Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences vs.sakshi Mathur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9087/2015 & CM No.20571/2015 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Through: Mr Aldanish Rein, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus SAKSHI MATHUR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2301.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 20.07.2015 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter the CIC) directing the petitioner to provide question papers along with relevant answer key for the AIIMS- MBBS Entrance Examination, 2013.2. The respondent is a candidate who had appeared in AIIMS-MBBS Entrance Examination, 2013 held on 01.06.2013 and had filed an application dated 03.07.2013 under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act) seeking the following information:-"Required information 1. Certified copy of Question booklet of AIIMS-MBBS Entrance Examination, 2013 of Roll No.3214065. W.P.(C)...
Amina Bharatram vs.sumant Bharatram & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d January, 2018. CS(OS) 411/2010 AMINA BHARATRAM ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Malvika Rajkotia and Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advs. SUMANT BHARATRAM & ORS Versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg and Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Advs. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for maintenance and separate residence under Sections 18, 20 & 23 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 and for permanent and mandatory injunction and declaration claiming the following reliefs: a) a decree of maintenance be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants, awarding Rs.2.5 lakhs per month and appropriate orders be passed, securing the payment of the maintenance amount against/from the assets of the defendants. b) Pass a decree of mandatory injunction against the defendants to continuing to pay the rent for the matrimonial home or in the alternative a decree be passed...
Ram Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:22. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 396/2016 RAM SINGH & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sukhbir Sejwal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr.Hem Kumar and Ms.Simmee Kumari, Advts. for the DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra no.280 measuring 01 bigha 05 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Lado Sarai, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitati...
S. Daya Singh & Sons Huf vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:22. d January, 2018 S. DAYA SINGH & SONS HUF Through: Mr.Riju Raj Jamwal, Advocate ........ Petitioners + W.P.(C) 467/2015 versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, standing counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, adv. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi and Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in Khasra No.43(0-5), 43(0-10), 443 (4-16), 444 (4- 16), 445 (3-10), 446 (3-0), 447 (1-4), 451 (1-11) and 452 (3-2) measuring 22 bighas 14 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Shayoorpur, Tehsil Hauz Khas, Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject l...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.hargyan Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~48 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"22nd January, 2018 + MAC.APP. 158/2017 & CM No.6524/2017 (stay) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Amit Gaur, Advs. versus HARGYAN SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma & Mr. K.C. Dixit, Advs. for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Sunil, aged 19 years, died in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 20.11.2011, due to negligent driving of Indica Car bearing registration No.UP16AT3669 admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (insurer). On accident claim case (suit No.43/2015), instituted on 17.05.2012, by his parents, i.e. first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), in the wake of detailed accident report (DAR) submitted by the police on the basis of evidence gathered during investigation into corresponding first information report (FIR No.575/2011), of police station Lin...
Anita Chopra Hasanwalia vs.sunita Chopra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.42/2018 & CM Nos. 1612-13/2018 + % ANITA CHOPRA HASANWALIA Through: Reserved on:19. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:22. d January, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Robin Kamra and Mr. Paras Masija, Advocates. versus SUNITA CHOPRA & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 (i) This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.2 in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 17.11.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for partition etc with respect to the property J- 5/71, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi. (ii) The subject suit was filed by the three respondents/plaintiffs. Respondent nos. 2 and 3/plaintiff nos. 2 and 3 in the suit were the RFA No.42/2018 Page 1 of 9 minor children of late Sh. Tarun Chopra, the son of late defendant no.1/Smt. Sus...
Sunanda Devi Saraf vs.delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~44 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:22. d January, 2018 Through: Mr. M. P. Bhargava, Advocate. ........ Petitioner SUNANDA DEVI SARAF + W.P.(C) 8140/2017 versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPLN. No.33485/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W. P. (C) 8140/2017 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner.2. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner i.e. 4 Bighas and 16 Biswas comprised in Khasra No.1548, situated in the revenue estate of village Chattarpur, Tehsil Hauz Khas, New Delhi (hereinafter ...
Shri Rajiv Katyal vs.shri Arun Kumar Paswan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 596/2014 Decided on:-"22nd January, 2018 SHRI RAJIV KATYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhash Chand, Advocate versus SHRI ARUN KUMAR PASWAN ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The eviction case (E-08/2011) was instituted by the petitioner (indisputably the landlord) on 21.04.2011 seeking order of eviction against the respondent herein (concededly the tenant) on the ground of non-payment of rent invoking Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in respect of premises described as ground floor of property No.D-217, Ganesh Nagar, Pandav Nagar Complex, Delhi- 110092, inter alia, on the ground that the tenant had neither paid nor tendered the arrears of rent at the rate of Rs.2400/- per month w.e.f November, 2005 in spite of notice of demand dated 07.10.2010 (Ex.PW-1/J) within a period of two months from the date of its receipt. It appears that in the pleadings the landlord...
Sunita Gangwal vs.chottey Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SUNITA GANGWAL RFA No.1059/2017 Reserved on:15. h January, 2018 Pronounced on:22. d January, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Kadambari Puri, Ms.Sarika, Mr. Lokesh Malik, Advocates. CHOTTEY LAL versus Through: Ms.Gita Dhingra, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 13.02.2015 whereby trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff filed seeking possession of the suit property being the entire ground floor of House No.I-2/182/183, Madangir, New Delhi as shown in red and green colour in the site plan Ex.PW1/6. Damages/mesne profits were also RFA No.1059/2017 Page 1 of 26 granted at Rs.2,000/- per month pendente lite and future till handing over possession of the suit prop...
Dimple Gaur & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-22-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:22. d January, 2018 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Aditya Singh, advocate DIMPLE GAUR & ANR. + W.P.(C) 766/2015 versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, standing counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, adv. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi and Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in Khasra No.25(6-11), 3(0-11), 511 (0-13), 823 (4-16), 82(5-1), 1229 (4-9), 127(3-7) and 1278 (4-6) total measuring 29 bighas 14 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »