Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Umesh Verma & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4203/2015 and Crl.M.A.15012/2015 UMESH VERMA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Anurag Sahay, Mr. Roopesh Singh, & Mr. Ruchir Batra, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Sachin, PS Subhash Place. Mr. Nitin Ahlawat, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the complaint (CC No.197/01/14) of the third respondent under directions of the Metropolitan Magistrate, by order dated 07.09.2015, the Station House Officer of Police Station Subhash Place registered first information report (FIR) No.944/2015 on 16.10.2015 for investigation into offences allegedly committed, inter alia, by the petitioner, they statedly being punishable under Sections 420/407/416/467/468/380/506/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Crl. M.C. No.4203/2015 Page 1 of 4 2. ...
M/S Srs Construction & Earth Movers vs.senbo Engineering Ltd. & Anothe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.836/2016 + % M/S SRS CONSTRUCTION & EARTH MOVERS29h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Trakru, Advocate. versus SENBO ENGINEERING LTD. & ANOTHER Through: Mr. Ashok Anand, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS with Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate (M. No.9810580541). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 31.03.2016 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 5,91,616/- filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondent/defendant. The amount prayed in the suit was the claim for the balance due for the work done RFA No.836/2016 Page 1 of 7 by the appellant/plaintiff for the respondent no.1/defendant no.1 for the Delhi Metro Rail Project at Delhi.2. The facts of the case are t...
Nitin Chawla vs.state ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29.10.2018 % + BAIL APPLN. 2491/2018 NITIN CHAWLA versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Ms. Usha Pandey, Advocate. Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Sushil Sanwaria, PS Defence Colony. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2910.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of four weeks in FIR No.115/2016 under Sections 498A/304B/3IPC, Police Station Defence Colony. The petitioner has been in custody since 26.03.2016.2. Interim bail is sought on the ground that the three family members of the petitioner, i.e., his father, mother and brother are ailing. It is contended that the mother of the petitioner is suffering from chronic kidney disease, anaemia and hypertension. Mother has been advised preparation for dialysis. Father is aged 78 years and is also suffe...
Ashok Kumar vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4200/1997 ASHOK KUMAR Date of Judgment:29. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate UOI & ORS. versus Through: Ms.Rashmi Malhotra, Mr.Shalinder ..... Respondent Saini & Mr.Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) ORDER2910.2018 The petitioners grievance is that the Tribunal even while returning % 1. its finding that the law was not complied with inasmuch as the copy of the Inquiry Report was not furnished to the petitioner [by virtue of the decision in Managing Director ECIL vs. B. Karunakar (1993) 4 SCC727, directed his reinstatement but without any benefit of past service. The operative order of the Tribunal is as follows: 4. Ordinarily, in the circumstances aforesaid, we would have set aside the impugned order and sent back the case to the disciplinary authority to start afresh with the disciplinary W.P.(C) 4200/1997 ...
Krr Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 87/2018 KRR INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Amit George, Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Ms.Alka Srivastava, Ms.Prachee Satija and Mr.Rishabh Dheer, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Mukesh Kr.Tiwari, Mr.Ramneek Mishra and Mr.Abhishek Rana, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) Rev. Pet. 267/2018 1. This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking review of the order dated 12.03.2018 passed by this Court partially allowing the challenge of the petitioner to the Arbitral Award dated 05.07.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract Agreement No.DGMAP/PHASE-II/PKG-19/1(B)/19 of 2010-11: Construction of dwelling units including allied services for ORs at Hasting Road, Dakshineshwar RRC (Fort William), OD Line & Rasponja, ...
M/S Inter Ikea Systems B v vs.quess Corp Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 10.2018 FAO1572016 & C.M. Nos.6654/2017, 37601-02/2018 M/S INTER IKEA SYSTEMS B V ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sai Krishna, Ms. Tanya Varma Ganguly, Paulami and Ms. Advocates. Versus QUESS CORP LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manu Seshadri, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant has impugned an order dated 06.01.2016 which declined interim protection under section 29 (9) and section 29 (4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 against infringement of its trademark registered in India. It claims ownership of the trademark IKEA and had sought injunction against infringement of the same by the respondent, who was using the word trademark IKYA along with a logo, for carrying on its business. The impugned order holds that the trademark used by the respondent, being registered enjoyed full statutory protection to be used FAO1572016 ...
Ankit Sharma vs.shilpi Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ANKIT SHARMA SHILPI ARORA RFA No.887/2018 29th October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Parul Verma, Advocate versus (M. No.9711771157). Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.45104/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Nos.45103/2018 (for condonation of delay in filing) & 45105/2018(for condonation of delay in re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 98 days in filing and 37 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. RFA No.887/2018 Page 1 of 6 RFA No.887/2018 and C.M. No.45102/2018(stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 02.01.2018 by which the trial court has dismis...
Ashok Kriplani vs.asstt Director B K Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:29th October, 2018 + LPA6822017 ASHOK KRIPLANI Through: In person. versus ASSTT DIRECTOR B K SINGH ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.35527/2018 1. Respondent is served and is represented by Mr. Amit Mahajan, learned CGSC.2. In the application, the appellant has prayed for the following relief: In view of abovesaid facts and circumstances, it is prayed most respectfully to this Honble Court to modify the judgment and order dated 08/8/2018 in terms of as follows:1. Direct the respondent to allow the appellant to inspect file of his complaint filed before the LPA6822017 Page 1 of 3 respondent with a liberty to take copies of the documents and orders therein, 2. Direct the appellant authority of the Enforcement Directorate to decide the appeal of the appellant within six months of time when t...
Neena Narang vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
$~38 & 40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5023/2015 & CM APPL.2148/2018, 2149/2018 PAARDARSHITA PUBLIC WELFARE FOUNDATION (NGO) ........ Petitioner Das Through: Mr.Harkrishan Nijhawan, General Secretary of the petitioner in person. versus COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC for for for GNCTD with Ms.Shivani Vij, Mr.Mahamaya Chatterjee, Mr.Nitish Kumar and Mr.Manish Dua, Advocates for respondent. Mr.Jagdish Sagar, Advocate for R-3. Mr.B.S.Dhir and Ms.Yashika Vij, Advocates for respondent/DDA. Ms.Eshita Baruah, Adv. Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate respondent/SDMC. Mr.Rajneesh Vats, SC and Mr.Tushar Sannu, Adv. for respondent/NDMC. SI Vinod Dabas from Transport Department. SI Jagmeshwar Dayal, Parvi Officer (Traffic) and (Traffic) Rajender Kumar, TI, R.K.Puram. Mr.Ajay Arora and Mr.Kapil Dutta, Advocates respondent/North DMC. Mr.Satish Dahiya, ACP, Ved Prakash Jha, T.I., Karol Bagh Circle, Kaushal Pandey,...
Dr. Sunil Puri vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:19. 07.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:29. 10.2018 % + W.P.(C) 8975/2017, CM APPL. 36733/2017, CM APPL. 44323/2017 DR. SUNIL PURI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Yadav, Ms. Jhanvi Subey, Mr. Faraz Mazbool, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P. Swarna with Mr. Narula, Adv. for UOI. Mr. M. Mishra, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Relevant Facts 1. The petitioner, in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeks a direction for quashing the impugned notification bearing No.GSR60(E) dated 28.01.2015 issued by Union of India, through the secretary, ministry of Health & Family welfare (hereafter referred to as the UOI). A further direction to the Government of NCT of Delhi (hereafter NCT) to grant the registration/ renewal of registration of the petitioner or ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »