Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pima Lal vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10405/2015 PIMA LAL Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha and Ms. ........ Petitioner versus Megha Katari, Advocates GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the LAC, copy supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. Counter affidavit be taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings...
Rishi Pal Singh Verma vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 485/2016 RISHI PAL SINGH VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Maan, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akhil Mittal, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Anirudha Deshmukh, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL343872017(delay) 1. This is an application filed by the applicant/LAC seeking condonation of 138 days delay in filing the counter affidavit. Notice. Counsel for the non-applicants accepts notice. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 138 days in filing the 2.3. counter affidavit is condoned.4. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 485/2016 5. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal. W.P. (C) No.485/2016 Page 1 of 7 6. This is a petition under Article 226 of the...
Simrin Singh vs.amrit Srinivasan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d January, 2018. SIMRIN SINGH CS(OS) 2258/2010 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhijat, Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Ms. Dakshaa Arora and Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. versus AMRIT SRINIVASAN & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhey Narula, Adv. for D-1&2. Mr. K.R. Chawla, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The suit is listed before this Court in terms of order dated 6th January, 2018 of the Joint Registrar.2. Though commission for recording of evidence has been issued in this suit, stated to be consolidated with some other proceedings, but the cross- examination of PW-3, being a witness to a document claimed to be a Will, was ordered to be recorded before the Joint Registrar.3. Cross-examination has been completed. The counsel for the plaintiff however sought to re-examine PW-3 and which was objected to by the senior counsel for the defendants no.1&2. Hence the Registrar ha...
S P Gupta vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2018 + CRL.M.C. 2345/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.8181/2015 & 11749/2015 + VIPUL GUPTA Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gurpreet Singh and Mr. Jatin S. Sethi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Rajbir Singh Gulia, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Raghvendra Mishra & Ms. Vedika Mittal, Advocates for respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 2365/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.8240/2015 & 11755/2015 S P GUPTA Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal & Mr. Gurpreet ........ Petitioner versus Singh, Advocates. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 2345/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 24 + + Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Rajbir Singh Gulia, Mr. Asho...
Bhuvnesh Kumari vs.government of n.c.t. Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 187/2018 and CM APPL. 771/2018 Reserved on:09. 01.2018 Date of decision:23. 01.2018 IN THE MATTER OF: BHUVNESH KUMARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. DELHI AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. N.A. Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The petitioner, who was a PGT and had retired on the post of Vice- Principal in the Govt. Girls Senior Secondary School, Sonia Vihar, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the school) run by the Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, assails an order dated 12.5.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, dismissing O.A. No.1915/ 2014 filed by her for quashing the Memorandum dated 10.9.2008, calling upon her to explain her absence from duty from 02.9.2008 to 05.9.2008, without prior approval of the competent authority, order dated 09.1.2013 passed by the Chief...
Bharat Singh & Ors. Vs.land Acquisition Collector East & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7622/2015 BHARAT SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Anuroop P.S., Advocate versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR EAST & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Ms. Takiar, counsel for the DDA submits that she has received the counter affidavit, a copy of which has been examined by the Court. Let the counter affidavit be filed in the Registry and placed on record.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra nos.min (1-6), 2min(1-10), 25(2-4), 26/1(2-4), 27/1(0-7), 28/2(3-3), 351/1(0-4), 352/...
Abhishek Verma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: January 23, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5341/2017 & C.M. 22607/2017 1. ABHISHEK VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ujala Vishnoi & Mr. Randeep Singh, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Arunav Patnaik and Ms. Mahima Sinha, Advocates for respondent No.3 Mr. A.K. Rasgopal, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL... Petitioner had applied for the post of Public Relation Officer (PRO) on 25th February, 2017 while claiming to be a graduate with Masters in Business Administration in Marketing with specialization in Advertisement.... Petitioner had appeared in the interview for the post of PRO on 5th June, 2017 and thereafter, the merit list was displayed on 8th June, 2017, in which name of petitioner was at serial No.2.2. Learned counsel for contesting respondent has drawn the attention of this court to Annexure R-1...
Munni vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~5 to 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1055/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2046/2017 RAJU STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri * 5+ 6+ CRL.A. 1056/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2047/2017 PRASHANT ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri ..... Respondent 7+ CRL.A. 1079/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2089/2017 MUNNI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate versus CRL.A. 1055/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 STATE Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri 8 + CRL.A. 1121/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2169/2017 SURESH @ BANTI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.K.Parameshwar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru...
Zenner International Gmbh & Co Kg and Anr vs.anand Zenner Company Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d January, 2018 CS(COMM) 156/2017& IA No.10131/2012 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC). ZENNER INTERNATIONAL GMBH & CO KG AND ANR Through: Mr. Arjun Singh, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs ANAND ZENNER COMPANY PVT LTD ..... Defendant versus Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sujoy Kumar and Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.1078/2018 (of the defendant under Order VII Rule 10 CPC).1. The defendant, in this suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of the trade mark and passing off and for ancillary reliefs, after the issues were framed in this suit on 23rd February, 2017 including an issue as to the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, seeks return of the plaint under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).2. The counsel for the plaintiffs appearing on advance notice seeks adjournment to file reply.3. An application under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC...
Dewan Chand Pruthi vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment :23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 609/2016 DEWAN CHAND PRUTHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sameet Vashist, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings are liable to lapse with respect to the land bearing Khasra No.1566 admeasuring 4 Bigha and 16 Biswas situated in the revenue estate of Village Chattarpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Subject Land), in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act), as neither the...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »