Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar vs.state and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Advocates who appeared in this case: CRL.M.C. 320/2018 RAJ KUMAR versus STATE AND OTHERS Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. T.R. Sharma, Adv. : For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Anita Abraham, Addl. PP for the State with SI Shekhar JUDGMENT3001.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 28.04.2016 passed by the trial court discharging the respondents of the alleged offences under Section 415 and 465 of the IPC. The petitioner further impugns the order of the Revisional Court dated 26.07.2016 dismissing the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 28.04.2016 of the trial court.2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that one Sh. Puran Chand was the owner of property bearing No.M-357, Chander Shekhar Azad Colony, Kishan Ganj, Delhi. CRL.M.C. 320/2018 Page 1 of 4 3. It ...
Arun Dayal vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7405/2016 ARUN DAYAL Through: Mr.S.K.Rout, Mr.Pawan Kumar and ........ Petitioner Mr.Aman Mehrothra, Advts. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akhil Mittal, Adv. for respondents no.1 and 2. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, standing counsel for DDA with Ms.Kajri Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of the petitioner measuring 1 bigha comprised in Khasra no.417/2/1, Village Chandrawali @ Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter r...
Charan Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~46 to 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS KAMLESH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS JITENDER GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS + W.P.(C) 1371/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1390/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1391/2017 CHAMAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1448/2017 CHARAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1457/2017 versus Present: Mr.Sunil K.Goel and Mr.Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate for the SATBIR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner petitioners in all the matters. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for the LAC/L&B deptt. in all the matters. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for the DDA in W.P.(C) 1371/2017 & W.P.(C) 1448/2017. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, standing counsel with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms.Simmee Kumari, Advts. ...
M/S Shiv Charan Das & Sons & Ors vs.dharminder Kumar Decd. thr.lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2018 CM(M) 2736-2739/2005 M/S SHIV CHARAN DAS & SONS & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate versus DHARMINDER KUMAR DECD. THR.LRs ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Malik, Mr. Angad Mehta and Mr. Dhawal Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have instituted the eviction case (E-16/1992) against the respondents in respect of the premises described as bearing no.36, Katra Bariyan near Farash Khana, Lal Kuan, Delhi, the tenancy having been created concededly in 1960s at a rental which would render it a protected tenancy governed by the provisions of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, the prayer for eviction pressed being on the grounds of sub-letting; misuse for non-residential purposes; it not having been used for purposes of residence for which it had statedly been let out; it having been rendered unsafe and unfit for human habitation and ...
Lalit Suri vs.commissioner of Wealth Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 01.2018 + WTA52008 LALIT SURI THR. LRS JYOTSNA SURI COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI Versus + WTA62008 JYOTSNA SURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI I + WTA72008 JYOTSNA SURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI I + WTA82008 LALIT SURI THR. LRS JYOTSNA SURI COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus . Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS . Appellant .... Respondent . Appellant .... Respondent . Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Advocate, for appellants. Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The questions of law framed in these four appeals are as follows: IN WTA52008 (1) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) erred in giving a finding that these assets were not inclu...
Md Jamilur Rahman vs.jamia Millia Islamia University and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2018 (10) + W.P.(C) 11975/2015 & CM318142015 (11) + W.P.(C) 11976/2015 & CM318152015 (12) + W.P.(C) 11977/2015 & CM318162015 (13) + W.P.(C) 11978/2015 & CM318172015 (14) + W.P.(C) 11980/2015 & CM318182015 (15) + W.P.(C) 11981/2015 & CM318192015 (16) + W.P.(C) 11985/2015 & CM318242015 (17) + W.P.(C) 11986/2015 & CM318252015 (18) + W.P.(C) 11987/2015 & CM318262015 (19) + W.P.(C) 11990/2015 & CM318292015 (20) + W.P.(C) 11991/2015 & CM318302015 (21) + W.P.(C) 11993/2015 & CM318312015 (22) + W.P.(C) 11994/2015 & CMs 31832/2015 & 60(23) + W.P.(C) 11998/2015 & CM318402015 (24) + W.P.(C) 12000/2015 & CM318432015 (25) + W.P.(C) 12001/2015 & CM318442015 (26) + W.P.(C) 12003/2015 & CM318462015 (27) + W.P.(C) 12010/2015 & CM318532015 (28) + W.P.(C) 12011/2015 & CM318542015 (29) + W.P.(C) 12018/2015 & CM318812015 (30) + W.P.(C) 12019/2015 & CM318822015 (31) + W.P.(C) 12020/2015 & CM318832015 (32) + W.P.(C) 12021/2015 & CM318842015...
Lalit Suri thr.lr Jyotsna Suri vs.commissioner of Wealth Tax Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 01.2018 + WTA52008 LALIT SURI THR. LRS JYOTSNA SURI COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI Versus + WTA62008 JYOTSNA SURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI I + WTA72008 JYOTSNA SURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI I + WTA82008 LALIT SURI THR. LRS JYOTSNA SURI COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus . Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS . Appellant .... Respondent . Appellant .... Respondent . Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Advocate, for appellants. Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The questions of law framed in these four appeals are as follows: IN WTA52008 (1) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) erred in giving a finding that these assets were not inclu...
Raheja Developers Limited vs.proto Developers and Technologies Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h January, 2018 + O.M.P. (MISC.) 8/2017 RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shalabh Singhal, Mr.Abinash Agarwal, Advs. versus PROTO DEVELOPERS AND TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED & ORS. Through: Ch.Ranjit Singh, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 29-A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking extension of time for making of the arbitral award by the Arbitral Tribunal.2. Counsel for the respondents submits that as the Arbitral Tribunal was constituted on an application filed under Section 11 of the Act before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, the present petition would not be maintainable before this Court in view of Section 42 of the Act.3. Section 42 of the Act is reproduced hereinbelow:-"42. Jurisdiction. Notwithstanding anything OMP (M...
Santesh Kumar Ray vs.govt of N C T Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2018 W.P.(C) 767/2018 & CMs 3214-16/2018 SANTESH KUMAR RAY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Singh, Advocate versus GOVT OF N C T DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat and Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocates for respondent-GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) There is an office objection regarding maintainability of this writ petition. An application has been filed by petitioner stating that in view of the urgent relief required, this petition be entertained.2. In this petition, mandamus is sought to respondents-Directorate of Education and Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board to entertain petitioners online application for the Post Code 114/2017 in relation to Advertisement No.4/2017 of 20th December, 2017.3. It is pointed out by learned counsel for respondent-GNCTD that matters relating to recruitment by the Schools falling under the jurisdiction of Directorate of Educat...
Chaman Singh vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~46 to 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS KAMLESH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS JITENDER GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS + W.P.(C) 1371/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1390/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1391/2017 CHAMAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1448/2017 CHARAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1457/2017 versus Present: Mr.Sunil K.Goel and Mr.Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate for the SATBIR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner petitioners in all the matters. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for the LAC/L&B deptt. in all the matters. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for the DDA in W.P.(C) 1371/2017 & W.P.(C) 1448/2017. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, standing counsel with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms.Simmee Kumari, Advts. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »