Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijender Singh vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 568/2003 Reserved on:5. h October, 2018 Decided on:30. h October, 2018 PREM PAL .....Appellant Through: Mr.B.Badrinath,Advocate (DHCLSC). versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + Through: Mr.K.S.Ahuja, APP for State. CRL.A. 358/2003 VIJENDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Sharma, Mr.Rahul Sharma versus and Mr.Prayas Aneja, Advocates. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.K.S.Ahuja, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 20th March 2003 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.183 of 1999 arising out of FIR No.364 of 1998 registered at Police Station (PS) Okhla Industrial Area, convicting the Appellants for the Crl. A. Nos. 568 & 358 of 2003 Page 1 of 29 offences under Sections 120B, 364, 302 and 201 IPC read with Section 392 IPC.2. These appeals are also ...
M/S Laxmi Narayan Builders & Suppliers vs.m/s Ganpati Buildtech Pvt. L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.892/2018 + % M/S LAXMI NARAYAN BUILDERS & SUPPLIERS30h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Vijay Waghey, Mr. Advocate (9810244197) Through: versus ..... Respondent M/S GANPATI BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.45382/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.45383/2018 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned. RFA No.892/2018 Page 1 of 12 CM stands disposed of. RFA No.892/2018 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 03.05.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 25,42,823/- filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondent/defendant. The said suit amount was claimed...
Anita & Ors. Vs.the (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~55 & 57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (CRL.) 1686/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 10.2018 ANITA & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus THE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR + W.P. (CRL.) 1742/2018 ........ RESPONDENTS KULDEEP DABAS & ORS. STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. K. Pandey and Mr. Narender Singh, Advs. in W.P. (Crl.) 1686/2018 Mr. Kuldeep Dabas and Ms. Rakhee Gupta, Advs. in W.P. (Crl.) 1742/2018 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Addl. PP for the State with SI ASI Gordhan Singh in W.P. (Crl.) 1686/2018 Ms. Iti Pandey, Addl. PP for the State with SI ASI Gordhan Singh in W.P. (Crl.) 1742/2018 Mr. K. Pandey and Mr. Narender Singh, Advs. for R-2 in W.P. (Crl.) 1686/2018 Ms. Rakhee Gupta, Adv. for R-2 in W.P. (Crl.) 1742/2018 W.P. (CRL) 1686/2018 & 1742/2018 Page 1 of 4 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petiti...
Kamla vs.charan Singh Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. 10.2018 CM (M) No.1325/2018 KAMLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan & Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocates. versus ...Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for CHARAN SINGH SHARMA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL North MCD/R-9. VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.45492/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM (M) No.1325/2018 & C.M. No.45491/2018 (for stay) 1. In this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 16.7.2018 by which the court of learned Additional District Judge-03, North District, Rohini dismissed the application of the petitioner to treat issue Nos.3, 4, 5 and 7 as preliminary issues. Learned ADJ has observed that these issues are mixed question of facts and law and cannot be treated as preliminary issues. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at least issue No...
Debabrata Mishra vs.girdhari Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:9. h October, 2018 Judgment delivered on:30. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2306/2013 SAKET SINGH & ORS GIRDHARI LAL + CRL.M.C. 2307/2013 RAHUL GUPTA GIRDHARI LAL + CRL.M.C. 241/2014 DEBABRATA MISHRA versus versus versus GIRDHARI LAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ankur Aggarwal and Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advs in Crl.M.C.2306/2013 Mr. Omung Gupta and Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advs. in Crl.M.C.2307/2013 Mr. J.P. Mishra, Adv. in Crl.M.C.241/2014 For the Respondent: Mr. Vijay Kr. Singh, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Crl M.C23062013, Crl.M.C.2307/2013 & Crl.M.C.241/2014 Page 1 of 10 JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.CRL.M.C. 2306/2013 & Crl. M.A. 8876/2013 (stay), 4574/2014 (for bringing on record additional facts); CRL.M.C. 2307/2013 & Crl. M.A. 8879/2013 (stay) & CRL.M.C. 241/2014 & ...
Harender Singh vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 2228/2015 HARENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuldeep Rana, Adv. versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Kumar, PS Madhu Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the petitioner as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 30.11.2008. On 09.08.2010, she lodged first information report (FIR) No.267/2010 with police station Madhu Vihar alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A, 406, 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (the petitioner) and two of his relatives namely Om Biri and Rajpal Singh. On conclusion of investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on which cognizance was taken and process issued against the petitioner, the said mater being pending on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate. It...
Super Cassettes Industries Pvt Ltd vs.star Broadband Services India Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~OS-1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 10.2018 CS(COMM) 30/2017 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PVT LTD STAR BROADBAND SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD..... Defendant Through Mr. K.K.Khetan, Adv Through Mr. Uttam Datt, Adv ..... Plaintiff versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. Present suit is filed seeking an order of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants etc. from engaging in themselves or from authorising the recording distributing, broadcasting, public performance/ communication to the public or in any other way exploiting the cinematography films, sound recordings, literary works and musical works or any other part thereof throughout India that is owned by the plaintiff including all works whereupon the plaintiff has shown its copyright under section 52A of the Copyright Act. An order for rendition of accounts is also sought. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. The case of the plaintiff is that plaintiff is the ow...
Vinod Chopra vs.vasudev Chopra & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~21 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h October, 2018 + RFA(OS) 2/2018 VINOD CHOPRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manu Shanker Mishra, Mr.Balwant Singh Billowria and Mr.Parveen Kumar, Advocates with appellant in person. versus VASUDEV CHOPRA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Alok Kumar, Mr.Amit Kumar Singh and Mr.Abhishek Paruthi, Advocates for R-1 and R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.44371/2018 (delay in filing rejoinder) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellant under Section 151 CPC seeking condonation of delay in filing rejoinder to the reply filed in C.M.1119/2018.2. There is no opposition to the prayer made in the application. Accordingly, the delay of 40 days in filing the rejoinder is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. C.M.1119/2018 (delay of 585 days in filing the appeal) 4. The present application has been filed by the appellant under Sectio...
Mrs. Shalini Sardana vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Dlehi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 456/2018 & Crl.M.A. 8141/2018 MRS. SHALINI SARDANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Chhabra & Mr. Satender Singh, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DLEHI) & ORS......... RESPONDENTS + Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Aman Kumar, PS CWC, Nanak Pura. Mr. Anshuj Dhingra, Adv. for R-2 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had lodged first information report (FIR) No.38/2009 with police station Crime against Women Cell (CWC), Nanak Pura on 07.03.2009 alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A/4of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed qua her by the second to fifth respondents. It may be mentioned here itself that she (the complainant) was married to Somesh Sardana on 22.01.1999. During the period of her cohabitation, two children had taken birth, the first in July 2001 and the second in July, 2008. Her husband (Somesh Sarda...
Prem Pal vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 568/2003 Reserved on:5. h October, 2018 Decided on:30. h October, 2018 PREM PAL .....Appellant Through: Mr.B.Badrinath,Advocate (DHCLSC). versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent + Through: Mr.K.S.Ahuja, APP for State. CRL.A. 358/2003 VIJENDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Sharma, Mr.Rahul Sharma versus and Mr.Prayas Aneja, Advocates. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr.K.S.Ahuja, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 20th March 2003 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.183 of 1999 arising out of FIR No.364 of 1998 registered at Police Station (PS) Okhla Industrial Area, convicting the Appellants for the Crl. A. Nos. 568 & 358 of 2003 Page 1 of 29 offences under Sections 120B, 364, 302 and 201 IPC read with Section 392 IPC.2. These appeals are also ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »