Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
n.d Sharma vs.central Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~107 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :26. 10.2018 CM(M) 647/2018 & CM No.44811/2018 N.D SHARMA Through: versus... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Through: Mr. R.S. Mathur, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2610.2018 VINOD GOEL, J.1. The petitioner sent a complaint dated 26.10.2017 against Sh. Mukesh Kumar, learned Additional District Judge, Patiala House Court, New Delhi (ADJ) to the Honble the Acting Chief Justice for not disposing of his Civil Suit No.369/2016 (old No.CS (OS) 58535/2016) (old No.CS (OS) 2464/2011). It was noticed on the administrative side that even after transfer of his case to the new incumbent, the matter has been adjourned twice for final arguments. On the orders of Honble the Acting Chief Justice, the matter is being taken up suo moto under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing time bound directions to the concerned Court to dispose of the matter expe...
Dharam Singh Rana vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 267/2002 DHARAM SINGH RANA Decided on:26. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Zahid, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) 1. This Writ Petition is directed against an order dated 30.07.2001 by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal]. in the petitioners application against a disciplinary order of the respondents inflicting the punishment of removal from service upon him.2. The petitioner joined the service of the respondents as a Lower Division Clerk in 1976, and was promoted as an Upper Division Clerk in 1998. By a memo dated 27.07.1990 under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules 1965, which was served upon him on 03.09.1990, two charges wer...
Anand Mohan Saran vs.cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. September, 2018 Date of Decision:26 October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 1178/2015 and CRL.M.A. 4318/2015 ANAND MOHAN SARAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Khaitan, Mr.H.K.Sharma and Ms.Vaibhavi Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gaur, Mr. Pulkit Jain, Mr. Vivek Punia Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP for CBI, with Mr.Prateek Kumar, Adv. CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT2610.2018 I. S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant is a petition invoking Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of entire proceeding pending in case FIR/RC No.RC.AC32003/A/0002/CBI/ACU-III/New Delhi under Sections 7, 8, and Section 13(1)(d) Read With Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code on the ground of lack of evidence. CRL.M.C. 1178/2015 and CRL.M.A. 4318/2015 Page 1 of 15 2. Brief facts stated are that on the basis of source information ...
Krishan Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2018 CRL.REV. P. 311/2017 KRISHAN KUMAR STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. A.U. Khan, Mr. Jeewan Chandra and Mr. S. Firoz, Advs. . For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ravinder Kumar Mr. Aakanksha Bansal, Adv. for R-2 . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 14.09.2016 whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning order dated 20.02.2016 and 26.03.2016 of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) declaring respondent No.2 to be a juvenile has been dismissed.2. The appellate Court found that the JJB had determined the age CRL.REV.P.311/2017 Page 1 of 9 of respondent No.2 on the basis of the matriculation certificate. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Supreme Court in Prag Bhati Vs. State of UP & Or...
Versatile Commotrade Pvt Ltd. Vs.adharshila Country Homes Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :1. t October, 2018 Date of decision :26th October, 2018 CS (OS) 381/2014, I.As. 7320/2015 & 13279/2018 CS (OS) 402/2014, I.As. 7318/2015 & 13278/2018 VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PVT LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Nikhlesh Krishnan & Mr. Aman (M:9810683803 Prasad, Advocates. & 9718684930) versus ADHARSHILA COUNTRY HOMES PVT LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jagdeep Dharma, Mr. Gyanendra Kumar and Mr. Sharaf Habibullah, Advs. (M:88000099887) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT The present judgment disposes of two suits for recovery filed by the Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. Plaintiff. Suit no.1 - CS (OS) 402/2014 2. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.1,50,00,000/- along with interest @ 16.25%. The brief facts are that the Plaintiff entered into an agreement to sell dated 7th April, 2013 (ATS-1) with the Defendant, for the sale of 9...
National Technical Research Organization (Ntro) vs.telecommunications ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 191/2016 NATIONAL TECHNICAL RESEARCH ORGANIZATION (NTRO) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ruchir Mishra & Mr.Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advs. versus TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTES INDIA LIMITED (TCIL) Through: Mr.P.K. Bansal & Ms.Anjali Bablani, ..... Respondent Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 06.03.2014 and the order dated 22.01.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. The learned counsel for the respondent has raised a primary objection on the maintainability of the present petition on the ground of it being barred by Law of Limitation as provided in Section 34(3) of the Ac...
Icici Bank Ltd vs.manjeet Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:26. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11477/2018 ICICI BANK LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla, Adv. versus MANJEET KUMAR SINGH Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.44422/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 11477/2018 1 . This petition has been filed by the petitioner ICICI Bank Ltd. Challenging the order dated 4th October, 2018 passed by Debt Recovery Tribunal-III (DRT-III in short) in Original Application No.469/2017 whereby DRT-III has refused to entertain the OA and directed the Registrar of the Tribunal to place the case file before the concerned DRT as per the notification dated 11th May, 2015 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India. W.P.(C) No.11477/2018 Page 1 of 14 2. It is the submission of Mr. Puneet K. Bhalla, learned counsel for t...
Rama Rani vs.state & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 74/2015 RAMA RANI Through: Mr. Zorawar Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE & OTHERS Through: ..... Respondent Date of Decision:26. h October, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed for grant of Letters of Administration of Will dated 13th November, 2007 under Section 278 read with Section 300 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 with respect to the estate of deceased Sh. Harish Chander, son of Late Sh. Sat Bhushan.2. It is stated in the petition that the petitioner is the wife of the testator Late Sh. Harish Chander who expired on 19th August, 2013, in New Delhi. The deceased is stated to have executed a registered Will dated 13th November, 2007, which was duly attested by Mr. Arun K. Jindal and Mr. Mohit Verma. The Will dated 13th November, 2007 executed by the deceased is reproduced hereinbelow:-"TEST.CAS.74/2015 Page 1 of 6 3. WILL I, Harish Chander...
Tripat Chaudhary vs.arundhati Sapru Mehra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~4 & 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h October, 2018 Decided on :26. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1223/2015 and Crl. M.A. 4484/2015 TRIPAT CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shri Singh & Ms. Schuchi Dwivedi, Advs. versus ARUNDHATI SAPRU MEHRA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Respondent in person Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State + CRL.M.C. 947/2016 and Crl. M.A. 4009/2016 and 4529/2018 YASH MEHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. 1223/2015 and 947/2016 Page 1 of 17 ORDER (ORAL) 1. Arundhati Sapru Mehra, first respondent in Crl. M.C12232015 and the second respondent in Crl. M.C. 947/2016 was married to Yash Mehra (petitioner in Crl. M.C. 947/2016) on 12.07.2001. She (hereinafter, referred to as the complainant) had lodge...
M/S Kannu Aditya India Ltd. Vs.state Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11540/2018 and CM Nos. 44668/2018 & 44669/2018 M/S KANNU ADITYA INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mrs Anjali J.Manish and Ms Nidhi Saini, Advocates. versus STATE BANK OF INDIA Through: Counsel for ..... Respondent the respondent (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2610.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:-"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the reply dated 14.10.2018 under Section 13(3A) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 representation dated 27.09.2018. to (b) Grant the cost of the petition. 2. In substance, the petitioner seeks to challenge the proceedings instituted by the respondent bank ( State Bank of India hereafter the SBI) for enforcement of security interest under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of S...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »