Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Managment of Hindustan Times Ltd vs.aita Ram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on 24th September, 2018 Judgment Pronounced on 16th October, 2018 LPA5292018 MANAGMENT OF HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD Through : Dr.Abhishek ..... Appellant Manu Singhvi, Mr.Sandeep Sethi and Mr.Raj Birbal, Senior Advocates with Mr.Raavi Birbal, Ms.Meghna Mishra, Mr.Ankit Rajgahiya, Mr.Naman Joshi, Ms.Riya & Mr.Raghuveer Kapur, Advocates $~ * % + versus AITA RAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mishra and Mr.Rajnish Kumar Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 27.08.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (C) 5607/2016 whereby the petition of the appellant herein has been dismissed and the appellant has been directed to implement the award dated 23.01.2012.2. The matter was first listed on 12.09.2018, a preliminary objection was raised by counsel for the respondents that th...
Omokhosio vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1335/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 OMOKHOSIO ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Mr. B.C. Tyagi with Mr. Y.S. Chauhan and Ms. Jitendra Kaur, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State. SI Rajesh Kumar, PS Mehrauli. JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.148/2018 under Section 3IPC, Police Station Mehrauli, District South. Subsequently, Section 14 Foreigners Act has been added.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the information was received that someone had been beaten. The Duty Officer went to the hospital Bail Appln. No.2116/2018 Page 1 of 4 and found the injured. No name was disclosed by the injured at that time. In his subsequent statement he is alleged to have named the petitioner.3. Learned counsel ...
Nidesh Malik & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5320/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 NIDESH MALIK & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Urmila Yadav with Ms. Madhu Hooda, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. ASI Aman Kumar, PS CWC, Nanakpura Respondent No.2 in person. : JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.34463/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5320/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.121/2017 under Sections 498/4IPC, Police Station Crime (Women) Cell, Nanakpura.2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 5320/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits...
Sharavan Yadav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
Santosh Kumar vs.institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~17, 19 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11215/2018 KANTA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Garg, Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Ms. Shruti Arora, Advs. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay + W.P.(C) 11248/2018 Gupta, Adv. for R-1. AND SANTOSH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sharma and Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advs. INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay Gupta, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 11266/2018 SANJIB SANGHI Through: Mr. ........ Petitioner Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Arjun Asthana, Mr. Soayib Qureshi and Mr. Devender Jain, Advs. Versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pooja Saigal and Mr. Akshay Gupta, Advs. W.P.(C) Nos.11215/2018, 11248/2018 & 11266/2018 Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER1610.2018 % CM No.43586/...
Govt of n.c.t of Delhi vs.m/s Yasikan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :28. h September, 2018 Date of decision:16th October, 2018 O.M.P. 639/2008, I.As. 8293/2018 & 8294/2018 GOVT OF N.C.T OF DELHI Through: Ms. Jyoti ........ Petitioner Taneja, Advocate. (M:9999500069) M/S YASIKAN ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narang, Advocate. (M:9810064624) $~ * + CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.I.A. No.8294/2018 (delay of 21 days in filing restoration application) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 21 days in filing the restoration application being I.A. No.8293/2018. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is condoned. I.A. is disposed of. I.A. No.8293/2018 (restoration of OMP6392008) This is an application seeking recall of order dated 2nd December, 2. 2016, whereby OMP6392008 was dismissed for non-prosecution. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, and OMP6392008 is restored. I.A. is dispos...
Cement Corporation of India Ltd vs.steel Authority of India Ltd. (Sail ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$-35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. 10.2018 + OMP (COMM.) 438/2018 CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD......... Petitioner Through Mr.Jainendra Maldahiyar, Adv. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. (SAIL).... Respondent Through Mr.Santosh Kumar and Mr.Shivam Parihar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) I.A. No.14375/2018 (Delay) This is an application seeking condonation of ten days delay in re-filing of the petition. For the reason stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the application stands allowed. I.A. No.14376/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. OMP(COMM) 438/2018 & I.A. No.14374/2018 (Stay) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated OMP (COMM.) No.438/2018 Page 1 17.05.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had aris...
M/S Orchid Salon Services Pvt Ltd vs.pradyuman Kumar Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~37 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:16. hOctober, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 238/2018 & CM No.43512/2018 M/S ORCHID SALON SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Manali Singhal, Ms.Shreya Singhal, Ms.Vinita Sasidhar, Mr.Tanveer Oberio and Mr.Deepak Rawat, Advocates. PRADYUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rahul Gupta, Mr.V.K. and Mr.Shekdhar Gupta, Advocates for R-1 to 4. Jain CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM No.43513/2018 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CAV9612018 1. Mr.Rahul Gupta, counsel for the respondents No.1 to 4 enters appearance. Accordingly, caveat petition stands disposed of.2. Counsels for the parties submit that all necessary pleadings and documents on which they wish to rely upon form part of this appeal. FAO(OS) (COMM) 238/2018 & CM No.43512/2018 3. The present appeal is ...
Ritnand Balved Education Foundation vs.ranchhod M Shah & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h September, 2018 Date of decision :16th October, 2018 RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION CS (COMM) 236/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. Rajan Chawla & Mr. Shyam Singh, Advocates (M- 9899649343). versus RANCHHOD M SHAH & ORS $~ * + ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Mr. Rahul Vidhani & Mr. Ashish Singh, Advocates (M-9811083706). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking injunction restraining 1. use of the name AMITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL i.e. Defendant No.6 by Defendant No.5 - Gyanoday Educational & Medical Trust. Defendants No.1 to 4 are the trustees of the Defendant No.5s Trust. The case of the Plaintiff is that it started its first school by the name of 2. AMITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL in 1991 in Saket, New Delhi. Over the years, it has established several schools under the name of AMITY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL. Apart from this, the P...
Deepak Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5316/2018 Judgment delivered on:16.10.2018 DEEPAK SINGH ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Amit Rathore with Mr. Yashasvi Tandon, Mr. Sunny A. and Mr. Himanshu Khokar, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. SI Navdeep, PS Kamla Market. Mr. Suman Sirohi, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. : JUDGMENT1610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.34446/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5316/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.181/2016 under Sections 354(A)(1)/354(B)/354(D)(1)/341/506 IPC, Police Station Kamla CRL.M.C. 5316/2018 Page 1 of 3 Market, based on a settlement.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix was known to the petitioner as they earlier studied tog...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »