Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Sunair Hotels Ltd. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2018 + CRL.M.C. 2345/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.8181/2015 & 11749/2015 + VIPUL GUPTA Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gurpreet Singh and Mr. Jatin S. Sethi, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Rajbir Singh Gulia, Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Mr.Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr.Raghvendra Mishra & Ms. Vedika Mittal, Advocates for respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 2365/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.8240/2015 & 11755/2015 S P GUPTA Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal & Mr. Gurpreet ........ Petitioner versus Singh, Advocates. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 2345/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 24 + + Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harish Pandey, Mr. Rajbir Singh Gulia, Mr. Asho...
Pushkar vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~36 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :23. d JANUARY, 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 37/2018 PUSHKAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vipin, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP. Mr.Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. CRL.REV.P. 38/2018 PUSHKAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vipin, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Mr.Abhishek Agarwal, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) Crl.Rev.372018 & connected matter Page 1 of 4 CRL.M.A.No.1389/2018 in CRL.REV.P. 37/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.1386/2018 in CRL.REV.P. 38/2018 1. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the files are taken up today for consideration.2. The applications stand disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 37/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.682/2018 & CRL.REV.P. 38/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.693/2018 1. Crl.Rev.P.37/2018 has been prefe...
Lala Ram and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11936/2015 LALA RAM AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M. Amanullah and Mr. M.B. Tariq, Advocates GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meera Bhatia, Standing Counsel for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Counter affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the LAC, copy of which has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. Counter affidavit be taken on record.2. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the l...
Preeti vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PREETI Decided on:23. d January, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 244/2018 ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Ms. Samia Malik and Mr. Ankit Mutreja, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Jagdish, PS Shalimar Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.1390/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 244/2018 1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the opinion of the investigation agency having declined to incorporate Section 304 Part-II IPC in the FIR No.497/2017 under Sections 279/304A IPC be set aside and the State be directed to incorporate the Section 304 Part-II IPC and also transfer the investigation to CBI.2. The petitioner is the unfortunate wife of the deceased Vikas who died on 20th October, 2017. FIR No.497/2017 under Sections 279/304A ...
Kanika Gandotra vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~52 * % + W.P.(C) 8151/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :23. d January, 2018 KANIKA GANDOTRA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha and Ms.Worthing Kajar, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocate. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs.Koumudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.33505/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W. P. (C) 8151/2017 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.1099 Min admeasuring 1 Bigha, situated in the revenue estate of Village Malikpur Kohi @ Ra...
Prashant vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~5 to 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1055/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2046/2017 RAJU STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri * 5+ 6+ CRL.A. 1056/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2047/2017 PRASHANT ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri ..... Respondent 7+ CRL.A. 1079/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2089/2017 MUNNI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate versus CRL.A. 1055/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 STATE Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri 8 + CRL.A. 1121/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2169/2017 SURESH @ BANTI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.K.Parameshwar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru...
Shri Vinod Kumar Sachdeva and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment :23. d January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5802/2016 SHRI VINOD KUMAR SACHDEVA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S K. Rout, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for Jyoti Tyagi, LAC/L&B with Ms. Advocate. Mr. Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocate. Sabharwal, Sanjeev CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land admeasuring 01 Bigha out of Khasra Nos. 2610/728-729 situated in the revenue estate of Village Tuglakabad, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Subject Land), has lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (he...
Ms. C (Name and Address Confidential) vs.indian Institute of Corporate ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~25 * + W.P.(C) 455/2018 and CM Nos. 1984/2018, 1985/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI & 1998/2018 MS. C (NAME AND ADDRESS CONFIDENTIAL) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Vrinda Grover, Ms Ratna Appnender and Mr Soutik Banerjee, Advocates. versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr Kamaldeep, Advocate for R Mr R.C. Meena, Ex-Regional Director (ER) & (NER), Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Govt. of India. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2301.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner, whose name is concealed to avoid any ignominy, has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to respondent nos. 5 to 10 - persons constituting the Internal Complaints Committee (hereafter the ICC) - to comply with the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (hereafter the Act).2. The petitioner claims that on 10....
Dheer Singh vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6641/2017 and CM APPL. 27599/2017 DHEER SINGH Through: Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Feroz Khan, CISF. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2301.2018 1. The petitioner assails an order dated 18.07.2017 passed by the respondent No.3/CISF, rejecting his application for a re-medical examination on being disqualified for medical reasons during the process of recruitment of Sub-Inspectors in Delhi Police, CAPFs and ASI in CISF2016Examination. The petitioner has also challenged an order dated 21.04.2017 passed by the respondent No.2/SSC, declaring him unfit for recruitment to the post of SI in the CISF on 21.04.2017, on account of suffering from (i) low near eye, (ii) tachycardia, (iii) hypertension and (iv) tremors.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as gathered from the records a...
Vikram Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6268/2017 VIKRAM SINGH7h November, 2017 Reserved on : Date of decision :23. d January, 2018 Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr. Santosh ........ RESPONDENTS Kumar Pandey, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.The petitioner challenges the imposition, legality and validity of compounding fee - a fee charged under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short,`the Act'), to compound offences committed by assessees. Challenge has been primarily raised to the legality of the quantum of compounding fee, as prescribed by guidelines issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (for short, CBDT) dated 23rd December, 2014 and seeks quashing of the same as being arbitrary and unfair. The petitioner further seeks setting aside of the compo...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »