Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Radhakrishna Foodland Private Limited vs.connaught Plaza Restaurants P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~27 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:25. h October, 2018 FAO (OS) (COMM) 242/2018 & CM No.44223/2018 (Stay) RADHAKRISHNA FOODLAND PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tine Abraham, Ms. Varuna Bhanrale and Mr. Akshay Puri, Advs. ..... Appellant versus CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Bhargav R. Thali, Mr. Abhinandan Banerjee and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Caveat Pet. 973/2018 1. Mr. Mehta has entered appearance on behalf of the caveator.2. The caveat petition is accordingly disposed of. CM APPL442242018 (Exemption) 3.4. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO (OS) (COMM) 242/2018 5. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 17.09.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court on an application filed by the FAO...
Vikas Bakshi President Bhrashtachar Virodhi Sangathan vs.govt. Of Nct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h October, 2018 % + W.P.(C) 9164/2017 VIKAS BAKSHI PRESIDENT BHRASHTACHAR VIRODHI SANGATHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with petitioner in person. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rizwan and Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advs. for respondent / GNCTD and SHO, C.R. Park and Kalkaji with SI Satvidner Kumar, PS-Kalkaji and SI Anil Kumar, PS-C.R. Park. Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Adv. for SDMC. Mr. Sanjay Agnihotri, Adv. respondent no.4 respondent no.4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In the aforementioned facts and grounds, it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed this Honble High Court may graciously be pleased to: that W.P.(C) No.9164/2017 Page 1 of 4 (a) allow the p...
Annabelle Analista Malibago vs.dri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~ * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. h September, 2018 Pronounced on :25. h October, 2018 CRL.A.177/2016 ANNABELLE ANALISTA MALIBAGO ....Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus ..... Respondent DRI Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The appellant Annabelle Analista Malibago assails, in this appeal, judgment dated 19th March, 2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ) convicting her of having committed the offence contemplated by Section 21(c) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act), as well as the consequential order, dated 26th March, 2014, sentencing her to rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of 1 lakh, with default simple imprisonment of one month.2. Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, appearing on behalf of the appellant, restricts her submission to one single ground, viz. tha...
Naresh Shah @ Naresh Gupta & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 5404/2018 and Crl.M.A.34806/2018 NARESH SHAH @ NARESH GUPTA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate with petitioner in person. STATE & ORS. versus Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS Vivek Vihar. R-2 & R-3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the basis of final report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.354/2016 of Police Station Vivek Vihar, the petitioners herein have been summoned by the Metropolitan Magistrate to face prosecution on the accusations for offences punishable under Sections 287/304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the case involving the death by electrocution of Manjre, son of Late Ganesh Shah. It is the case for the prosecution that the deceased while being ...
Transport Employees Welfare Asso. Vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:25. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) Nos. 23729/2005, 23730/2005, 23731/2005, 23732/2005, 23733/2005 & 23734/2005 TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSO. ........ Petitioner UOI & ORS. Through: Mr. Manoj K. Srivastava, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra ........ RESPONDENTS and Mr.Vipul Agrawal, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Zahid Hanief, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is directed against an order dated July 04, 2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) in OA No.2441/2004.... Petitioner No.1 is a society comprising, inter alia, of employees of the Enforcement Branch of the Directorate of Transport, Govt. of NCT Delhi (the Enforcement Branch). The other petitioners are individual employees of various ranks. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has rejected the petitioner...
National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Oriental Structural Enginee ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) No.443/2018 % NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA25h October, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Bishnoi, Ms. Tanvi Sapra and Mr. Sarthak Ahuja, Advocates (Mobile No.9811548007). versus M/S ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Airi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi Chandna, Ms. Bindiya Logawney and Ms. Sukanya Advocates (Mobile No.9711752002). Lal, CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.14634/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(COMM) No.443/2018 Page 1 of 10 I.A. stands disposed of. I.A. No.14635/2018 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 5 days in re-filing the petition stands condoned, subject to all just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. O.M.P. (COMM) No.443/2018 3. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration a...
Union of India (Sr. Divisional Engineer-V, Drm Office) vs.m/s Samrat C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h October, 2018 O.M.P. 669/2007 UNION OF INDIA (SR. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER-V, DRM OFFICE) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand, Proxy for Mr. S.R. Narayan, Advocate (M-9718447715). versus M/S SAMRAT CONSTRUCTION CO. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The proxy counsel for the... Petitioner seeks an adjournment. It is 1. noticed that even on the last date, none appeared for the... Petitioner and Court notice was issued. There is no reason for adjournment in the matter. None appears even for the Respondent. The brief background is that the present petition has been filed under 2. Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging the award dated 14th June, 2007. Vide the said award, the Respondent/Claimant has been awarded a sum of Rs.7,05,933/- towards the various claims made by it.3. The brief background is that the Claimant was awarded a contr...
Food Corporation of India,bhatinda vs.m/s Garg Ginning & Rice Mills an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. h October, 2018 O.M.P. 580/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA,BHATINDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate $~36 * + (M-9811537909). versus M/S GARG GINNING & RICE MILLS AND ITS PARTNERS Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent The present petition under Section 34 of Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 29th February, 2012 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and 2. M/s Garg Ginning & Rice Mills (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 17th October, 1994. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply the rice to FCI. As per the contract, FCI had supplied 42579 bags (27657.75.000 quintals) of fine variety to the miller for milling and to be delivered to FCI by 28th February, 1995. It is claimed by FCI that the ...
d.t.c. Vs.ved Prakash & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI D.T.C. Judgment Reserved on:07. 09.2018 Date of Judgment:25. 10.2018 WP (C) 7536/2002 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Manisha Tyagi, Advocate. versus VED PRAKASH & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr.Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The impugned order dated 27th March, 2002 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Tribunal) is the subject matter of challenge in this Civil Writ Petition filed by the petitioner under Articleof the Constitution of India. By the impugned order, Tribunal has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act) seeking approval of its action to remove the respondent from service. Admittedly, the respondent No.1 was appointed as an Assistant 2. Fitter with the petitioner on 7th April, 1978. He was confirmed WP (C) 7536/2002 Page 1 of 17 as Fitter on 1st ...
Smt. Swarn Kapoor & Anr vs.shri Manpreet Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
$~OS-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:25. 10.2018 CS(OS) 227/2017 SMT. SWARN KAPOOR & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Shikha Sapra, Adv. Versus SHRI MANPREET SINGH & ORS Through None ..... Defendant % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This suit is filed to declare that the plaintiff is a lawful owner in possession of the property measuring 72 sq. yards, bearing No.18/241, Malviya Nagar, New Delhi-110012 (herein referred to as the said property), for cancellation of documents mentioned in prayer (b) and (e) of the plaint as null and void executed by the plaintiff in favour of defendant Nos.1 and 2 with respect to the said property. Other consequential reliefs are also sought.2. A perusal of the plaint would show that the said property was purchased by Smt. Gian Devi (i.e. Mother of Plaintiff No.1) from Sh. Ajit Singh, vide a registered sale deed dated 08.09.1986. As per the plaint, the suit property was leased out to Sh.Sunder ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »