Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bar Council of India vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. 01.2018 + W.P.(C) 4226/2017, C.M. APPL.39213/2017 BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. B.B. Jain, Sh. Abhay Jain and Sh. Amitabh Marwaha, Advocates. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Madhu Tewatia, Advocate. Sh. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Sh. R.A. Iyer, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate, for Respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Facts 1. The... Petitioner, (hereafter BCI) challenges the assessment order dated 01.03.2016 made by the first respondent i.e. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC), calculation sheet dated 02.03.2016 and notice u/s 154(1) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (the Act) dated 26.05.2016 pertaining to the property of the petitioner used as its offices. BCI also challenges SDMCs communication dated 04.03.2017 addressed to it as...
Vinod Prakash Joshi vs.nirmala Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :18. h January, 2018 VINOD PRAKASH JOSHI RFA3832017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rama Shanker & Ms. Seema Sharma, Advocates (M-9967110041). versus NIRMALA DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Bhatia, Advocate (M- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH981131125). Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) RFA3832017 & CM APPLs. 14644/2017 (Stay), 1011/2018 (for withdrawal of amount ) in favour of 1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) impugning the judgment and decree dated 22nd December, 2016 passed by the Trial court, whereby the suit for recovery of Rs.5,90,178/- was decreed the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) and against the Defendant. Brief Background 2. The Plaintiff is the proprietor of the M/s Upkar Steel Traders which was engaged in the business of iron and steel. It was stated that the Plaintiff supplied material i.e., iron and steel plates to the Defendant as per ...
Ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited vs.m/s Saisudhir Energy Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO (OS) No.275/2016 Reserved on :16. h October, 20 18th January, 2018 Date of decision NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sangal, Ms. Anindita Deka& Ms. Isha Gupta, Advocates. Versus M/S SAISUDHIR ENERGY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. C. Mohan Rao & Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Advocates. FAO (OS) No.281/2016 M/S SAISUDHIR ENERGY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. C. Mohan Rao & Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus M/S NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sangal, Ms. Anindita Deka& Ms. Isha Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA FAO (OS) Nos. 275/2016&281/2016 Page 1 of 30 SANJIV KHANNA, J.: NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited has filed FAO(OS) 275/2016, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 10 of the Delh...
Punjab National Bank vs.senior Exports and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) No.1558/2016 + % PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK17h January, 2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Hashmat Nabi and Mr. Abhinav Thareja, Advocates. versus SENIOR EXPORTS AND ORS. ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff/bank namely Punjab National Bank has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.1,89,66,123/- along with interest against a total of ten defendants. Suit amount is claimed on account of the fraud played upon the plaintiff/bank whereby a total amount of Rs. 1.17 crores through purported Telegraphic Transfers was credited to the bank account of the defendant no.2 in the name of defendant no.1 and thereafter such amount being fraudulently withdrawn by defendant No.2 or used by him for payments made to defendant nos. 3 and 5 to 7. The entire suit amount is claimed from the defendant nos. CS(COMM) No.1558/2016 Page 1 of 8 1, 2 and 4 and essentia...
Commissioner of Income Tax Del vs.m/s Banaras House Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~R-17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:17. h January, 2018 ITA5832005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Puneet Rai, Adv. versus M/S BANARAS HOUSE LTD. Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue pertains to the Assessment Year 1996-1997 and arises from the order of the ITAT dated 29.11.2004 passed in ITA No.2074/Del/2000 in the case of M/s Banaras House Ltd.2. By order dated 02.08.2005, the appeal was admitted and the following substantial questions of law were framed:-"in the facts and1) Whether on the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that for the purposes of applying explanation (baa) below Sub- Section 4B of Section 80HHC and while deducting 90% of the receipt by way of interest from the profits of the business, it is only the 90% of the net interest remain after allowing a set of...
Mulanur Renewable Energy Private Limited vs.regen Powertech Private Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~29, 30 & 31 * (Common Orders) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision:17. h January, 2018 FAO(OS) 8/2018 MULANUR RENEWABLE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sankh Sengupta with Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. versus REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Neevanandham Rajagopal, Mr. Anush Raajan, Mr. S. Aravindan and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. FAO(OS) 9/2018 GREEN INFRA WIND SOLUTIONS LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sankh Sengupta with Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs. versus REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Mr. Neevanandham Rajagopal, Mr. Anush Raajan, Mr. S. Aravindan and Mr. Rahul Kukreja, Advs. FAO(OS) Nos.8, 9 & 10/2018 Page 1 of 6 FAO(OS) 10/2018 MULANUR RENEWABLE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sankh Sengupta with Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Adv...
Nancy Gill vs.state Represented By: Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
9# & 10#$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:17. h January, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 459/2016 NANCY GILL Represented by: Mr. Sidheshwar Rai, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus STATE REPRESENTED BY: GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Rajender, PS Karol Bagh. Mr. Kuldeep Goel, Advocate for complainant. + CRL.M.C. 3661/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.12974/2015 (Stay) NANCY GILL Represented by: Mr. Sidheshwar Rai, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State with Inspector Rajender, PS Karol Bagh. Mr. Kuldeep Goel, Advocate for complainant/respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By bail application No.450/2016, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail and by Crl. M.C. No.3661/2015, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.576/2015 under Section 420 IPC registered at PS Karol Bagh, New BAIL...
Dil Bahar Thr. His Parokar Ajmeri Begum vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26. 10.2017 Judgment delivered on:17. 01.2018 CRL.A. 86/2013 DIL BAHAR THR. HIS PAROKAR AJMERI BEGUM ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. J.M. Akbar and Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The appellant stands convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/3IPC in addition to the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC and Section 411 IPC vide judgment dated 09.11.2012 passed by the learned ASJ- FTC (Central) Tis Hazari Courts in SC No.01/2010 arising out of FIR1562009 registered at PS Old Delhi Railway Station. He has been sentenced vide order dated 23.11.2012 as follows: Crl.Appeal No.86/2013 Page 1 of 22 i) For offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, the above named convict is sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for life in addition to payment o...
Deepa Vig vs.emaar Mgf Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 39/2018 DEEPA VIG Through Mr.Dhruv Gupta and Mr.Ujjal ........ Petitioner Banerjee, Advs. versus EMAAR MGF CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms.Samapaha Biswal, Mr.Taran Gupta, Mr.Arjun Jain and Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA % ORDER1701.2018 In view of the order passed today by this Court in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 titled Sudesh Prabhakar vs. Emaar MGF Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and the connected petitions including the present one, the present petition is also dismissed with all pending applications with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in Arbitration Petition No.32/2018 is placed below. JANUARY17 2018 Arya NAVIN CHAWLA, J $~31 to 34 and 36 to 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17 th January, 2018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ARB.P. 32/2018 ARB.P. 33/2018 ARB.P. 34/2018 ARB.P. 35/2018 ARB.P. 37/2018 ARB....
Madhu & Anr. Vs.northern Railway & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:17. 01.2018 LPA6402017 MADHU & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Siza Nair Pal, Advocate with Appellant No.2 in person. Versus NORTHERN RAILWAY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh with Mr. Preet Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The appellants challenge an order by the Single Judge dismissing their writ petition. They sought directions to include their names in the medical card and privilege passes of Om Prakash Gorawara (hereafter, Gorawara) and to issue them separate cards. The appellants were Gorawaras wife and daughter; neither are employed, and the first appellant, wife (hereafter Madhu) is suffering from various chronic ailments. The present proceedings were preceded by a series of litigation between the appellants and second respondent. One of these resulted in applications of maintenance under Section 125 of the Co...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »