Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harjit Singh (Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs vs.surender Singh & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.24/2018 + % HARJIT SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS Reserved on:10. h January, 2018 Pronounced on :18. h January, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Advocate Jain, and Mr. Ayush with Ms. Akanksha Advocate Agarwal, Advocate. versus SURENDER SINGH & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. No.924/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.24/2018 2. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellants, the legal heirs of the original plaintiff Sh. Harjit Singh and who were RFA No.24/2018 Page 1 of 15 substituted legal heirs of the plaintiff Sh. Harjit Singh during the pendency of the suit, impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 12.9.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appella...
Pappu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~4, 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 360/2002 + CHHATAR PAL Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocate. ..... Appellant STATE PAPPU STATE versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent and CRL.A. 721/2002 Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER1801.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar,J.:1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 5th February 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.220/1999 arising out of FIR No.104/1999 convicting Crl.A. 360/2002 & 721/2002 Page 1 of 14 the two Appellants, Chhatar Pal (A-1) and Pappu (A-2), under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 6th February 2002 whereby for the aforementioned offences each of them was sentenced to imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and, in default of payment of s...
M. B. Usgaonkar vs.uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~R4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P. (C) 576/2005 M. B. USGAONKAR Decided on 18.01.2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Adv. versus UOI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition assails an order dated 02.09.2004 rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as CAT), in OA No.2089/2003, titled as M. B. Usgaonkar vs. UOI & Ors., dismissing the same on the ground that the petitioner ought to have raised the pleas raised in the present proceedings, in the earlier round of proceedings instituted on his behalf.2. Upon a reading of the said impugned order dated 02.09.2004, it appears that the CAT was impressed by the submissions made on behalf of the Union of India that the application was barred by the principle of constructive res judicata because t...
Poonam Pandey (Now Deceased) Thr Legal Heirs & Anr. Vs.poorna Nand Baj ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on :-"18th January, 2018 CM (M) 27/2015 and CM APPL.1765/2016, 1390-1393/2018 POONAM PANDEY (NOW DECEASED) THR LEGAL HEIRS & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Nitin Dahiya Advocate with Mr. Prateek Dahiya, Adv. versus POORNA NAND BAJPEI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. F.S.Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1(a) to 1(c). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This mater has brought to light utter neglect and complete mishandling almost by all concerned with the proceedings arising out of the civil suit, the details of which are mentioned herein below.2. Civil suit (suit No.321/2014) was instituted by Poonam Pandey (wife of Om Babu Pandey) and Rama Nand Bajpai joining as first and second plaintiffs in 1993, seeking reliefs in the nature of partition, CM(M) 27/2015 Page 1 of 8 separate possession, etc. The respondents herein were impleaded as defendants. The suit had reached advanced stag...
mohd.umar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JANUARY18 2018 + Crl.Rev.P.823/2017 and Crl.M.B.1916/2017 MOHD.UMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate. versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. ASI Rajesh Kumar, PS Kashmiri Gate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 23.09.2017 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Crl.A.No.199/2017 whereby the findings of the Trial Court on conviction in case FIR No.under SectionIPC registered at Police Station Kashmere Gate (Metro) by a judgment dated 09.08.2017 were confirmed. The revision petition is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. Crl.Rev.P.823/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. On perusal of the file it reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 379 IPC by an order dated...
Jitender Singh and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 18, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10119/2017 JITENDER SINGH AND ORS. Through: Ms. Janani, Advocate ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) C.M.1647/2018 (delay) There is delay of 7 days in filing the accompanying counter affidavit. Upon hearing, I find that averments made in the instant application provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay stands condoned and the counter affidavit is taken on record. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 10119/2017 & CM413372017 (stay)... Petitioners are ancillary workers, who in this writ petition seek a mandamus to respondent-FCI to fill up the vacancies of Watchmen in the Delhi Region of respondent-FCI from the ancillary workers/staff. W.P.(C) 10119/2017 Page 1 of 3 Quashing of Advertisement of 14th Octob...
B K Basavaraju vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~9 * + W.P.(C) 6982/2017 & CM No.28975/2017 (stay) B K BASAVARAJU Through: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Adv. for UOI/R-1 Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2 to R-4 ORDER1801.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 15.03.2017, passed by % 1. the Central Administrative Tribunal, dismissing a Miscellaneous Application (M.A. No.2514/2014) filed by him for impleadment in an Original Application (OA No.728/2013), filed by Ms.Kiran, the respondent No.4 herein.2. By the impugned order, the Tribunal dismissed the impleadment application filed by the petitioner and contemporaneously, allowed the OA of the respondent No.4 by quashing and setting aside an order dated 22.02.2013, passed by the respondent No.3/CCIM, reverting her from the post of Office Superintendent to Junior Stenograph...
M/S Ccc Builders Merchant Private Limited vs.container Corporation of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:09. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:18. h January, 2018 + ARB.P. 747/2017, IA No.287/2018 M/S CCC BUILDERS MERCHANT PRIVATE LIMITED Through : Ms.Manmeet Ms.Samapiha Mr.Keshav Sehgal, Advocates. Arora Biswal ........ Petitioner and and versus CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Mr.D.D.Singh and Ms.Seeratdeep Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The brief facts as alleged by the petitioner are: a) The respondent awarded the LOI dated 09.09.2009 in favour of the petitioner for civil works of "strengthening of existing pavement with M-50 Grade CC Block Pavement at ICD, Balasore, (Orissa)"; b) the petitioner company submitted performance bank guarantees dated 15.09.2009 for a sum of Rs. 11,07,398/- and 08.10.2009 for a sum of Rs. 2,56,000/- respectively, issued by Axis Bank Limited, amounting to 5% of the ARB.P.747/2017 Page 1 of 13 contract value, equivalent to a...
Airport Authority of India vs.v. Vardharajan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~33 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:18. 01.2018 W.P. (C) 2620/2008 AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate. versus V. VARDHARAJAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Atul T.N., Advocate for R-1 to R-3. None for R-4 & R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CM No.2705/2010 (filed by R-1 U/s.17-B of ID Act) CM No.2682/2010 (filed by R-2 U/s.17-B of ID Act) CM No.2704/2010 (filed by R-3 U/s.17-B of ID Act) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner feeling aggrieved by the impugned Award dated 05.10.2007 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, New Delhi (in short Industrial Adjudicator) in ID No.104/2000, in case titled as V. Varadha Rajan & 4 others Vs. The Airport Director, Airport Authority of India, by which the petitioner herein was directed to reinstate the workmen/respondents herein w.e.f. 06.12.1996...
Habitat India vs.m/s G R Gupta Brothers Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-18-2018
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h January, 2018 RFA5832016 HABITAT INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mrs. Biji Rajesh, Advocate for Mr. Advocate. Kanth, Gaurang (M:9717577733) versus M/S G R GUPTA BROTHERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate. (M:9810566116) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh. J.(Oral) The present appeal impugns judgment/order dated 19th January, 2016.1. By the impugned judgment, the Trial court decreed the suit filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) in its favour for a sum of Rs.8,17,771/- along with the pendent lite and future interest @ 18% per annum from date of filing till realisation. The Appellant/Defendant 2. impugned order on the following grounds: (hereinafter,Defendant) challenges the (a) the evidence of the Defendant has been completely ignored on the ground that board resolution in favour of DW-1, Mr. Anil Mahindra was not produced. (b) the certificate issued by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »