Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Dbs Realty vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2018 W.P.(C) 11829/2016 and & CM No.46645/2016 % + M/S. DBS REALTY ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr Rishi Agarwala, Ms Niyati Kohli and Mr Karan Luthra. Mr Digvijay Rai and Mr Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates for R-2/AAI with Mr Raj Kumar, Jt. GM (ATM), AAI and Ms Sonal, JE (Law), AAI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of 1. the Slum Rehabilitation developing real estate. On 14.02.2008, SRA) had issued a public notice inviting Authority (hereafter expression of interest from land owners/developers interested in undertaking a scheme as per the Development Control Regulation of Great Mumbai, 1991. This was, inter alia, to create additional housing W.P.(C) 11829/2016 Page 1 of 18 stock for r...
Anjumnissa vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~62 & 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + ANJUMNISSA CRL.M.C. 1070/2017 CRL.REV.P. 192/2017 Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2018 ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. Arshdeep Singh with Mr. Hitesh Rai, Advocates. Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for State. Mr. Nikas Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3001.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 1070/2017 & CRL.REV.P. 192/2017, Crl.M.A.4475- 76/2017 (stay) 1.2. Reply filed by the respondent Nos.2 to 4 is taken on record. By these petitions, the petitioner impugns Order On Charge dated 03.11.2015, passed by the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate discharging Mohd. Asif (Brother-in-law) of the commission of offence punishable under Section 498-A/406 IPC.... Petitioner is further CRL.M.C. 1070/2017 CRL.REV.P. 192/2017 Page 1 of 5 aggrieved by order dated 03.12.2016 of the Rev...
Ajay Kumar vs.land Acquisition Collector & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~19 * % + W.P.(C) 8674/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 AJAY KUMAR Through: Mr.R.S.Rana, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Siddharth Panda, Adv. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Zahid Hanief, proxy counsel for Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit is stated to have been filed in the Registry on 29.01.2018. Let another copy of the same be supplied to the counsel for the petitioner.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a direction to respondent no.1/LAC (North) to forward the reference of the acquired land bearing Khasra Nos.min (2-12) and min (2-12) situated in the revenue estate of villa...
Satbir vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~46 to 50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS KAMLESH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS JITENDER GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS + W.P.(C) 1371/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1390/2017 versus + W.P.(C) 1391/2017 CHAMAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1448/2017 CHARAN SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. + W.P.(C) 1457/2017 versus Present: Mr.Sunil K.Goel and Mr.Lalit Kumar Rawal, Advocate for the SATBIR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner petitioners in all the matters. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for the LAC/L&B deptt. in all the matters. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for the DDA in W.P.(C) 1371/2017 & W.P.(C) 1448/2017. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, standing counsel with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms.Simmee Kumari, Advts. ...
Dashmesh Hospital & Ors vs.harpal Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h January, 2018 C.R.P. 31/2015 and CM43532015 DASHMESH HOSPITAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Daljinder Singh, Mr. Udit and Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Advocates versus HARPAL SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh Popli, Mr. Mukul Girdhar and Mr. Anuj Yadav, Advocates for R-1 to 5 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Advocate for R-6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand invokes the revisional jurisdiction of this court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to bring a challenge to the order dated 22.01.2015 passed by the Additional District Judge on the application under Section 92 of the CPC presented by the first to fifth respondents herein seeking leave to institute a civil suit (CS812014) for necessary reliefs concerning the second petitioner, a public charitable trust alleging mis-management of i...
Usman Alias Kale and Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : January 30th, 2018 CRL.A. 93/2015 USMAN ALIAS KALE AND ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Amit Srivastav, Advocate for appellant No.1 and 5. Ms. Amita Gupta, Mr. Rugha Ram, Ms. Yadav, Advocates for appellant No.2 and 4. Priti Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Upender Yogesh, Katyayini, Advocates for appellant Iqbal. Ms. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Ms.Kamini Gupta, Police Station South Campus, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI Crl.A.93/2015 Page 1of 48 JUDGMENT P.S. TEJI, J.The present appeal has been filed by the convicts/ 1. appellants (hereinafter referred to as the appellants), namely, Usman @ Kale, Shamshad @ Khutkan, Iqbal @ Billi, Shahid @ Billi and Kamruddin @ Kamru under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 14.10.2014 whereby the appellants have been convicted under Section 365/34,...
Gopi Nisha Mallah vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~56 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 01.2018 CRL.REV.P. 561/2017 + GOPI NISHA MALLAH versus STATE (NCT OF DXELHI) BAIL APPLN. 152/2018 GOPI NISHA MALLAH versus Advocates who appeared in this case: THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Akhand Pratap Singh with Ms. Adit Mittal and Mr. Nakul Pathania. Ms. Anita Abhraham, APP for State. SI Pushpendra, PS Bara Hindu Rao. JUDGMENT3001.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 561/2017 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 25.07.2017, whereby, the CRL.REV.P. 561/2017 BAIL APPLN. 152/2018 Page 1 of 4 defence evidence was closed.2. It is contended that 25.07.2017 was the first date fixed for leading defence evidence. The petitioner was in custody and was produced from judicial custody on the said date. However, till 2:37 pm (as noticed by ...
Manpreet Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:30. h January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11230/2015 MANPREET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sumeer Sodhi and Mr.Arjun versus Nanda, Advts. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Uniyal and Mr.Dhawal Uniyal, advts. for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Pawan Mathur, standing counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has not been filed despite time having been granted since 04.12.2015 and various opportunities granted from time to time. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court today.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of 5/6th und...
Suman Chhabra vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment :30. h January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8058/2017 SUMAN CHHABRA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Richa Oberoi and Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh and Mr. Ajay Birbal, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPLN. No.33171/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to just all exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W. P. (C) 8058/2017 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner i.e. 6050 Square Yards out of Part of Khasra No.668 (1210 Sq. Yards) and W.P.(C) 8058/2017 Page 1 of 8 Khasra No.669 (4840 Sq. Yards), ...
Dr. Suraj Munjal vs.chandan Munjal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.682/2017 and I.A. No.15285/2017 (stay) + % DR. SURAJ MUNJAL30h January, 2018 Through: Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Advocate. versus ..... Plaintiff CHANDAN MUNJAL & ORS. ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. When this suit came up for hearing for admission on 19.12.2017, the following order was passed:-"This Court is so observing because inheritance of ancestral Allowed, subject to just exceptions. IA stands disposed of. IA No.15284/2017 1.2. CS(OS) 682/2017 & IA No.15284/2017 (u/O39 Rules 1&2 CPC) 3. In my prima facie opinion, the subject suit is not maintainable and would be hit by the ratio of the judgment delivered by this Court in the case of Surender Kumar vs. Dhani Ram, 227 (2016) DLT217 4. properties after 1956 does no longer create an HUF/Joint Hindu Family. For a Joint Hindu Family/HUF to come into existence after 1956 for the first time, it is ne...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »