Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jamil @ Jamir vs.state (Govt Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~ * + + + Versus Crl.As.1226/2013, 1383/2013, 1460/2013 & 1581/2013 Page 1 of 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1226/2013 Reserved on:3. d January, 2018 Decided on:19. h January, 2018 JAMIL @ JAMIR Through: Mr.Kanhaiya (DHCLSC). ..... Appellant Singhal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 1383/2013 IRSHAD @ PUCHI Through: Ms.Inderjeet (DHCLSC). Versus ..... Appellant Advocate Sidhu, STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. ..... Respondent NASIR CRL.A. 1460/2013 Through: Mr.Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. + YASIN CRL.A. 1581/2013 Through: Mr.Aditya (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate. Vikram, ..... Appellant Advocate STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These 4 a...
Yasin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~ * + + + Versus Crl.As.1226/2013, 1383/2013, 1460/2013 & 1581/2013 Page 1 of 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1226/2013 Reserved on:3. d January, 2018 Decided on:19. h January, 2018 JAMIL @ JAMIR Through: Mr.Kanhaiya (DHCLSC). ..... Appellant Singhal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 1383/2013 IRSHAD @ PUCHI Through: Ms.Inderjeet (DHCLSC). Versus ..... Appellant Advocate Sidhu, STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. ..... Respondent NASIR CRL.A. 1460/2013 Through: Mr.Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. + YASIN CRL.A. 1581/2013 Through: Mr.Aditya (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate. Vikram, ..... Appellant Advocate STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These 4 a...
Prabhu Dayal Public School and Anr. Vs.anita Bharadwaj & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
* 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 19, 2018 + W.P.(C) 949/2017 & C.M. 4327/2017 (i) (ii) + W.P.(C) 3808/2017 & C.M. 16719/2017 (iii) + W.P.(C) 3850/2017 & C.M. 16889/2017 PRABHU DAYAL PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. ...... Petitioners Through: Mr. K.P. Sundar Rao, Ms.Seema Meena & Ms. R. Gayathri Manasa, Advocates Versus (i) N R VERMA AND ANR. (ii) ANITA BHARADWAJ & ANR. (iii) MS DEV BALA THROUGH HER LRS JAGAT BANDHU AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal & Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL In the above captioned three petitions, challenge is to order of 5th October, 2016 (Annexure-A) of Delhi School Tribunal (henceforth referred to as the Tribunal) vide which penalty of removal from service has been set aside with direction to reinstate respondents- teachers/ Laboratory Assistant. Counsel representing both the sides s...
Roopak Malik & Anr vs.daryao Singh Dahiya & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~OS-5 * % + CS(COMM) 86/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 01.2018 ROOPAK MALIK & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Mann Seshadri, Adv. versus DARYAO SINGH DAHIYA & ORS. ..... Defendant Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed seeking various reliefs. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs submits that the plaintiffs confines the relief as stated in para 16(b), namely, a decree in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants jointly and severally for a sum of Rs.4.2 crores with interest at 18% per annum.2. The case of the plaintiffs is that the plaintiffs are exclusive owners of Flat No.HI A021, Second Floor, Block-A, having a super built up area of 263.95 sq.mt. along with covered/open parking space located at Westend Heights, Phase-V, DLF City, Gurgaon, Haryana(herein referred as the said property). A conveyance deed was executed by the original owners M/s. Nilgiri Cultivators Private Limite...
Irshad @ Puchi vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~ * + + + Versus Crl.As.1226/2013, 1383/2013, 1460/2013 & 1581/2013 Page 1 of 30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1226/2013 Reserved on:3. d January, 2018 Decided on:19. h January, 2018 JAMIL @ JAMIR Through: Mr.Kanhaiya (DHCLSC). ..... Appellant Singhal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 1383/2013 IRSHAD @ PUCHI Through: Ms.Inderjeet (DHCLSC). Versus ..... Appellant Advocate Sidhu, STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. ..... Respondent NASIR CRL.A. 1460/2013 Through: Mr.Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. + YASIN CRL.A. 1581/2013 Through: Mr.Aditya (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate. Vikram, ..... Appellant Advocate STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These 4 a...
Ashok Kumar Sawhney vs.central Bank of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 549/2018 Date of Decision: January 19, 2018 1. ASHOK KUMAR SAWHNEY Through: Mr. Umesh Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.S. Mathur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL Vide order of 15th December, 2003, petitioner, who was Chief General Manager, Zonal Office, New Delhi of respondent-Bank was compulsory retired consequent upon a departmental inquiry against him.... Petitioner claims that he had made various Representations to the authorities concerned from the year 2004 till 2006 to seek release of pension and leave encashment but to no avail.... Petitioner claims that after deducting of the pension, remaining 2/3rd was released to him in December, 2006.2. It is the case of petitioner that his wife had suffered heart attack in the year 2006 and was bed ridden and she needed constant assistance and due to prolonged heart ailment, she died...
Deepak @ Peta vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : January 19th, 2018 CRL.A. 695/2017 DEEPAK @ PETA ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Aishwarya Rao, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S. TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the convict/ appellant (hereinafter referred to as the appellant), namely, Deepak @ Peta under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 27.01.2010 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 IPC, and against the order on sentence dated 03.02.2010 whereby the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment along with fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo one year simple imprisonment. Crl.A.695/2017 Page 1of 34 2. Factual matrix, emerging from the record, is that on 25.06.2007 at about 23.33 hours, an information was received by the police with regard ...
M/S Amrit Lal Bajaj & Co & Anr vs.m/s Vysya Leasing and Finance Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~37, 38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:19. h January, 2018 + FAO (OS) (COMM) 9/2018 M/S AMRIT LAL BAJAJ & CO & ANR ..... Appellants Through Ms. Urvashi Singh and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocates + versus M/ VYSYA LEASING AND FINANCE LTD Through Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate ..... Respondent FAO(OS) (COMM) 10/2018 M/S AMRIT LAL BAJAJ & CO & ANR ..... Appellants Through Ms. Urvashi Singh and Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocates versus M/S VYSYA LEASING AND FINANCE LTD Through Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL23792018(Exemption) in FAO(OS) (COMM) 9/2018 CM.APPL23802018(Exemption) in FAO(OS) (COMM) 10/2018 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. FAO(OS)(C OMM).Nos.9/2018 & 10/2018 Page 1 of 13 FAO(OS) (COMM) 9/2018 FAO(OS) (COMM)10/2018 3. Both the appeals arise out of a common order passed by the learned...
Crayons Advertising Private Limited vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:11. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:19. h January, 2018 CRAYONS ADVERTISING PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent versus + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 71/2017, IA No.10366/2017 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 79/2017, IA No.11697/2017 CONCEPT COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ........ Petitioner BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent versus Appearance : Mr.Jayant Mehta, Mr.Aman Varma, Ms.Ansula and Grover, Mr.Parth Singh Chandhari Mr.Shaurya Kuthila, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr.L.B.Rai, Mr.Sumit Nagpal and Mr.Mohit Kr. Sharma, Advocates for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 71/2017 1. The petitioner has filed this petition (O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) No.71/2017) under Section 15 (2) of the Arbitration and O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) Nos.71 & 79 of 2017 Page 1 of 8 Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) for declarating the mandate of the sole arbi...
State vs.subash Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d December, 2017 Pronounced on:19. h January, 2018 CRL.A. 247/2000 SUBASH GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Vikram Panwar, Mr Vikas Walia and Mr. Sumit Misra, Advocates STATE STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham and Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. Ms Gitanjali Malviya and Ms Sana-Ul-Haq and Mr Purushendra Bhardwaj, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 6, 7 & 9 And CRL.A. 81/2003 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Anita Abraham and Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State versus ........ RESPONDENTS SUBASH GUPTA & ORS. Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Vikram Panwar, Mr Vikas Walia and Mr Sumit Misra, Advocates for R-1 Mr Ravinder Tyagi, Ms Kanishka Tyagi, Ms Kartika Tyagi and Ms Divya Singhal, Advocates Crl.A.247/2000 & Crl.A.81/2003 Page 1 of 55 for Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 Ms Gitanjali Malviya and Ms Sana-Ul-Haq and Mr.Purushendra Bhardwaj, Advocates for... RESPONDEN...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »