Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State (Nct of Delhi) vs.amit @ Mintu & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2018 CRL.REV. P. 8/2018 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner versus AMIT @ MINTU & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Manoj. Mr. Ravi Chawla, Mr. Vivek Luthra and Mr. Komal Sharma, Advs. with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The State has filed the present petition impugning order dated 03.10.2017 whereby the trial court has declined to frame a charge against the respondents Amit @ Mintu and Sandeep @ Kala in case FIR No.441/2012 under Sections 147/148/149/308/5of the IPC at Police Station Ali Pur, Delhi.2. Allegations in the FIR are that there was a quarrel between the CRL.REV.P.8/2018 Page 1 of 3 complainants brother on one side and the co-accused on the other side which led to a fight, con...
Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd vs.national Highways & Infrastructure Develeo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. 7.2018 Judgment pronounced on:26. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhay N.Das and Ms. Debolina, Advs. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Debal Banerji, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manu Beri, Adv. versus ARB.P. 278/2018 + BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD NATIONAL HIGHWAYS & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELEOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Backdrop 1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). The substantive prayer made in the petition is as under: A) This Honble Court is pleased to appoint the bitrator with reference to Clause 11(6)(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Amended), with mandate to appoint presiding arbitrator and enter into reference and proceed with adjudication; 2. The record shows that this matter came up for hearing before my predecessor on 2.5.2018 for a substantiv...
Anjana Rani vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~11 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. 4588/2015 Decided on:26. h October, 2018 ANJANA RANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Krishan Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Garima Kaushik, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the ........ RESPONDENTS State with SI Prem Raj, PS Vijay Vihar. Mr. Kishan Nautiyal, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The First Information Report (FIR) No.85/2012 was registered on 12.03.2012 by Police Station Vijay Vihar on the complaint of the petitioner, she leveling allegations against her husband, the second respondent, of he having committed certain acts of commission and omission constituting offences punishable under Sections 498- A/4on Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). On conclusion of the investigation report (charge sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was submitted on which cognizance was taken by the...
Pintu Das vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2105/2018 PINTU DAS versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Yogesh Swaroop with Mr. S.P. Bana, Advocates. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Prabhanshu, Crime Branch. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.314/2017 under Sections 381/328/4IPC, Police Station Karol Bagh (now before the Special Investigation Cell).2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant, who has a factory of making gold ornaments, left the factory in the evening. Thereafter, the co-accused is alleged to have celebrated the birthday of his son and distributed sweets among other workers, which was laced with intoxicant, after consuming which the workers became unconscious. In the morning when the com...
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs.sudhira & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~30 * % + MAC.APP. 1080/2017 & CM APPL.44656/2017 Date of Decision:26. h October, 2018 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate. versus ..... Appellant SUDHIRA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi and Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocates for R1 to R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.13,63,000/- has been awarded to the claimants/respondents No.1 to 4. The appellant seeks reduction of the award amount.2. The accident dated 04th September, 2013 resulted in the death of Rambir. The deceased was aged 50 years at the time of accident and was survived by his widow and three minor children. The deceased was working as a juice vendor.3. The Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.8,086/- per month as income of the deceased, deducted 1/4th towards his personal MAC.APP. 1080/2017 Page 1 of 5 ex...
Paridhi Aggarwal vs.ram Kumar Aggarwal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.P.A. 12/2016 & IAs No.9587/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 9588/2016 (u/O XXXIII CPC) PARIDHI AGGARWAL RAM KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS Through: Mr. Jaskaran Singh, Adv. Through: Mr. Vipul Goel, Adv. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Versus Mr. Sahil Kakkar, Adv. for R-3&4. Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv. for R-5&6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER2610.2018 Adjournment is sought on behalf of the petitioner. However, this petition to sue as an indigent person is pending for the % 1.2. last nearly three years and cannot be repeatedly adjourned for arguments. I have thus asked the counsel for the respondent No.1 and counsel for the respondents No.3&4, whether the petitioner is an indigent person.3. The counsel for the respondent No.1 has argued (i) that the petitioner is studying in Symbiosis Law School, Noida, Uttar Pradesh; (ii) that the petitioner is very affluent; (iii) that the petitioner is staying in Punjabi Bagh, New ...
Rrpr Holding Private Limited vs.securities and Exchange Board of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2018 % + W.P.(C) 9114/2018, CM Nos. 35180-35181/2018 & 44300/2018 RRPR HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with ........ Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Anuj Shah, Mr. Rishabh Sharma and Ms. Monica Benjaman, Advs. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General ........ RESPONDENTS with Ms. Sandhya Kohli, Adv. For R1 Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, Adv. For R2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.44300/2018 (for interim relief) 1. This application has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In the premises, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: (i) Direct that the proceedings relating to the Impugned SCN dated 14.03.2018 be kept in W.P.(C) No.9114/2018 Page 1 of 6 abeyance during the pendency of the pres...
Anup Deb and Anr. Vs.pratibha Deb and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:26. h October, 2018 W.P.(C) 2431/2018 ANUP DEB AND ANR. ......... Petitioners Through: Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv. versus PRATIBHA DEB AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Deepak Kr. Sharma, Mr. Ashish Sharma and Mr. G. Kaushik, Advs. for R1. Mr. R.P. Aggarwal and Mr. Sunny Verma, Advs. for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the impugned order dated 13th March, 2018 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (DRAT in short) whereby the DRAT has attached the residential house of the petitioners bearing No.A-1-1752, First Floor, Green Field, Faridabad, Haryana and various jewellery available in the shop of the petitioner no.1. W.P.(C) No.2431/2018 Page 1 of 12 2. It is the case of the petitioners that the order came to be passed when an appeal filed by the respondent no.1 namely...
Dil Bahadur vs.arya Samaj Mandir
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26. 10.2018 C.R.P. No.225/2018 DIL BAHADUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate. versus ARYA SAMAJ MANDIR Through: None.... RESPONDENTCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.42630/2018 (for delay) For the reasons explained in the application, the delay in filing the present petition is hereby condoned. The application is disposed of accordingly. C.R.P. No.225/2018 & C.M. No.42628/2018 (for stay) 1. The impugned order dated 19.04.2018 passed by the learned Civil Judge, South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Civil Suit No.51103/2016 is the subject-matter of challenge in the present Civil Revision Petition. By order dated 19.4.2018, the application of the petitioner/defendant to review the order dated 26.7.2017 under Order 39 Rule 10 CPC was dismissed. In this application, the respondent/plaintiff sought a direction to the petitioner/defendant to pay or deposit in the co...
g.p. Rural Development Youth Progress Association & Anr vs.govt. Of Nc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:25. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2680/2017 G.P. RURAL DEVELOPMENT YOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION & ANR Through: None. ........ Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. There is no appearance for the petitioners even on the second call.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: It is therefore most respectfully prayed that in the interest of general welfare of the citizens, this Honble Court may pass: the a) an order directing Community Centre facility restored to the Residents and got the land belonging to the Pond vacated, restored and developed. the Respondent to get W.P.(C) No.2680/2017 Page 1 of 4 b) an order to direct the respondent to construct and restore facility of a Multipurpose Community Centre at the Villag...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »