Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.dalel Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2018 LPA6052018, CM Nos. 44443-44445/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. versus DALEL SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for respondent / DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.44445/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM. No.44443/2018 (for delay) This is an application filed by the applicant / appellant seeking condonation of 337 days delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 337 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. LPA No.605/2018 Page 1 of 3 LPA. No.605/2018 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 23rd October, 2017 passed by the learned Singl...
Heena vs.state Govt. Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2018 CRL.REV.P. 360/2017 & Crl. M.A. 8084/2017 HEENA versus STATE GOVT. NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.REV.P. 555/2017 & Crl. M.A. 12186/2017 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ROHIT KUMAR TOMAR & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Sandeep Das with Ms. Mehak Khurana, Advs. (Crl. Rev. P. 360/2017) Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr Sushila (Crl. Rev. P. 555/2017) For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Sushila (Crl. Rev. P. 360/2017) Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav Mehdiratta, Advs. for R-2 (Crl. Rev. P. 360/2017) Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav Mehdiratta, Advs. for R-1 (Crl. Rev. P. 555/2017) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2610.2018 CRL.REV.P. 360/2017 & 555/2017 Page 1 of 14 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitio...
Versatile Commotrade Pvt Ltd vs.adharshila Country Homes Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :1. t October, 2018 Date of decision :26th October, 2018 CS (OS) 381/2014, I.As. 7320/2015 & 13279/2018 CS (OS) 402/2014, I.As. 7318/2015 & 13278/2018 VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PVT LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Nikhlesh Krishnan & Mr. Aman (M:9810683803 Prasad, Advocates. & 9718684930) versus ADHARSHILA COUNTRY HOMES PVT LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jagdeep Dharma, Mr. Gyanendra Kumar and Mr. Sharaf Habibullah, Advs. (M:88000099887) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT The present judgment disposes of two suits for recovery filed by the Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. Plaintiff. Suit no.1 - CS (OS) 402/2014 2. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.1,50,00,000/- along with interest @ 16.25%. The brief facts are that the Plaintiff entered into an agreement to sell dated 7th April, 2013 (ATS-1) with the Defendant, for the sale of 9...
National Hawkers Federation ( Akshardham) vs.commissioner of Police an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:26. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 3591/2017 NATIONAL HAWKERS FEDERATION ( AKSHARDHAM) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr.Rahul Kalra, and Mr.Rohit Kumar Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms.Urvashi Tripathi and Ms.Sukriti Ghai, Advocates for R- 1 to 4 & R-6. Mr.Jagdish Sagar, Advocate for R-5. Mr.R.V.Sinha, Mr.A.S.Singh Mr.Amit Sinha, Advocates for R-7. and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Fifty members of the petitioners association who claim to be vending near Akshardham Metro Station having been removed by the SHO of the area, has led to the filing of the present petition. W.P. (C) No.3591/2017 Page 1 of 8 2. Mr.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that members of the petitioners association have been singled out by the SHO who has no jurisdicti...
Yash Mehra vs.the State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~4 & 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. h October, 2018 Decided on :26. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1223/2015 and Crl. M.A. 4484/2015 TRIPAT CHAUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shri Singh & Ms. Schuchi Dwivedi, Advs. versus ARUNDHATI SAPRU MEHRA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Respondent in person Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State + CRL.M.C. 947/2016 and Crl. M.A. 4009/2016 and 4529/2018 YASH MEHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. 1223/2015 and 947/2016 Page 1 of 17 ORDER (ORAL) 1. Arundhati Sapru Mehra, first respondent in Crl. M.C12232015 and the second respondent in Crl. M.C. 947/2016 was married to Yash Mehra (petitioner in Crl. M.C. 947/2016) on 12.07.2001. She (hereinafter, referred to as the complainant) had lodge...
Ms. X (Through Her Mother Vijendera) vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2018 CRL.REV. P. 59/2017 MS. X (THROUGH HER MOTHER VIJENDERA) ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: : For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Prashant Manchanda and Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advs. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Addl. PP for the State with SI Uday Singh. Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Adv. for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2610.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 08.12.2016 whereby the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) has determined the age of respondent No.2 to be below 18 years on the date of commission of the offence and he was declared a juvenile for the purposes of inquiry under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. CRL.REV.P.59/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no inquiry was conducted by the JJB while returning the ...
M/S V2 Retail Ltd vs.m/s s.s Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on :5. h October, 2018 Date of decision :26th October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 64/2017 M/S V2 RETAIL LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma & Mr. Pranav Verma (M-91871704611). versus M/S S.S ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar & Mr. Bhanu (M- Advocates Sanoriay, 9953227984). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioner, who was the Respondent in the arbitral proceedings (referred to as Respondent for the sake of consistency) has preferred the present petition challenging the award dated 27th December, 2012 passed by Justice J.P. Singh (Retired) Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The Respondent had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter MOU) dated 25th December, 2007 with M/s. S.S.Enterprises- Claimant in the arbitral proceedings (referred to as `Claimant for the sake of consistency), by which the Respondent took on lease suit property i.e. part of 3/1/22,...
sh.rameshwar Dass & Anr. Vs.sh. Bhawan Singh & Ors. (Iffco Tokio Gener ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~33 * % 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAC.APP. 385/2018 Date of Decision:26. h October, 2018 SH.RAMESHWAR DASS & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Ms.Pankaj Kumari, Advocates versus SH. BHAWAN SINGH & ORS. (IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.A.K. Soni, Mr.Pavan Kumar, for Mr.Rajiv Bajaj, Advocates respondent No.3. JUDGEMENT (ORAL) The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.7,92,000/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. The accident dated 24th December, 2010 resulted in the death of Neeraj Sindhu. The deceased was aged 23 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his parents who claimed compensation. The deceased was a student who was giving tuitions and earning Rs.10,000/- per month.3. The Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs.6,448/- per month as income of the deceased, deducted 50% towards his perso...
Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.sh. Bhim Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h October, 2018 LPA6062018, CM Nos. 44495-44497/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. versus SH. BHIM SINGH AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs. for respondent / DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.44497/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM. No.44495/2018 (for delay) This is an application filed by the applicant / appellant seeking condonation of 337 days delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 337 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. LPA No.606/2018 Page 1 of 3 LPA. No.606/2018 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 23rd October, 2017 passed by the learned...
The State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi vs.rohit Kumar Tomar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-2018
$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 10.2018 CRL.REV.P. 360/2017 & Crl. M.A. 8084/2017 HEENA versus STATE GOVT. NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.REV.P. 555/2017 & Crl. M.A. 12186/2017 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ROHIT KUMAR TOMAR & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Sandeep Das with Ms. Mehak Khurana, Advs. (Crl. Rev. P. 360/2017) Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr Sushila (Crl. Rev. P. 555/2017) For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with Inspr. Sushila (Crl. Rev. P. 360/2017) Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav Mehdiratta, Advs. for R-2 (Crl. Rev. P. 360/2017) Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav Mehdiratta, Advs. for R-1 (Crl. Rev. P. 555/2017) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2610.2018 CRL.REV.P. 360/2017 & 555/2017 Page 1 of 14 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »