Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar & Anr. Vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:22. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9989/2015 ASHOK KUMAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha, Mr.V.K.Shailendra and Ms.Worthing Kasar, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing counsel ........ RESPONDENTS with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi and Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advts. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra no.1145 measuring 02 bighas 02 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of t...
Balraj Tahim & Anr vs.kaushalya Tahim & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~OS-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:22. 01.2018 + CS(OS) 980/2013 & I.A.No.8648/2017 BALRAJ TAHIM & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Pratyush Srivastava, Advs. versus KAUSHALYA TAHIM & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Kunal Madan, Adv. for Mr.Shekhar Dassi, Adv. for D-4a, 4b and 4c. Mr.J.S.Vohra, Adv. for D2 &D3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) I.A.No.8648/2017 1. This application is filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC seeking to amend the plaint.2. In this case the issues have been framed on 29.04.2016. However, the plaintiffs have yet to lead evidence.3. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking preliminary decree of partition in favour of plaintiffs No.1 and 2 and against the defendants to declare that plaintiffs No.1 and 2 are entitled to receive 1/6th share in all the immovable properties as mentioned in para 2 of the plaint and in schedule 'A' attached to the plaint. Other connected relief...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited vs.samsung C & T Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.68/2018 + % BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azmat H. Amanullah and Mr. 22nd January, 2018 Ankit Chaturvedi, Advocates. versus SAMSUNG C & T PVT. LTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.2709/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.2708/2018 (seeking extension of time to file court- fees) As prayed on behalf of the appellant, the appellant will ensure that court-fee in this appeal is positively deposited within three weeks and in this regard counsel for the appellant will give a personal RFA No.68/2018 Page 1 of 10 undertaking to ensure that the court-fee will be deposited as required in this appeal. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.68/2018 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...
Nathi Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11183/2015 Date of Judgment :22nd January, 2018 NATHI SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Arun Kumar Kaushik, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: Through Mr.Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr.Santosh Prasad Chaurasiya, G.P. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Mr.Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to share in Khasra nos.26(0-13), 266/2(1-6), 30(1-7) total measuring 3 bighas 6 biswas, share in Khasra nos.274(5- 3), 254(1-5), 257(0-19), 258(4-2), 226(7-3), 292 (9-2), 227 (0-8) total measuring 28 bighas 2 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of village Khizrabad, Tehsil Mehrauli, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as th...
Virender Kumar Awasthi vs.mahender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"22nd January, 2018 + C.R.P. 247/2017 and CM APPL.42242/2017, 44475/2017 VIRENDER KUMAR AWASTHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi P. Shukla, Ms. Upasana Shukla and Mr. Prashant Saini, Advocates versus MAHENDER KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The civil suit (CS No.345/2016) in which the impugned order dated 06.10.2017 was passed by the Additional District Judge (ADJ) was instituted by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioner (defendant) seeking recovery of Rs.6,00,000/-, the suit having been presented as a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) founded on the agreement to sale and purchase dated 26.08.2016. The subject matter of the suit is immoveable property described as residential plot bearing No.RZF- 757/28, area measuring 100 sq. yds., which is part of Khasra No.47/20, situated in Rajnagar-II...
Paras White Gold Agro Industries vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision: January 22, 2018 W.P.(C) 10534/2016 PARAS WHITE GOLD AGRO INDUSTRIES Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narang, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. with Ms. Eshita Baruah, Adv. for SDMC Ms. Niti Jain, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: It is therefore most respectfully prayed, that this Honble Court may be pleased to: (I) Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of mandamus directing the... RESPONDENTS to implement the notification dated 20/10/2015 in letter and spirits and not to charge ECC on vehicles entering Delhi carrying edible oil (an essential commodity) in compliance of order of Honble Supreme Court dated 9/10/2015 to such effect; AND (II) Pass such other order (s) as deemed fit by this Honble High Court in the...
Ferrero Spa & Anr vs.piyush Devangan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~OS-3 * % + CS(OS) 872/2014 FERRERO SPA & ANR Date of Decision:22. 01.2018 ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Mr.Siddhant Chamola & Ms.Saugaat Khurana, Advs. versus PIYUSH DEVANGAN & ANR Through ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This suit is filed seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants etc. from dealing in any manner with the confectionery products which are look a likes of the plaintiffs FERRERO ROCHER chocolate specialties sold under the mark/name 'D-Lizie' and/or any other goods under the trade dress as stated in paragraph 13 of the plaint. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the plaintiffs chocolates are sold under the trade mark FERRERO ROCHER at worldwide level and are amongst the best known confectionery products in the world. The annual sales turnover of FERRERO ROCHER is said to be nearly one billion- US Dol...
Batra Hospital Employees Union vs.batra Hospital & Medical Research
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 11th, 2018 Pronounced on:22. d January, 2018 + W.P (C) No.5349/2004 BATRA HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES UNION ...Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Ms. Urvi Mohan and Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Advs. Versus BATRA HOSPITAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Sharma with Mr. Ninad Dogra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % 1. The Batra Hospital Employees Union claims, in this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, to be aggrieved by an Award, dated 03rd November 2003, passed by the Industrial Tribunal-I, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), which holds that the provisions of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 do not apply to the Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre.2. The Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre (hereinafter referred to as the respondent-Hospital) was, admittedly, managed and run by the Ch. Aishi Ram Batra Charitable Trust (he...
Smt. Ravneet Kaur vs.shri Prithpal Singh Dhingra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~55 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"22nd January, 2018 + C.M. (M) 92/2018 and CM APPL.2572-2573/2018 SMT. RAVNEET KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mrs. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Adv. versus SHRI PRITHPAL SINGH DHINGRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr. Ravitnay Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition assails the order dated 21.08.2017 of the trial court declining liberty to amend the pleadings in the civil suit.2. The petitioner is the defendant in the civil suit (Civ DJ- 613347/2016) which was instituted on 20.08.2016 by the respondent herein seeking reliefs in the nature of decree of eviction, possession, recovery of damages and permanent injunction against her in respect of premises described as front side of the second floor of property bearing No.E-7, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi-110027 (the suit property). It is an admitted case of both the parties that the pet...
Dharmendra Singh Rana and Ors. Vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 12.2017 Pronounced on:22. 01.2018 + W.P.(C) 4410/2015 DHARMENDRA SINGH RANA AND ORS. .... Petitioners versus THE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Abhishek Choudhary, Advocates, for petitioners. Sh. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Sh. R.A. Iyer, Advocate, for GNCTD. Sh. Sanjoy Ghose with Ms. Urvi Mohan and Sh. Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates, for DHC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The writ petitioners seek directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, that their pay and allowances should be fixed at the appropriate grade and stage, by the respondent authorities (i.e. the High Court establishment) by taking into account their previous service in the defence forces (Army or Indian Air Force, hereafter collectively called the Forces). They complain of illegality in the matter of pay ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »