Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjeev Kumar vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2018 CRL.M.C. 5313/2017 SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. JUDGMENT2301.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 20836/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5313/2017 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 13.07.2017, passed by the Revisional Court, dismissing the revision petition filed by the petitioner against order dated 22.03.2017, passed by the Trial Court, dismissing the complaint of the petitioner after recording pre- summoning evidence. CRL.M.C. 5313/2017 Page 1 of 7 2. The allegation of the petitioner was that on 07.03.2010 at about 12:15 pm his wife had gone to take a bath and on return after 10 to 15 minutes, she found that the ...
Manoj Kumar vs.state ( Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:16. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2018 CRL. Appeal 965/2017 MANOJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Manish Kumar, Mr Ravindra Samueal and Ms Sanjeeta Tripathi, Advs STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms Neelam Sharma, APP with SI R.S. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.Pandit 1 Appellant Manoj Kumar has filed the present appeal. He had appeared on the production warrant. He is a convict along with co-accused Satish Kumar. Both the appellants have been convicted under Section 392 r/w 120B IPC. Appellant Manoj Kumar was separately convicted under Section 397 IPC as well. The appellant had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years as also to pay a fine of Rs 5000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of three months. As on 20.11.2017 the appellant has undergone incarceration of 1 year and 13 days meaning thereby that as on da...
Satya Narain Gupta vs.government of National Capital Territory of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~22 * % + W.P.(C) 10440/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:23. d January, 2018 SATYA NARAIN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha and Ms. Megha Katari, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi and Ms. Kajri Gupta, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the LAC. Copy has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. Let the counter affidavit be taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration tha...
M/S Mont Blanc Simplo Gmbh vs.gaurav Bhatia and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~60 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 46/2018 M/S MONT BLANC SIMPLO GMBH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. V.P. Singh, Mr. Aditya Jalan, Mr. Pradyumna Sharma and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advs. versus GAURAV BHATIA AND ORS Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO % ORDER2301.2018 CM. No.2848/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 46/2018, CM Nos. 2845/2018 (for impleadment) & 2846/2018 (for stay) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 violating the judgment dated January 4, 2017 in Civil Suit being CS(OS) 2563/2013.2. An issue has been raised by the Court on the maintainability of the Contempt petition in view of remedy of Execution available to the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the petitioner would state, the petitioner has also ...
Suresh @ Banti vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~5 to 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1055/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2046/2017 RAJU STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri * 5+ 6+ CRL.A. 1056/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2047/2017 PRASHANT ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri ..... Respondent 7+ CRL.A. 1079/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2089/2017 MUNNI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate versus CRL.A. 1055/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 STATE Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri 8 + CRL.A. 1121/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2169/2017 SURESH @ BANTI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.K.Parameshwar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru...
Shri Om Parkash Spall vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 587/2016 SHRI OM PARKASH SPALL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rout and Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the LAC. Copy has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. Let the counter affidavit be taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner comprised in W.P. (C) No.587/201...
Pooja Pahwa vs.mahinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d January, 2018 C.R.P. 14/2018 & CM Nos. 2598-99/2018 POOJA PAHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav & Ms. Preeti Singh, Advs. versus MAHINDER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) The impugned order was passed on 01.12.2017 by the trial 1. Judge on the file of the summary suit (CS No.453/17) instituted by the respondent (the plaintiff) against the petitioner (the defendant) under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) founded primarily on a document styled as a promissory note and receipt (copy at page 36 of the paper book), dated 06.04.2016. The defendant (i.e. the petitioner) had moved an application seeking leave to defend which was considered by the trial judge through the impugned order. Though leave to defend has been granted, the defendant has been called upon to deposit in the Court an amount of Rs.5.50 lakhs as mentioned in the above-...
Santosh Devi and Ors vs.the State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d January, 2018 $~25 * % + W.P.(C) 8650/2016 SANTOSH DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Ojha and Mr. Neeraj Thakkar, Advocates versus THE STATE AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Parth Vashishtha proxy for Mr. S.K. Tripathi, ASC for GNCTD Mr. K.R. Verma and Mr. Amit Chandel, Advocates for respondent No.2 Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 16th May, 2016 whereby the Claims Tribunal has dismissed their application for compensation.2. The petitioners filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation claiming compensation in respect of the death of late Rajinder Kumar on 07th November, 2014. The case of the petitioners before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation was W.P.(C) 8650/2016 Page 1 of 6 that Rajinder Kumar was working as a driver with responde...
Vipul Gupta vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2018 + CRL.M.C. 2345/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.8181/2015 & 11749/2015 + VIPUL GUPTA Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gurpreet Singh and Mr. Jatin S. Sethi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Rajbir Singh Gulia, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Raghvendra Mishra & Ms. Vedika Mittal, Advocates for respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 2365/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.8240/2015 & 11755/2015 S P GUPTA Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal & Mr. Gurpreet ........ Petitioner versus Singh, Advocates. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 2345/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 24 + + Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Rajbir Singh Gulia, Mr. Asho...
Pushkar vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :23. d JANUARY, 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 37/2018 PUSHKAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vipin, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP. Mr.Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. CRL.REV.P. 38/2018 PUSHKAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vipin, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Mr.Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) Crl.Rev.372018 & connected matter Page 1 of 4 CRL.M.A.No.1389/2018 in CRL.REV.P. 37/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.1386/2018 in CRL.REV.P. 38/2018 1. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the files are taken up today for consideration.2. The applications stand disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 37/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.682/2018 & CRL.REV.P. 38/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.693/2018 1. Crl.Rev.P.37/2018 has been prefe...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »