Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
McDonalds India Pvt Ltd vs.connaught Plaza Restaurants Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~29 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:25. h October, 2018 FAO (OS) (COMM) 236/2018, CM No.43480/2018 (Stay), 43482/2018, 43483/2018 MCDONALDS INDIA PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Niti Dixit, Mr. Amit Dhingra, Mr. Rohan Jaitley, Mr. Abhishek Tewari, Ms. Raunaq Mathur, Mr. Sumit Chopra, Mr. Shivam Raheja, Ms. Zahra Aziz and Mr. Shorya Veer Berry. CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Bhargav R. Thali, Mr. Abhinandan Banerjee and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. for R-1 Ms. T. Abraham, Ms. Varuna Bhanrale and Mr. Akshay Puri, Advs. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Caveat Pet. 959/2018 Mr. Mehta has entered appearance on behalf of the caveator. The caveat petition is accordingly disposed of. FAO (OS) (COMM) 236/2018 Page 1 of 5 CM No.43481/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just...
Nikesh Kumar @ Sunny vs.state (Gnctd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23.10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1938/2018 NIKESH KUMAR @ SUNNY versus STATE (GNCTD) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Rahul Kumar, PS Special Cell CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.11/2018 under Section Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.2. Allegations in the FIR are that on 01.02.20188 secret information was received that an inter-State drug cartel was involved in smuggling and distribution of narcotic substance Ganja in Delhi and NCR.3. Acting on the secret information two persons were intercepted and apprehended opposite CNG Pump, Mohan Cooperative Estate, Industrial Area, Mathura Road, New Delhi along with one truck. The truck was BAIL APPLN. ...
Food Corporation of India, Gurdaspur (Punjab) vs.m/s Guru Nanak Mills ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d October, 2018 O.M.P. 344/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, GURDASPUR (PUNJAB) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Dewan, Advocate. versus M/S GURU NANAK MILLS & ITS PARTNERS, DHARIWAL GURDASPUR(PUNJAB) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amresh Anand, Advocate (M-9582539593). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the award dated 14th December, 2011 passed by the learned sole arbitrator under the aegis of the Indian Council of Arbitration.2. An agreement was entered into for storage and milling of paddy into rice on 15th October, 1994 between M/s. Guru Nanak Mills & Its Partners (hereinafter, millers) with the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI). Under the said agreement, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply back superfine variety rice and common variety rice to the FCI. The admitted po...
Bhushan Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:23. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 11445/2018 BHUSHAN PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sanyam Khetarpal, Adv. with Mr.Armaan Grover, Adv. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, Std. Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J.(ORAL) CM Appl.44313/2018 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11445/2018 & CM Appl.44312/2018 1. The petitioners grievance is that the documents in response to the e- tender of the Govt. of NCT of Delhi for procurement of Ayurvedic and Unani medicine could not be uploaded in the website www.govtprocurement.delhi.gov.in. In support of this contention, it has placed on record photocopies of the screenshots indicating that though repeated attempts to freeze and therefore, upload its bid were made, the website was not accepting it, and consequently, the petitioner was time...
M/S Ratna Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs.meja Urja Nigam Private ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$-33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 10.2018 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 302/2018 M/S RATNA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhay N.Das, Mr.Purvesh Buttan, Ms.Debolina Roy, Ms.Aishwarya Kumar, Advs. versus MEJA URJA NIGAM PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Aman Varma, Ms.Anshula Grover, Mr.Parth Singh Choudhari, Mr.Rahul Khanna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking extension of time for the Sole Arbitrator to make the Award in the Arbitration Case Nos.1/2013 and 1/2014 pending before him.2. The disputes between the parties have arisen out of the work of Site Leveling and Infrastructure Works Package for Meja Thermal Power Project awarded by the respondent to the petitioner vide Letter...
n.d.m.c. Vs.ravinder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % N.D.M.C. RFA No.586/2006 23rd October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel (Mob.9717466788) versus RAVINDER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 27.04.2006 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for the sum of Rs.7,98,000/-, for an amount of Rs.50,000/- with interest @ RFA No.586/2006 Page 1 of 7 12% p.a. from the date of the judgment till recovery. The claim of the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.7,98,000/- was broken up in the plaint as under:-"Compensation for rent paid for the period about six weeks @ Rs.12,054/- per month rent paid without electricity. the for the Loss ...
Sanjeev Sahdev vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~53-57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + + + + Judgment delivered on:23. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 5395/2018 & Crl.M.A.34760/2018 & 34761/2018 CRL.M.C. 5396/2018 & Crl.M.A.34762/2018 & 34763/2018 CRL.M.C. 5397/2018 & Crl.M.A.34764/2018 & 34765/2018 CRL.M.C. 5394/2018 & Crl.M.A.34758/2018 & 34759/2018 CRL.M.C. 5369/2018 & Crl.M.A.34669/2018 & 34670/2018 SANJEEV SAHDEV versus THE STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : : For the Respondent Mr.Ankit Sharma, Advocate. Mr.Izhar Ahmed, Addl. PP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns five orders all dated 10.09.2018 whereby the Appellate Court has extended time for deposit of the fine amount till 23.10.2018. In each of the five cases,... Petitioner was convicted of the 2. CRL.M.C.5395/2018, 5396/2018, 5397/2018, 5394/2018, 5369/2018 Page 1 of 3 offence under Section 138 of the ...
M/S Sigma Exports vs.state Bank of Patiala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.365/2006 + % M/S SIGMA EXPORTS23d October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Garg, Advocate (M. No.9811362403). STATE BANK OF PATIALA versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Garva Dhyani, Advocate (M. No.9910137827). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 15.02.2006 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 4,33,061/- filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondent/defendant/State Bank of Patiala. The claim of the plaintiff was that the RFA No.365/2006 Page 1 of 12 respondent/defendant-bank, after more than three and half years of giving a credit for an amount of Rs. 2,74,820/- on 27.05.1996, vide letter dated 28.08.1999, claimed that the credit advice was giv...
D R Choudhary vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"23rd October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3232/2015 D R CHOUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State Mr. Amber Mishra, Adv. for Mr. M.P. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Rajendra, Adv. for Mr. Hem Kumar, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had filed criminal complaint (CC No.472/1/2008) against the second to fourth respondents alleging offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed qua the property described as Plot No.AB-47, admeasuring 204.48 sq. yds., situated in Mianwali Nagar, New Delhi, which originally belonged to him. The prayer initially made was for the direction to the police for investigation into the case under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The said prayer was declined and the Magistr...
Ashok Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23.10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2045/2018 ASHOK KUMAR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ajay P.Tushir, Adv., Advocate. Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with SI Raghuvendra Singh, DIU/NE, Delhi. Mr.Rajat Aneja, Adv. for the complainant. HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.206/2016 under Section 420/468/471/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, P.S.Sonia Vihar.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was approached by the petitioner and another co-accused for the purposes of sale of a particular piece of land, in which the co-accused claimed to have rights based on an agreement to sell with the original owner. BAIL APPLN. 2045/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. The deal was struck for Rs. 1,...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »