Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Daya Ram vs.sh. Kehar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SH. DAYA RAM SH. KEHAR SINGH RFA No.856/2018 Through: versus Through:16. h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.43442/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.856/2018 and C.M. No.43441/2018(stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 03.07.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 20 lakhs given RFA No.856/2018 Page 1 of 9 by the respondent/plaintiff to the appellant/defendant as a loan, and this loan amount was secured by the appellant/defendant vide cheque No.013992 dated 05.03.2011, and this cheque was dishonoured resulting in the filing of the subject suit.3. The facts...
V.k. Dewan & Co. Vs.delhi Jal Board & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 43/2017 V.K. DEWAN & CO. Through: Mr. Shashi Dewan, of... Petitioner in person. (M:9810111765) ........ Petitioner partner versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, ASC for DJB Adhikary, Krishanu with Mr. Advocate. (M:9654074250) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) Present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation 1. Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 18th June, 2008 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. Brief background is that the... Petitioner was awarded a work order No./Supply order No.F8(5) EE(W)C-VII/2000/1497 dated 7th August, 2000. Completion certificate was given to the... Petitioner on 1st March, 2005. Disputes arose between the parties and a Sole Arbitrator was, accordingly, appointed on 16th December, 2005.... Petitioner had challenged the appointment of Arbitrator before this Court. Howe...
Sunil Gandhi & Anr. Vs.a.n. Buildwell Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~J * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement Pronounced on:16. 10.2018 CO.APPL.(M) 115/2016 and CA3322018 SUNIL GANDHI & ANR. ..... Applicants Through Mr.Bhavit Yadav and Mr.Kushal Mangal, Advs. for P-1/Mr.Sunil Gandhi Mr.Arvind K.Nigam,Sr.Adv. with Mr.Maninder Singh, Ms.Smriti Asmita, Mr.Mikhil Sharda and Mr.Mehtaab Singh Sandhu, Advs. for applicant No.2/Maj. S.K. Hooda Versus A.N. BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ajit Warrier, Mr.Angad Kochhar, Ms.Bani Brar, Advs. for Spirewoods Residents Association in CA39672016 Mr.Nanju Ganpathy, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Shlok Chandra, Mr.Ritesh Kumar Sharma and Mr.Santosh Agarwal, Advs. for Alpha Corp. Mr.K.K.Sharma, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Gagandeep Chauhan, Adv. for Surender Hooda. Mr.Vivek Kohli, Mr. Sandeep Bhuraria, Ms.Yeshi Rinchhen, Mr.Nudit Gupta, Mr. Nikhil Mathur and Ms.Nikita Batra, Adv. for ex-directors/propunder Mr.Amarjit Singh Monga, Adv. for FOSECA Mr.Sandeep Agaarwal, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Puja Jain, Adv. for SELFC M...
Manoj Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
Ved Prakash Alias Kalu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$-R-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 29th September, 2018 Date of decision:16. h October, 2018 + CRL. A. 627/2017 VED PRAKASH alias KALU ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate STATE versus ..... Respondent Farooqi, Adv. Through Mr.G.M. alongwith Narinder Sehrawat, ISC Crime Branch, Chankya Puri SI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This appeal has been filed challenging the Judgment dated 27.02.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02 (East)/Special Judge (NDPS), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.5convicting the appellant under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as Act). The appeal further challenges the order dated 06.03.2017 passed by the Special Judge (NDPS) sentencing the appellant to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment (RI) for a period of ten years with a fine of Rs. 1 lakh; in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI of one year.2. It is the case ...
Nitin Ranjan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5343/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 10.2018 NITIN RANJAN & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Trisha Mittal, Adv. along with petitioners Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Asha Singh Ms. Aparajita Sinha, R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 34538/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5343/2018 & Crl. M.A. 34537/2018 (stay) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.460 of 2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 5343/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.1 & 4 being residents of America could not be personally present. They have filed the petition through their special ...
Francis Gill vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 CRL.M.C. 5338/2018 FRANCIS GILL versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. ........ Petitioner ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.Arvind Vashishta, Adv. : Mr. Ashish Dutta, Addl. PP for the State Mr.Harish Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 34518/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5338/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.94 of 2017 under Sections 354/354A/506 IPC registered at Police Station I.G.I.Airport, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix was employed in the organisation where the petitioner was also working as a General Manager. It is alleged that the petitioner used to misbehave with her off and CRL.M.C. 5338/2018 Page 1 of 2 on consequent to w...
Sanjib Sanghi vs.the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~17, 19 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11215/2018 KANTA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Garg, Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Ms. Shruti Arora, Advs. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay + W.P.(C) 11248/2018 Gupta, Adv. for R-1. AND SANTOSH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sharma and Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advs. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay Gupta, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 11266/2018 SANJIB SANGHI Through: Mr. ........ Petitioner Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Arjun Asthana, Mr. Soayib Qureshi and Mr. Devender Jain, Advs. Versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay Gupta, Advs. W.P.(C) Nos.11215/2018, 11248/2018 & 11266/2018 Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1610.2018 % CM No.43586/...
Rajesh Kumar Verma & Anr vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~81 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO332015 Decided on:-"16th October, 2018 RAJESH KUMAR VERMA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. R. Malhotra with Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Though, arguments have already been addressed on 15.10.2018 on behalf of either side, time had been sought on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent to produce the judgment in relation to reliance placed on the verdict of Supreme Court in Union of India v. Rina Devi (AIR2018Supreme Court 2362) to contend that the amount of compensation payable, if payable, has to be computed as payable from the date of accident, which, it was submitted on the said date, as per the Schedule to Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 would be Rs. 4 lakhs with interest to be paid thereon.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants have assailed the impugned judgment of the learned Pri...
Surender Singh vs.lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. h October, 2018 W.P.(C) 9603/2015 SURENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate. versus LT. GOVERNOR, NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B / LAC. Mr. Akash Yadav with Ms. Beeashaw N. Soni, Advocates for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 400 square yards land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.38/10, situated in the revenue estate of village Prehlad Pur Bangar, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2013 Act') as ne...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »