTS (appearance not given). % JUDGMENT31 10. 2018 LPA Nos. 603 & 321 of 2018 Page 1 of 14 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals - one by the Management of Jhabban Lal DAV Sr Secondary Public School (hereafter the School) and the other by K.M.Yadav (hereafter the employee) - are directed again...
Radhey Shyam & Anr. Vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. t October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5437/2012 $~4 * % RADHEY SHYAM & ANR. Through: Mr.Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Renu Gupta, Standing Counsel for NDMC/R-1. Mr.Ashish Verma, Advocate respondent No.2/BSES Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, Standing Counsel for DUSIB. Mr. Navneet Kumar, Mr. Vikas Bhadana, Advocates for R-4. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are seeking compensation for death of his son, Amit Kumar by electrocution in a public park on 12th July, 2010.2. On 12th July, 2010, Master Amit Kumar aged about 13 years was playing in Shiv Park at Punjabi Basti, Baljeet Nagar, Anand Parbat near his residence when he received electric shock from the metallic fencing erected around high mast pole which resulted in his death. The police registered F.I.R. No.47/2010 under Section 304A/337 IPC at P.S. Anand Par...
M/S. Metro Bearings vs.mrs. Faizunnisa & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
$~120 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:31. 10.2018 RC. REV. 513/2018 CM No.45716-45717/2018 M/S. METRO BEARINGS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Alamgir, Advocate. versus MRS. FAIZUNNISA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL CM No.45717/2018 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.2. RC. REV. 513/2018 & CM No.45716/2018 3. The impugned order dated 31.05.2018 passed by the Court of the learned Additional Rent Controller (Central) Delhi (ARC) allowing the eviction petition filed by the respondents against the petitioner under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act) is the subject matter of challenge in this revision petition filed under Section 25-B (8) of DRC Act.4. The respondents sought ejectment of the petitioner from the suit property used as a godown on the ground floor bearing No.2190, RC. Rev. No.513/2018 Page 1 of 6 Mohalla Rodgran, Lal Ku...
Tower Vision India Private Limited vs.the Commissioner of Central Exci ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
* + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 07.2018 Pronounced on:31. 10.2018 CEAC132016, C.M. APPL.37208/2016 VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED Appellant COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, DELHI ..... Respondent versus CEAC62017, C.M. APPL.6902/2017 & 37758/2017 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, AHMEDABAD . Appellant M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED ..... Respondent versus CEAC42018, C.M. APPL.3649/2018 VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED Appellant COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, DELHI ..... Respondent versus Appellant Appellant SERTA142016, C.M. APPL.45647/2016 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX NEW DELHI ..... Respondent SERTA152016 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX NEW DELHI ..... Respondent SERTA162016 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX NEW DELHI .... Respondent SERTA172016 INDUS TOWERS LIMITED versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX NEW DELHI .... Respondent SERTA182016, C.M. APPL.33...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »