Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rinku Das vs.state Govt. Of Nct Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 241/2018 Judgment delivered on:17. 01.2018 RINKU DAS ........ Petitioner versus STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS : Mr. Tarun Nanda, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Arun Kumar Sharma, APP for State. SI Jitendra Kumar, PS Govindpuri. : JUDGMENT1701.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 934/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 241/2018 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 22.09.2017, whereby, respondent No.2 has been enlarged on bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there was no ground made out for grant of bail and more so in view of the fact that the earlier application for grant of CRL.M.C. 241/2018 Page 1 of 3 bail by the respondent No.2 had been rejected and there was no change in circumstances.2. Further, it is contended that in the impugned o...
Dharam Pal vs.chairman Cum Managing Director Air India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 17, 2018 W.P.(C) 11793/2016 & CM464972016 DHARAM PAL Through: Ms. Kiran Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR AIR INDIA AND ANR Through: Ms. Suruchi Suri, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned order of 10th November, 2016 (Annexure P-1 colly.) directs holding of de novo inquiry against petitioner, who is Assistant Manager-Commercial with respondent-Air India while invoking Regulation 106 of Air India Employees' Service Regulations. Consequential order of 7th December, 2016 directing initiation of de novo inquiry is also under challenge.2. The charge against petitioner was of reissuing a ticket on SIN- DEL-SIN Sector by misusing the sign-in code of Ms. Tarminder Kaur. On the said charge, petitioner was departmentally tried and was exonerated by Disciplinary Authority. Again on the same very charge, de novo inquiry has been or...
Kamal Kumar Jain and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 2700/2016 Date of Judgment 17th January, 2018 KAMAL KUMAR JAIN & ANR. Through: Mr. Irshad Ahmed, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Namisha Gupta and Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Akshita Manocha and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate LAC/L&B. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings are liable to lapse with respect to the land of the petitioner measuring 3 Bigha 16 Biswas approximately 3800 Sq. Yards out of Khasra No.Min. (1-16) and Min. (2-00) situated in the revenue estate of Village Ranekhera, Delhi now known as Bhagy...
Hps Ahluwalia vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~32 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 33/2018 HPS AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37/2018 ...
Virendra Saklani vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~42 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 43/2018 VIRENDRA SAKLANI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37/20...
Chandra Sengar and Anr vs.union Bank of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
# 31 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:20. 12.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:17. 01.2018 W.P.(C) 11455/2017 & C.M. Nos.46707/2017 & 46708/2017 CHANDRA SENGAR AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners For the Respondent : Mr. B.R. Sharma, Advocate : None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT DEEPA SHARMA, J.1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assails an order dated 18.12.2017 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Miscellaneous Appeal No.535/2017, arising out of SA No.109/2016 (DRT- III, Delhi), whereby the said appeal was dismissed for want of pre-deposit. DRAT), (for short W.P.(C) 11455/2017 Page 1 of 6 limit 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would urge that respondent No.1/Bank sanctioned a credit to the responde...
Raj Nath Khosla & Anr. Vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 47/2018 RAJ NATH KHOSLA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P...
Capt Vikrant vs.rosetta Williams
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS)No.55/2017 & CM Nos.7554-55/2017 % Date of decision :17. h January, 2018 CAPT VIKRANT ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput and Ms. Sakshi Sharma, Advs. versus ROSETTA WILLIAMS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Rohan Thawani and Ms. Gunjan Ahuja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.7555/2017 (delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application is allowed. FAO(OS)No.55/2017 1. The record of CS(OS)No.2884/2015 has been received.2. We have heard Mr. Raj Kumar Rajput, ld. counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rohan Thawani, ld. counsel for the respondent.3. By way of the present appeal, the appellant has assailed the order dated 24th October, 2016 rejecting the I.A.No.1785/2016 (under FAO(OS)No.55/2017 Page 1 of 5 Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC) which had been filed by the ap...
Ran Singh vs.lilu Ram (Deceased) Thr Lrs.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h January, 2018 RC.REV. 204/2016 and CM APPL.25555/2016 RAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P.Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lalit Choudhary, Ms. Mehak Kalra, Ms. Manisa Mehta, Ms. Vaishali Tanwar, & Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Advocates versus LILU RAM (DECEASED) THR LRS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Devinder Singh Khatana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner is in occupation of premises described as shop in property bearing No.B-20, Gali No.1, Shera Mohalla, Garhi, East of Kailash, New Delhi. Concededly, he was inducted as a tenant by Lilu Ram, who has since died, his estate now being represented by the respondents. Lilu Ram, during his life time, had instituted a case (EV No.6A/2014) seeking order of eviction against the petitioner on the ground of bona fide need invoking the provision contained in Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Admittedly, the petitione...
Sarabhjeet Singh Sa Whney vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 35/2018 SARABHJEET SINGH SAWHNEY ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB....
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »