Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manishi Mohan Sanwal & Anr. Vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 49/2018 MANISHI MOHAN SANWAL & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ...
Subhash Chandra Mishra vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9798/2017 1. SUBHASH CHANDRA MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey, Mr. Prashant Umrao and Mr. Vishal Vishwadeesh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % The petitioner has filed the present petition challenging an order dated ORDER1701.2018 07.06.2017, passed by the respondent No.4/Commandant, CISF, dismissing his appeal against the order dated 06.05.2009 passed by the respondent No.5/Assistant Commandant, CISF. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 10.07.2017 passed by the respondent No.3/Deputy Inspector General, CISF, dismissing the review petition filed by him against the order dated 18.02.2012, passed by the Appellate Authority.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents opposes the petition on the ground that the same is hopelessly barred by limitation. S...
Ramesh Chander Goel vs.daya Kishan Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~10 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 270/2017 & CM No.36766/2017 % Date of decision :17. h January, 2018 RAMESH CHANDER GOEL ..... Appellant Through : Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. DAYA KISHAN GOEL versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Manish K. Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal assails an order dated 12th September, 2017 passed in CS(OS) 1239/2008 whereby the learned Single Judge has directed that even though the affidavit by way of evidence filed on behalf of the defendant is not strictly in compliance of the Joint Registrars order dated 4th August, 2016, the evidence of the defendant be proceeded with.2. The learned Single Judge has further directed that in case the appellant/plaintiff objects to the contents of the affidavit, the Joint Registrar shall record objections which shall be considered at the time of final disposal of...
Sanjay Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~44 * + W.P.(C) 458/2018 & C.M.No.1989/2018 SANJAY KUMAR Through: Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI Through: Mr.Vijay Joshi, Sr.Panel Counsel with Mr.D.D.Ram (AC CISF) ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER1701.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 01.02.2003, passed by % 1. the Disciplinary Authority i.e. respondent No.5/Senior Commandant, CISF, removing him from service, the order dated 24.10.2003, passed by the Appellate Authority i.e. respondent No.4/Dy.Inspector General, CISF, rejecting his appeal after the order of removal from service and the order dated 26.02.2010, passed by the respondent No.3/Inspector General, CISF, rejecting his mercy petition. The petitioner prays that he be reinstated in service from 01.02.2003, with all consequential benefits.2. The facts of the case as elicited from the petition are that the petitioner ...
Madhur Jain vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 37/2018 MADHUR JAIN Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal ........ Petitioner Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37/2018 AR...
Vinod Kumar Dhall vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 46/2018 VINOD KUMAR DHALL ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37/2...
Jain Riceland Pvt Ltd vs.sagar Overseas
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:17. h January, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 214/2017 & C.M.44823/2017 JAIN RICELAND PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mohan Vidhani, Mr.Rahul Vidhani and Mr.Ashish Singh, Advts. along with Mr.Bhupender Jain, Director of the appellant company. ..... Respondent SAGAR OVERSEAS versus Through: Mr.Hitender Kapur and Mr.Sagar Chawla, Advts. alongwith Mr.Varun Modi, partner of the respondent company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 13 (1) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 read with Order 43 (1) (r) and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for setting aside the order dated 30.10.2017 by which I.A.7978/2016 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC has been dismissed and I.A.573/2017 filed under Order 39 Rule 4 o...
Nagarjuna Agrichem Limited vs.the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:05. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:17. h January, 2018 ARB.P. 347/2017 NAGARJUNA AGRICHEM LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Saurav Agarwal, Mr.Trinath Tadakamala, Mr.Debarshi Dutta, Ms.Shifa Nagar and Mr.Sushal Tiwari, Advs. versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Amrit Singh and Mr.Arjun Masters, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. a) The brief facts as alleged by the petitioner are: On 31.03.2012 the petitioner took Fire policy-Standard Fire and Special Peril Policy. This policy contained an arbitration clause 12. It is also known as material damage policy as it insures the materials that get damaged in fire incident. On payment of additional premium, the petitioner also took coverage of Consequential Loses of Profit for the same period so as to insure the petitioner against loss of profit in business arising as a result of ARB.P.347/2017 Page 1 of 11 + damage ...
Inderjeet Kaur & Ors vs.ekta Gulati & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"17th January, 2018 + CM (M) 68/2018 INDERJEET KAUR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate. Versus EKTA GULATI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) CM Nos.1802-1803/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 68/2018 & CM No.1801/2018 1. The petition seeks to challenge the order dated 16.12.2017 passed by the Additional District Judge on the file of Execution case No.405/2017 which was taken out by the first, second and third respondents herein. The execution proceedings arise out of Suit No.27/2010, which had been instituted by the first respondent (the plaintiff).2. From the observations made in the copies of the judgment dated 31.01.2012 (Annexure P-1), judgment dated 16.08.2012 in RFA No.166/2012(Annexure P-2), order dated 03.03.2016 of the Supreme CM (M) No.68/2018 Page 1 of 5 Court in Civil Appeal No.7332/2013 (Annexure P-3) ...
Green Infra Wind Solutions Limited vs.regen Powertech Private Ltd & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~29, 30 & 31 * (Common Orders) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision:17. h January, 2018 FAO(OS) 8/2018 MULANUR RENEWABLE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sankh Sengupta with Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. versus REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Neevanandham Rajagopal, Mr. Anush Raajan, Mr. S. Aravindan and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. FAO(OS) 9/2018 GREEN INFRA WIND SOLUTIONS LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sankh Sengupta with Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. versus REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Neevanandham Rajagopal, Mr. Anush Raajan, Mr. S. Aravindan and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. FAO(OS) Nos.8, 9 & 10/2018 Page 1 of 6 FAO(OS) 10/2018 MULANUR RENEWABLE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sankh Sengupta with Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Adv...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »