Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sharwan Kumar Vigmal vs.general Manager (Nw-Ii)/(Appointing Authority) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 31, 2018 W.P.(C) 7578/2017 SHARWAN KUMAR VIGMAL Through: Mr. Shanti Prakash, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus GENERAL MANAGER (NW-II)/(APPOINTING AUTHORITY) STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal, Mr. Siddharth Sangal and Mr. Abhay Kumar Tayal, Advocates for respondent-SBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL)... Petitioner is Deputy Manager in Middle Management Grade Scale- II with respondent-Bank, who had sought promotion from MMGS-II to MMGS-III in the year 2017-18. Vide Announcement of 1st July, 2017, written test for the said promotion stood waived and the list of Zone of Selection (Annexure P-5) was drawn on 12th July, 2017 and thereafter, interviews were held and the Final Result (Annexure P-7) was declared on 31st July, 2017. Since petitioner was not in the zone of consideration because he did not have mandatory two years rural service to his credit, t...
Chander Parkash Jain vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:31. t January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9571/2015 CHANDER PARKASH JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar Garg and Ms. Pooja Yadav, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Viveknand Mishra and Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Siddharth Panda, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in Khasra nos.304(1-06), 306 min (0-10) total measuring 01 bigha 16 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Pul Prahladpur, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair C...
Sunil Kumar & Anr. Vs.delhi Development Authority Through: Vice Chairm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2018 LPA4792013 & CM Nos. 10527/2013, 10528/2013, 20751/2013 SUNIL KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH: VICE CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent + LPA4812013 & CM Nos. 10532/2013, 10533/2013 DHARAMBIR SINGH SAINI AND ANR ..... Appellants versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent + LPA4822013 & CM Nos. 10535/2013, 10536/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellants ..... Respondent + LPA4832013 & CM Nos. 10538/2013, 10539/2013 PRITAM SINGH SAINI AND ANR versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellants ..... Respondent + LPA4842013 & CM Nos. 10541/2013, 10542/2013 HARI CHAND SAINI & ANR versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellants ..... Respondent + LPA4852013 & CM Nos. 10544/2013, 10545/2013 LPA No.479/2013 and connected matters Page 1 of 38 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellants ..... Respondent + ...
Priya Harshvardhan vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1458/2012 PRIYA HARSHVARDHAN Judgment reserved on:24. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:31. 01.2018 ..... Appellant Through Appellant with his counsel Mr. Kulwant Saroop, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the + CRL.A. 42/2013 & Crl. M.A. No.8419/2016 RAKESH SINGH @ HARKESH SINGH State ..... Appellant Through Appellant with his counsel Mr. Kulwant Saroop, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellants have impugned the judgment and order on sentence dated 26.10.2012 and 03.11.2012 respectively wherein the appellants stood convicted and thereafter sentenced. Appellant Rakesh Singh had been convicted under Sections 342/506/385 as also Section 365 read with Section Crl. Appeal Nos.1458/2012 & 42/2013 Page 1 of 21 120-B of the IPC. He had been acquitted of the offence un...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.vinod
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. h January, 2018 Date of decision :31. t January, 2018 RFA3012015 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla & Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates. (M-9810080772) versus VINOD Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment/order dated 1. 6th February, 2015 by which the suit recovery filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff bank (hereinafter, Plaintiff bank) was dismissed. The primary ground on which the suit had been dismissed was that the Plaintiff bank had failed to file the original loan recall notice dated 12th March, 2014 in the Trial court. for Brief Background The Respondent/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) approached the 2. Plaintiff bank for financing of the purchase of a vehicle under loan cum hypothecation scheme for a sum of Rs.4,35,000/-. The Defendant agreed to repay the loan amount in 59 equal mo...
Annu Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:31. t January, 2018 CM(M) 809/2016 and CM305662016 and 30568/2016 VIRENDER SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout, Mr. R. Godara and Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pahak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advs. for R-1 Mr. B.S. Kharb, Adv. for R-2 to 6 + CM(M) 153/2017 and CM50512017 ANNU SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. B.R. Kaushik, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pahak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Adv. for R-1 Mr. B.S. Kharb, Adv. for R-2 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The controversy which is subject matter of these two petitions arises out of an award of compensation that was passed in the wake of CM(M) 809/2016 & 153/2017 Page 1 of 4 acquisition of la...
Gnct of Delhi vs.bhikamber
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~19. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 840/2018, CM APPL. 3575-76/2018 and CAV722018 GNCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms. Minal Sehgal, Advocate versus BHIKAMBER Through: Mr. Anil Singal, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER3101.2018 1. The petitioner/Delhi Police is aggrieved by the order dated 14.03.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, allowing O.A. No.1504/2013 filed by the respondent, who was working on the post of a Head Constable and had prayed for quashing and setting aside of a show cause notice dated 12.04.2013, issued by the petitioner, calling upon him to explain as to why he should not be reverted to the rank of a Constable and his name removed from the Promotion List A w.e.f. 25.01.2008.2. For proper appreciation of the case, a brief reference to the facts is considered necessary.3. In the year 1994, the respond...
President‟s Secretariat vs.subhash Chandra Agarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8393/2016 & CM No.34715/2016 PRESIDENTS SECRETARIAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, Advocate. versus SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr Amit Khemka and Ms Nidhi Bhuwania, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3101.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 11.05.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Central Information Commissioner (hereafter the CIC) allowing the respondents second appeal under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act). The controversy involved in the present petition relates to two queries raised by the respondent in his application dated 16.04.2014 filed under the Act. The said queries are reproduced below:-"(4) Did Presidents Secretariat and/or others raise security and/or others concerned on allowing W.P.(C) 8396/2016 Page 1 of 6 residential complex at ...
Sh. Mahipal Singh & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11238/2015 Date of Judgment :31st January, 2018 SH. MAHIPAL SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arun Kumar Kaushik, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Santosh Prasad Chaurasiya, G.P. for respondent no.1/UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for DDA. Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate for DMRC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has not been filed despite time having been granted since 04.12.2015.2. Mr.Jain, learned counsel for the LAC submits that counter affidavit is ready. Copy of the same has been supplied to counsel for the petitioners. The counter affidavit is also handed over in Court, which is taken on record. W.P.(C) 11238/2015 Page 1 of 6 3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by...
Md. Ilyas vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment :31. t January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7646/2016 MD. ILYAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajmangal Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate .....Respondents for LAC/L&B. Ms. Mrinalini Sen Gupta, Mr. Shatrajit Banerji and Mr. Tanmay Yadav, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Faisal Zafar and Mr. Iqra Meraj and Mr. Farhan, Advocates for applicant in CM APPLN. 3661/2018. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPLN. No.3661/2018 (Under order I Rule 10 CPC) This is an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC which has been filed by applicant Mohd. Meraj, who claims himself to be real brother of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a proper and necessary party and he has 1/4th share in the land which is the subject matter of the present writ petition. W.P.(C) 7646/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »