Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Chaudhary vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + CRL. A. 535/2015 1. MAHESH CHAUDHARY Judgment reserved on:30. 07.2018 Judgment delivered on:22. 10.2018 ....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Mr. Honey Khanna and Mr. Ravi Rai, Advocates. STATE ....Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with versus Ms.Priti, Advocate. Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Faraz Maqbool and Ms. Rupali Saumel, Advocates for complainant. + CRL. A. 774/2015 2. RAJESH CHAUDHARY ....Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. STATE ....Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with versus Ms.Priti, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Faraz Maqbool and Ms. Rupali Saumel, Advocates for complainant. CRL.As. 5& 7Page 1 of 46 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGEMENT2210.2018 I.S.Mehta, J.1. The Appellant Mahesh Chaudhary and Rajesh Chaudhary have preferred two separate appeal i.e. (Crl. A. 535/2015 & Crl. A. 774/2015) under Section 374 Re...
Areness Foundation vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 19, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 22, 2018 ........ Petitioner ARENESS FOUNDATION Through: Ms. Sanya Kapur, Adv. + W.P.(C) 9123/2018 versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel ........ RESPONDENTS for GNCTD with Mr. Chirayu Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In the above facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the petition of the petitioner thereby: that i. Passing a writ of certiorari or any other writ or order thereby quashing aside No.F.1 (92) / Regn. Br./Div.Comm./HQ/2012/PF-II/1196 dated 13/07/2016 passed by the Inspector General of Registration; and ii. Setting aside all such orders, proceedings and inquiries emanating out of the aforesaid...
Food Corporation of India, Moga vs.ravindra Trading Co., Badhni & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d October, 2018 O.M.P. 576/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, MOGA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate. (M:9811537909) versus RAVINDRA TRADING CO., BADHNI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) Present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation 1. Act, 1996 (the Act) has been filed challenging the award dated 8th February, 2012 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator with the aegis of the Indian Council of Arbitration. Disputes arose out of an agreement dated 18th October, 1994 which 2. was entered into between the... Petitioner and the... RESPONDENTS. The same relates to milling of paddy, which was to be done by the... RESPONDENTS. Disputes had arisen between the parties and FCI had invoked arbitration and raised claims against the... RESPONDENTS. Operative portion of the award is set out herein below: The claimant ...
Chairman Union Public Service Commission & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"22nd October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 4922/2015 & Crl.M.A. 17628/2015 CHAIRMAN UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Ravinder Agarwal & Mr. Gaurav Ahlawat, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State. Ms. Naomi Chandra, Adv. for R-4 with R-4 in person. Mr. Deepak Anand, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second to sixth respondents had joined together to submit an application seeking direction for registration of first information report invoking the jurisdiction of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM), New Delhi under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The said application presented on 21.01.2013 was made over to Metropolitan Magistrate who registered it as criminal complaint case (CC No.05/01/2013). She examined the matter arising out of the sa...
Dr. o.p. Nimesh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: October 05, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 22, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2466/2017 DR. O.P. NIMESH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nalin Kohli, Adv. with Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Adv. and Ms. Nimisha Menon, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash CGSC, Mr. Farman Ali and Mr. Varun Pathak, Advs. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated February 26, 2016 whereby, officers junior to the petitioner have been promoted to the rank of IG (Medical) and also order dated 23rd January, 2017 rejecting the petitioners representation, with a further prayer directing the respondents to hold a review DPC with reference to the DPC of 25th February, 2016 by ignoring the remarks and grading given by the petitioners Technical Reviewing Officer and thereafter petitioner may be ...
Food Corporation of India, Ferozepur vs.m/s Shiv Shanker Rice Mills an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d October, 2018 O.M.P. 346/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, FEROZEPUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate. (M:9811537909) versus M/S SHIV SHANKER RICE MILLS AND PARTNERS FEROZEPUR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocate. (M:9891675255) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH The present petition under Section 34 of Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) has been filed challenging award dated 15th November, 2011 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator under the aegis of the Indian Council of Arbitration. The disputes arose out of agreement dated 26th April, 1995 which was 2. entered into between the... Petitioner and the... RESPONDENTS. The same relates to milling of paddy, which was to be done by the... RESPONDENTS. The Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) had i...
Raj Bala & Anr vs.sumit Dahiya & Ors (M/S United India Insurance Co. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~ * % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d October, 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 462/2018 RAJ BALA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Neha Jain and Mr. Luv Manan, Advocates versus SUMIT DAHIYA & ORS (M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate JUDGEMENT The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.23,38,000/- has been awarded to the appellants.2. On 28th December, 2012 at about 8:15 A.M, Manish Kumar was going on a motorcycle in front of Kali Mata Mandir, Main Bawana Road, Delhi when he was hit by a DTC bus bearing No.DL-1 PC0113 The accident resulted in death of Manish Kumar. The police registered FIR No.465/2012 dated 28th December, 2012 under Sections 279/304A of IPC against the driver of the DTC bus.3. The deceased aged 21 years at the time of accident, was a final year student of B.Tech. at Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak. Th...
Sony Corporation vs.mr. Suresh Kaouromal Gambani and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
11 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1187/2018 & I.As. 14391-14396/2018 SONY CORPORATION ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Anradha Salhotra, Advocate with Mr. Sumit Wadhwa, Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia and Ms. Animika Majumdar, Advocates. versus MR. SURESH KAOUROMAL GAMBANI AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Mr. Ashish Singh and Ms. Elisha Kumari, Advocates with defendant No.1 in person. Date of Decision:22. d October, 2018 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, accounts of profits under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.2. It is averred in the plaint that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of trade mark SONY in around 193 jurisdictions in the CS (COMM) 1187/2018 Page 1 of 4 world including in India where the said mark is registered in various Classes under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.3. It is ...
Mahesh Chaudhary vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + CRL. A. 535/2015 1. MAHESH CHAUDHARY Judgment reserved on:30. 07.2018 Judgment delivered on:22. 10.2018 ....Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Ms. Santwana Agarwal, Mr. Honey Khanna and Mr. Ravi Rai, Advocates. STATE ....Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with versus Ms.Priti, Advocate. Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Faraz Maqbool and Ms. Rupali Saumel, Advocates for complainant. + CRL. A. 774/2015 2. RAJESH CHAUDHARY ....Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. STATE ....Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with versus Ms.Priti, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Faraz Maqbool and Ms. Rupali Saumel, Advocates for complainant. CRL.As. 5& 7Page 1 of 46 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGEMENT2210.2018 I.S.Mehta, J.1. The Appellant Mahesh Chaudhary and Rajesh Chaudhary have preferred two separate appeal i.e. (Crl. A. 535/2015 & Crl. A. 774/2015) under Section 374 Re...
Rajesh Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. 10.2018 Date of Decision:16. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) No.3636/2016 BRAHAM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.8451/2017 SHARAVAN YADAV & ORS. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.2813/2018 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. Through Mr.A.K. Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3632/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. with Mr.Vivek Kumar Singh, Law Officer, CRPF. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) No.3635/2016 WP (C) No.3...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »