Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abb India Limited vs.the Indure Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$-5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2018 ARB.P. 583/2018 ABB INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Mohna M.Lal, Ms.Geetali Talukdar, Advs. versus THE INDURE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Vasundhra Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Letter of Award for Design & Engineering, Manufacture, Inspection, Supply, Transportation of the entire material of Electrical System for RRVUN-Suratgarh on FOR Site basis and in relation to Letter of Award for Receipt/Unloading at site, Movement within site to its location, Complete Fabrication, Erection, Testing & Commissioning including painting and Performance ARB.P.583/2018 Pag...
Avnet Technology Hong Kong Ltd. Vs.pantel Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2018 CS(COMM) 1479/2016 & IAs No.13676/2016 (u/O XIIIA CPC), 257/2018 (of defendant u/O I R-10 CPC), 258/2018 (for condonation of 79 days delay in re-filing IA No.258/2018), 3118/2018 (of Vivek Prakash u/O I R-10(2) CPC) & 14067/2018 (for modification of order dated 14th August, 2018) AVNET TECHNOLOGY HONG KONG LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Tanmay Mehta and Mr. Asit Tiwari, Advs. Versus PANTEL TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Mrinal Bharti and Mr. Manish Shekhari, Advs. Dr. Ashutosh and Mr. Bharat Beriwal, Advs. for applicant Vivek Prakash. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.2,42,64,586/- comprising of principal amount of Rs.2,20,58,715/- and pre-suit interest @ 12% per annum of Rs.22,05,871/- and for pendente lite and future interest @ 12% per annum.2. The suit was entertained. On failure of the defendant to file wri...
s.m. Tangri vs.indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d October, 2018 % + W.P.(C) 7728/2015, CM Nos. 15151/2015 & 5476/2017 S.M. TANGRI Through: Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Adv. for R1, R2 & R4 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the facts and submissions made herein above it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be graciously pleased to: (i) issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of Quo-Warranto or any other order or direction or declaration thereby holding the absorption of the respondent No.4 Shri P.N. Sharma, as Assistant Manager (HR) with respondent No.1, as null and void; and (ii) consequently, quash the appointment of respondent No.4 as Assistant Manager (HR); and W.P.(...
Pramod Kumar Goil vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1183/2018 Judgment delivered on:22.10.2018 PRAMOD KUMAR GOIL STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Gurpreet Singh with Mr. Jatin S. Sethi, Advocates with wife of the petitioner. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. Insp. Nitin Kumar, EOW. Mr. Sunil K. Mittal with Mr. Vipin K. Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates for the complainant. : JUDGMENT2210.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 1183/2018 & Crl.M.A.9818/2018 (for grant of interim regular bail) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.268/2009 under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/120B IPC, Police Station Economic Offences Wing.2. The allegations against the petitioner are the petitioner being a shareholder/Director of M/s. Shree Bihari Forgings Pvt. Ltd. has BAIL APPLN. 1183/2018 Page 1 of 5 siphoned off and misappropri...
Sunita Aggarwal & Ors. Vs.ankit Jain Alias Sonu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~OS-9 * % + CS(OS) 59/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 10.2018 SUNITA AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Pravir Jain and Mr.Shekhar Kumar, Advs. versus ANKIT JAIN ALIAS SONU & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Karan Jain, Adv. for D1 to 4 Mr.Shivam Goel, Adv. for D-5 to 8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.12425/2018 1. This application is filed under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a preliminary decree of partition in favour of the plaintiffs stating that the parties have 1/7th undivided share in the suit property bearing No.4596/1A,11, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-110002. The suit is filed by the plaintiffs for partition of the suit property. It has been pleaded in the plaint that the said property measuring 140 square yards was bought by the predecessor-in-interest of the parties, namely, Smt.Prem Lata Jain on 04.10.1974 by a registered sale deed. On 18.12.1992 Smt.Prem Lata Jain died intestate leaving behi...
Nipun Kumar Malhotra vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9643/2017, CM Nos. 39251/2017, 12571/2018, 14652/2018 & 27723/2018 Reserved on :10. h October, 2018 Pronounced on:22. d October, 2018 NIPUN MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jai Mr.Siddharth Arora, Adv. Mr. Aman Panwar & Mr. Sangam Kumar, Advs. for P-3 Dehadri, Adv. with Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC & Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. for GNCTD Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel & Mr.Sameer Vashisht, ASC with Mr.N.K. Singh & Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advs. for DTC Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for R-7 Mr. Sandeep Narain & Ms. Anjali Agarwala, Advs. for R-10 Mr. Sushil Dutt Salwan, Mr. Aditya Garg & Mr.Arjun Garg, Advs. for Antony Road Transport + W.P.(C) 5142/2018 NIPUN KUMAR MALHOTRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jai Mr.Siddharth Arora, Adv. Dehadri, Adv. with Versus W.Ps.(C)9643/2017 and 5142...
Ranjit Singh and Others vs.food Corporation of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22nd October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 336/2016 RANJIT SINGH AND OTHERS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saurabh Jain and Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocates. (M:9899030099) versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Advocate for R-1. (M:9810100237) Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocate for R-3, 4 & 5(D). (M:9891675255) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 2288/2013 (delay) 1. Learned counsel for the... Petitioners submits that there is a delay in the re-filing of section 34 petition against award dated 27th January, 2012. Objections were filed on 7th February, 2013. Learned counsel for the... Petitioners submits that the knowledge of the award having been acquired only on 15th January, 2013, when the copy of the award was received by them from the ICA, there is in fact no delay. It is the submi...
Sanjay Kumar vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~16 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d October, 2018 + MAT.APP(F.C.) 111/2018 SANJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Neeraj Sinha, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil) GNCTD with Mr. Zahid Hanief and Ms. Sana Naseem, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Laimon Rani Boro, Adv. (proxy) for Ms. Vibha Mahajan, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) MAT.APP(F.C.) 111/2018 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 15.02.2018 passed on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking maintenance for herself and her 13 years old minor daughter. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 12.12.2002. A daughter was born out of their wedlock on 16.06.2004. The Family Court has assessed the income of the respondent/wife in line with the minimum wages and fixed maintena...
Mange Ram & Anr Thr Gpa Holder vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: October 09, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 22, 2018 + LPA4422016 & CM No.28536/2016 MANGE RAM & ANR THR GPA HOLDER Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with ..... Appellant Mr. L.B. Rai, Adv. Mr. Syeed Kamran, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for ........ RESPONDENTS UOI Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mr. Govind Kumar, Advs. for L&B Department / GNCTD AND + LPA7172016 & CM Nos. 47597/2016, 47599/2016, 47839/2016 MANGE RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGAL HEIRS & ANR ..... Appellants Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.B. Rai, Adv. Mr. Syeed Kamran, Adv. Through: versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS LPA4422016 and connected matter Page 1 of 30 ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Mr. Govind Kumar, Advs. for L&B Department / GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIE...
Shri Rakesh Malhotra vs.shri Vikas Malhotra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2177/2015 SHRI RAKESH MALHOTRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Naresh Thanai, Advocate. versus SHRI VIKAS MALHOTRA & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Rahul Shukla, Advocate with Mr. Bhuvan Ravindran, Advocate. % Reserved on :04. h October, 2018 Date of Decision :22. d October, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present suit has been filed for partition by the plaintiff against the children of his deceased brother. The prayer clause in the plaint is reproduced herein below: In the facts and circumstances as stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to:-"a. partition the suit property bearing no.10, Block No.BM admeasuring 324 sq.mtrs. in Shalilmar Bagh Residential Scheme (BM-10, West Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi-110088) and share of plaintiff be separated. CS (OS) 2177/2015 Page 1 of 16 b. award cost in favour of plaintiff; and c. any other or further order which this ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »