Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Airlines Limited vs.skyline Nepc Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % INDIAN AIRLINES LIMITED CS(COMM) No.402/2016 31st January, 2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Suruchi Suri, Advocate. versus SKYLINE NEPC LIMITED & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Danish Aftab Chowdhury Sharma, Suvir and Mr. Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff/Indian Airlines Ltd. has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.1,24,51,412.50 against two defendants. The first defendant is Skyline NEPC Ltd. and the second defendant is NEPC India Ltd. Plaint is a joinder of two causes of action with one cause of action against the defendant no.1 towards charges claimed by the plaintiff for providing to the defendant no.1 maintenance, repairs etc with respect to aircrafts of the defendant no.1. The second cause of action against the defendant no.2 is on account of plaintiff providing CS(COMM) No.402/2016 Page 1 of 10 ground handling services...
Sarfraz Ahmad vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~23 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:31. t January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1880/2017 SARFRAZ AHMAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Department with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondent/LAC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to petitioners land property no.H-2A comprised in Khasra No.409 admeasuring 502 square yards (10 biswa), situated in the revenue estate of Abul Fazal Enclave Part-II, Village Jasola, New Delhi-110025 (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) o...
Surender Kumar vs.delhi Development Authority & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t January, 2018 + CM(M) 125/2018 and CM38183819/2018 SURENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Singh, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had instituted civil suit (now registered as suit no.12617/2016) on 10.11.2006 initially against Delhi Development Authority (DDA), the first respondent herein, seeking reliefs in the nature of declaration to the effect that he is the sole owner of the subject property and for mandatory injunction against DDA for mutation of the subject property in his name. It is stated that second to fourth respondents moved an application on which they were impleaded in the case which led to the plaint being amended wherein the petitioner (as the plaintiff) also sought the relief of prohibitory injunction against them from entering into the subject ...
Ministry of Home Affairs vs.ramesh Chander and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 753/2018 and CM APPL. 3145-47/2018 MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus RAMESH CHANDER AND ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER3101.2018 The petitioner/Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India has 1. challenged an order dated 12.08.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, allowing O.A. No.1056/2012 filed by the respondent No.1 herein for granting him regular promotion against vacancies in the Junior Administrative Grade-II (in short JAG-II) of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli Civil Service (in short, DANICS) and promote him from the date the vacancy had arisen, with all consequential benefits w.e.f. 01.07.2009, the date when his juniors were granted regularisation with retrospe...
Ajanta Raj Proteins Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.himanshu Foods Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :3. dJanuary, 2018 Date of decision :31. t January, 2018 RFA22016 AJANTA RAJ PROTEINS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. V.N. Chaturvedi, Advocate. (M-9810280191) HIMANSHU FOODS PVT LTD ..... Respondent versus Through : Mr. Shalabh Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.Himanshu Foods Private Limited (hereinafter, Plaintiff) filed a suit 1. for recovery of Rs.15,00,000/- under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter, CPC). Ajanta Raj Proteins Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, Defendant) filed two applications for leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 3 and under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The said applications were dismissed by the Trial court. Leave to defend was refused. The suit of the Plaintiff was decreed for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- with costs and pendente lite and future interest @ 18% per annum. Plaintiffs case The Plaintiff claims to be a supplier of skimmed ...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.kamini Sharma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. h January, 2018 Date of decision :31. t January, 2018 RFA2972015 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla & Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates. (M-9810080772) versus KAMINI SHARMA & ANR. Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT ........ RESPONDENTS Prathiba M. Singh, J.The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment/order dated 1. 6th February, 2015 by which the suit recovery filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff bank (hereinafter, Plaintiff bank) was dismissed. The primary ground on which the suit had been dismissed was that the Plaintiff bank had failed to file the original loan recall notice dated 11th February, 2014 in the Trial court. for Brief Background The... RESPONDENTS/Defendants (hereinafter, Defendants) approached 2. the Plaintiff bank for financing of the purchase of a vehicle under loan cum hypothecation scheme for a sum of Rs.11,50,000/-. The Defendants agreed to repay ...
p.p.s Kapoor and Ors. Vs.food Corporation of India (Through: Its Chair ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 791/2018 Date of Decision: January 31, 2018 1. P.P.S KAPOOR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik & Mr. Devik Singh, Advocates Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (THROUGH: ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC & Mr. Harsh Pandit & Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shahi, Advocate for respondents No.2, 3,4 & 5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL This is second round of litigation. In the first round of litigation, respondent-Food Corporation of India (FCI) was called upon to decide petitioners Representation, which stands decided vide impugned order of 1st March, 2017. All that has been said in the impugned order is that Department of Public Enterprises has not issued any guidelines for enhancing the ceiling of gratuity of Central Public Enterprises employees drawing Central Dearness Allowance (CDA) w.e.f. 1st January...
Kamal Saxena vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : January 31st, 2018 CRL.A. 1275/2013 RAVINDER @ BINDA Through: Mr.R.M. Chaudhary, Advocates. versus ..... Appellant Tufail, Mr.Farooq Ms.Astha, STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jeetendra Singh, Police Station Subhash Place, New Delhi. WITH + CRL.A. 1406/2013 KAMAL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.Singhal and Ms.Sana, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jeetendra Crl.A.1275/13,1406/13,204/14&4Page 1of 46 Singh, Police Station Subhash Place, New Delhi. WITH + CRL.A.204/2014 BUNTY Through: Mr.Praveen Advocate. versus ..... Appellant Agrawal, STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jeetendra Singh, Police Station Subhash Place, New Delhi. AND + CRL.A. 415/2014 B...
M/S Konka Group Company Ltd vs.m/s A2vp Distributors & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:31. t January, 2018 FAO(OS) 29/2017 & CM Nos.3587, 35020, 35021/2017 M/S KONKA GROUP COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sushant Kumar, Mr. Arjun Singh and Mr. A. Madhukar, Advs. versus M/S A2VP DISTRIBUTORS & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anant Garg with Mr. Avimanniyu Sharma, Advs. + FAO(OS) 66/2017 M/S A2VP DISTRIBUTORS PVT LTD & ANR. .... Appellant Through: Mr. Anant Garg with Mr. Avimanniyu Sharma, Advs. versus M/S KONKA GROUP COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sushant Kumar, Mr. Arjun Singh and Mr. A. Madhukar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 FAO (OS) No.29/2017 has been filed by Ms. Konka Group FAO(OS) Nos.29/2017 & 66/2017 Pg.1 of 4 Company Ltd. under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to...
M/S. P. G. Sons Huf vs.lalit M. Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t January, 2018 + CM(M) 65/2016 and CM APPL.2304/2016 (stay) M/S. P. G. SONS HUF ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.L. Mahajan, Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Advocate LALIT M. SHARMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the plaintiff of suit (Suit No.45/15) wherein the respondent is the defendant, the prayer made being for the reliefs in the nature of decree of possession and mesne profits in respect of premises in which the defendant admittedly is a tenant. It appears while resisting the suit, the defendant (the respondent herein) has taken the position that tenancy was created, not orally but by a lease agreement dated 10.08.1996 and further that at the time of creation of the tenancy, security amount of Rs.11,00,000/- had been paid which needs to be accounted for.2. The plaintiff had moved an application under Order XII Rule 6 of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »