Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravish Kumar Khosla vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 45/2018 RAVISH KUMAR KHOSLA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37...
Meena S. Gupta and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:17. h January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2994/2016 MEENA S. GUPTA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Richa Oberoi Banati, Advocates. and Mr.Ankit versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Roshan Lal Goel and Ms.Anju respondent for Gupta, Advocates no.1/UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Ms.Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocate for respondent no.3/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been filed in the Registry today; the same has been called to the Court.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of the petitioners admeasuring 605 W.P. (C) No.2994/2016 Pa...
Raghunath vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :23. d NOVEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :17. h JANUARY, 2018 FAO2842008, CM120352008 & 1035/2010 RAGHUNATH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Advocate with Ms.Deepali Dwivedi & Mr.Vaibhav Mishra, Advocates. + versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms.Manisha Agrawal Narain, Advocate for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present appeal has been preferred by Raghunath (hereinafter the appellant) under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter the Act) to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 19.05.2008 of learned Addl. District Judge in Probate Case No.95/whereby the respondent No.2 Bharat Bhushan was granted Letters of Administration regarding the property bearing No.B-107, Subhadra Colony, Delhi, bequeathed to him by his late father Roshan Lal by a Will dated 03.03.1997 (Ex.PW-1/1). The appeal is contested by respondent No.2. FAO2842008 Page 1 of 8 2. I have he...
Fight for Human Rights vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
versus UNION OF INDIA $~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)11523/2016 % Date of Decision:17. h January, 2018 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through: Mr. K.R. Chitra, Adv. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM Nos.1938-1939/2018 1. Notice.2. Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate, who is representing Mr. Gaurang Kanth, ld. CGSC, accepts notice for the respondent.3. Having regard to the nature of the applications, ld. counsel for the parties are orally heard.4. By way of CM No.1938/2018, the petitioner seeks condonation of delay of 27 days in filing the application for restoration (CM No.1939/2018) of the writ petition, which was dismissed in default by an order dated 20th November, 2017.5. For the reasons stated in the application, we are satisfied that W.P.(C) No.11523/2016 Page 1 of 10 the applicant...
Saigal Holdings (P) Ltd & Anr vs.asa Nand Khurana & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h January, 2018 CM(M) 122/2016 and CM45402016 SAIGAL HOLDINGS (P) LTD & ANR ..... PETITIONERS Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia and Mr. Ravi Awasthi, Advocates versus ASA NAND KHURANA & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.R. Gupta and Mr. Nitin Gupta, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Anil Panwar, CGSC with Mr. Abhimanyu Chauhan and Mr. Pulkit Bajaj, Advocates for R-2 Mr. T.S. Ahuja and Mr. Varun Ahuja, Advocates for R-3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand has been preferred seeking to assail the order dated 02.12.2015 whereby the application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), moved by the first respondent who is the plaintiff of the civil suit (CS no.247/2014) was allowed, the prime exception taken in the present petition being that such amendments were impermissible, the move therefor having come after the trial had commenced, the amended pleadings having the effect o...
The Motor & General Finance L T D vs.bravo Hotels pvt.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:17. h January, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 532/2017 THE MOTOR & GENERAL FINANCE L T D Through : Mr.Sunil Magon, Adv. ........ Petitioner BRAVO HOTELS PVT.LTD versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr.V.K.Garg, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Narender Yadav, Mr.Vivek Sharma and Ms.Noopur Dubey, Advs. Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.288/2018 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner today presses for appointment of a receiver to take the custody of the moveable stock of the respondent lying at the subject premises because of the blatant violation of the orders of this Court by the respondent from time to time and even contempt petition is pending against the respondent.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to an order dated 08.04.2016 in petition No.221/2016 filed under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 wherein during its pendency the learned counsel for the r...
Aneesh Sharma vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 34/2018 ANEESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37/2018 ...
Anita Jain vs.ashok Kumar Arora & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h January, 2018 CM(M) 72/2018 and CM19241925/2018 ANITA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant K. Sud, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.N. Dubey, Ms. Vaishali Soni and Mr. Honey Khanna, Advocates Versus ASHOK KUMAR ARORA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Through: ........ RESPONDENTS 1. The petitioner is the plaintiff of the civil suit (CS120016) instituted by her, inter alia, for recovery of possession of the subject property, admittedly originally owned by Raj Kumar Jain, who has since died. The petitioner claims to be distantly related to the said Mr. Raj Kumar Jain. The suit, as presented, was directed against the first respondent Ashok Kumar Arora who statedly had been inducted as tenant in the subject property by Raj Kumar Jain during his lifetime. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the subject property, after the death of Raj Kumar Jain having inherited the rights under a Will statedly left ...
Jagdish Prasad Shukla vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 44/2018 JAGDISH PRASAD SHUKLA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. ...
The Kangra Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs.ms. Seema Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:17. 01.2018 W.P. (C) 10740/2017 & CM Nos.43996-97/2017 THE KANGRA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD......... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Arora & Mr. Rajat Arora, Advs. versus MS. SEEMA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. Feeling aggrieved by the decision of the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-X Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Industrial Adjudicator) deciding the preliminary issue whether management had conducted a fair and proper inquiry against the workman?. against them, the petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Articleof the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari for setting aside/quashing the order dated 05.08.2017.2. The respondent was appointed as an Office Assistant with the petitioner bank vide office memorandum dated 16.04.1996 and W.P (C) 10740/2017 Page 1 of 5 later on she was po...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »