Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopi Nisha Mallah vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~56 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2018 CRL.REV.P. 561/2017 + GOPI NISHA MALLAH versus STATE (NCT OF DXELHI) BAIL APPLN. 152/2018 GOPI NISHA MALLAH versus Advocates who appeared in this case: THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh with Ms. Adit Mittal and Mr. Nakul Pathania. Ms. Anita Abhraham, APP for State. SI Pushpendra, PS Bara Hindu Rao. JUDGMENT3001.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 561/2017 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 25.07.2017, whereby, the CRL.REV.P. 561/2017 BAIL APPLN. 152/2018 Page 1 of 4 defence evidence was closed.2. It is contended that 25.07.2017 was the first date fixed for leading defence evidence. The petitioner was in custody and was produced from judicial custody on the said date. However, till 2:37 pm (as noticed by ...
Asha Ram Tyagi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12129/2015 ASHA RAM TYAGI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhimanyu Singh Khatri, versus Advocate UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Chiranjiv Kumar, Adv. for UOI. Ms.Ruchika Rathi, Adv. for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Ms.Ruchika Rathi, counsel for the LAC submits that counter affidavit is ready. She has handed over the same in the Court today. Copy has been supplied.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner to the extent of 1/4th share falling in Khasra No.6(0-10), 60/(0-12), 60/(0-12) measuring 01 bigha and 14 biswas situate...
Ashwani Goyal vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~19. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 847/2018 1. ASHWANI GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Saeed Qadri, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner, a Chartered Accountant by profession; suffering from ORDER3001.2018 a locomotor disability, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.09.2017 passed by the Tribunal, dismissing his O.A. No.4337/2015, praying inter alia for quashing a Gazette Notification dated 29.08.2015, published by the respondent No.1/Ministry of Law and Justice, appointing 12 candidates against 20 vacancies of Judicial Members and 15 candidates against 28 vacancies of Accountant Members in the ITAT, wherein his name did not feature. Further, the petitioner had sought directions to the respondents to consider appointing him as an Accountant...
Sh. h.c. Sachdeva & Ors. Vs.shri Ved Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~OS-1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 1096/2008 Date of decision:30. 01.2018 SH. H.C. SACHDEVA & ORS. Through Mr.Sudeep Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs Versus SHRI VED PRAKASH ..... Defendant Through Mr.Rajeshwar K.Gupta, Adv. for D-2 to 7, 9 to 14 and 16-17 Mr.Arun Nischal, Adv. for D-8A to 8D Ms.Meenakshi, Adv. for D-15 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.118(u/O7R11CPC filed by D-15) and IA No.118(u/O7R11filed by D-2 to 7, 9 to 14 and 16 and17) 1. IA No.11880/2017 is filed on behalf of defendant No.15 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint in view of the fact that it is barred by limitation under Article 58 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963. IA No.11879/2017 is filed by defendants No.2 to 7, 9 to 14 and 16 and 17 seeking the same relief.2. The plaintiff has filed a suit for possession, recovery of money and damages and has also prayed for a declaration that the various sale deeds executed in favour of defenda...
Jyotsna Suri vs.commissioner of Wealth Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. 01.2018 + WTA52008 LALIT SURI THR. LRS JYOTSNA SURI COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI Versus + WTA62008 JYOTSNA SURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI I + WTA72008 JYOTSNA SURI Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX DELHI I + WTA82008 LALIT SURI THR. LRS JYOTSNA SURI COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus . Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS . Appellant .... Respondent . Appellant .... Respondent . Appellant ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Advocate, for appellants. Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The questions of law framed in these four appeals are as follows: IN WTA52008 (1) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) erred in giving a finding that these assets were not inclu...
Swapan Kumar Pal vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 30, 2018 W.P.(C) 866/2018 & CMs 3673-74/2018 SWAPAN KUMAR PAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prasenjit Keswani, Mr. Manu Beri and Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms. Rhea Verma and Mr. Yuvraj Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.3-NBCC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Vide impugned order of 22nd January, 2018 (Annexure P-1) petitioners case for extension of his tenure has not been recommended to Public Enterprises Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as PESB) and petitioner has been directed to hand over the charge of Director (Finance), NBCC (India) Limited to Sh. R.K. Arora w.e.f. 1st February, 2018.2. Learned counsel for petitioner assails impugned order on the ground that non-extension of petitioners tenure has not been app...
Daya Ram Mittal and Ors. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7439/2016 DAYA RAM MITTAL AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Alok Dev and Ms.Richa Singh, versus Advts. UOI AND ORS. Through: Mr.Akhil Mittal, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS... RESPONDENTS no.1 and 3. Mr.M.K.Singh, Adv. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of the petitioners comprised in Khasra no.22/2measuring 04 bighas and 04 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Begumpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ...
Jitender vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~46 to 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS KAMLESH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS JITENDER GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS + W.P.(C) 1371/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1390/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1391/2017 CHAMAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1448/2017 CHARAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1457/2017 versus Present: Mr.Sunil K.Goel and Mr.Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate for the SATBIR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner petitioners in all the matters. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for the LAC/L&B deptt. in all the matters. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for the DDA in W.P.(C) 1371/2017 & W.P.(C) 1448/2017. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, standing counsel with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms.Simmee Kumari, Advts. ...
Kanwar Singh Yadav vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 722/2018, CM APPL.3075-3076/2018 KANWAR SINGH YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Joydeep Sarma, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC for Resp-1with Mr. Suraj Kumar and Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocates along with Mr. Prashant, deptartmental representative, DFF Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA ORDER3001.2018 % 1.2. Counter affidavit is taken on record. The petitioner complains that the rejection of its bid (made in response to the Notice Inviting Tender - NIT - for catering and canteen services at the Siri Fort Cultural Complex) was arbitrary and unjustified. The short ground urged is that the rejection of its bid was on the ground that the experience certificate furnished by it in response to the NIT merely referred to its past experience in running and manag...
Mankind Pharma Limited vs.mankind Advertising of No 148, Valluvarkotta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~OS-2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :30.01.2018 CS(OS) 465/2014, I.A. 3130/2014 and I.A. 6471/2017 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Ishanki Gupta and Mr.Harsh Vardhan, Advs. versus MANKIND ADVERTISING OF NO148 VALLUVARKOTTAM HIGH ROAD Through Defendant ex-parte ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CS(OS) 465/2014 1. The present suit is filed seeking permanent injunction for passing off, infringement of trade mark MANKIND and rendition of accounts etc.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the trade mark MANKIND as a part of the plaintiffs trading style was adopted by the plaintiff company in the year 1986. On 03.07.1991, the plaintiff was incorporated as a private limited company with the trading style Mankind Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Subsequently, it was converted into a Public Ltd. Company. It is contended that the plaintiff group is widely appreciated for immense contribution in the field of pharmace...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »