Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lachman Singh vs.birender Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2018 CM(M) 104/2018 and CM30623063/2018 LACHMAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P.S. Sirohi and Mr. Sunil Sirohi, Advocates versus BIRENDER PRASAD ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The civil suit (CS57895/16) in which the impugned order dated 01.12.2017 was passed by the Additional District Judge has been instituted by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioner (defendant). By the impugned order, the Additional District Judge dismissed the application of the defendant seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) with which the defendant is aggrieved and has come up to this Court by the petition at hand.2. Though the copy of the plaint has not been filed with the petition, a copy was shown during the hearing, it revealing that the suit was presented on 02.12.2010 seeking a decree of specific ...
Prabhat Kumar Sharma & Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :17. h November, 2017 Date of decision :24. h January, 2018 + FAO(OS) 200/2017 and CM Nos.24273-74/2017 ..... Appellants PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMA & ANR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through : Mr. V.N. Koura with Ms. versus Angeli Dayal and Mr. Nikhil Mundeja and Mr. Anupam Roy, Advs. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Ms. + W.P.(C) 365/2017, CM Nos.1652/2017, 22028-29/2017, 27106/2017, 29105/2017, 33993/2017, 35310/2017 & Rev.P.No.269/2017 DEEPAK BATRA AND ANR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR Through : Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. versus ........ Petitioners Ms. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj and Mr. Amit Mehta, Advs. for applicant in CM Nos.22028- 29/2017. Mr. S.P. Kalra, Sr. Adv with W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 1 of 95 Mr. Anshu...
Vinod Mehra vs.arun Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2018 C.R.P. 197/2015 and CM Nos.32580/2015, 32581/2015 and 32583/2015 VINOD MEHRA Through: None versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through: None ARUN MEHRA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand seeks to assail the order dated 21.05.2015 of the Additional District Judge whereby he dismissed the application of the petitioner (defendant before the trial Court) for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) in the suit (CS942012) instituted by the respondent (plaintiff before the trial Court) on 06.12.2012 seeking a decree for recovery of money in the sum of Rs.18,50,000/- with interest pendente lite and future, on the ground of want of territorial jurisdiction.2. When the matter was called out in its turn, the counsel for the petitioner sought an adjournment on the ground that he is engaging the opposite party in an effor...
Rambir vs.jawaharlal Nehru University and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 24, 2018 W.P.(C) 705/2018 & CMs 3030-31/2018 RAMBIR Through: Mr. Joby Varghese, Mr. Apurv Chandola and Mr. Nishant Rai, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC and Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is a Professional Assistant in respondent-University, who had sought promotion to the post of Assistant Librarian and as per recommendation of Departmental Promotion Committee (for short DPC) of 14th September, 2017 (Annexure P-1), petitioner was not considered for promotion for the reason that he did not fulfil the eligibility criteria.2.... Petitioner claims to be a Scheduled Caste candidate and according to petitioners counsel, one post of Scheduled Caste category is still vacant, but is likely to be filled up soon by convening a DPC without any W.P.(C) 705/2018 Page 1 of 3 notice ...
Surender Singh vs.narender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"24th January, 2018 RC.REV. 316/2012 & CM No.12066/2012 SURENDER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Proxy versus Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Saxena, Advocate NARENDER KUMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The revision petition at hand has been filed seeking to assail the order dated 31.03.2012 passed by the Additional Rent Controller on the file of eviction case (E-185/2011) thereby dismissing the application of the petitioner (tenant/respondent before the Rent Controller) seeking leave to defend the proceedings arising out of the petition presented by the respondent (landlord/petitioner before the Rent Controller) on the ground of bonafide need under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 and in the consequence granting an order of eviction in respect of demised premises described as one shop admeasuring 26.5 x 8.25 bearing shop No.3926 & 3919/28, now know...
Info Edge(india) Ltd vs.akash Deep & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
$~OS-1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 366/2016 INFO EDGE(INDIA) LTD ..... Plaintiff Date of Decision :24. 01.2018 Through Ms.Anuradha Salhotra and Mr.Yatin Grover, Advs. versus ..... Defendant Through Defendants No.1, 2 and 4 are ex parte AKASH DEEP & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed seeking a decree of permanent injunction against the defendants etc. from using the mark CVNAUKRI.COM, CVNAUKRI.CO.IN, CVNAUKRI.IN, CVNAUKRI.ORG AND RESUMENAUKRI.COM or any other mark consisting the word NAUKRI as a prefix or suffix. Other consequential reliefs are also sought.2. As per the plaint Defendant No.4 is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and first and second defendants are the Directors of Defendant No.4. Defendant No.3 is the person who has created the website. It may be noted that as far as defendant No.3 is concerned the matter was settled with the plaintiff. On 12.05.2017 the statement/ unde...
Raju vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~5 to 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1055/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2046/2017 RAJU STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri * 5+ 6+ CRL.A. 1056/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2047/2017 PRASHANT ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.Jagat Rana, Advocate with Mr.Abhinav Dang, Advocate versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri ..... Respondent 7+ CRL.A. 1079/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2089/2017 MUNNI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Avinash, Advocate versus CRL.A. 1055/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 STATE Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS- Jahangirpuri 8 + CRL.A. 1121/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 2169/2017 SURESH @ BANTI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.K.Parameshwar, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru...
Nanni Bai Ahirwar vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
$~51 * % + W.P.(C) 673/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :23. d January, 2018 NANNI BAI AHIRWAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N. K. Sahoo and Mr. S. B. Sahoo, Advocate. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, Mr. Rajinder Yadav, Mr. Simar Pal Singh and Ms.Guneet Khehar, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC for R-2 with Mr. Manashwy Jha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 filed by the petitioner. The petitioner claims to be a squatting near out gate of LIC building nearby boundary wall of the parking, Janpath, New Delhi since the year 1988. As per the petitioner, she was granted licence in the year 1992 for selling uncut fruits on cycle and this licnece is valid till April, 2020.2. Learned counsel for th...
Abhinav Pandey vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + W.P.(C) 2028/2016 & C.M. No.8746/2016 Judgment reserved on :15. 01.2018 Judgment delivered on:23. 01.2018 ABHINAV PANDEY ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Amit George, Mr.Swaroop George, Ms.Rajsree Ajay, Advocates. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Ekta Sikri and Mr.Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Sahil Munjal and Ms.Shea Gandhi Munjal, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1... Petitioner was enrolled in the 5 year course of B.A.LL.B in the year 2010 at the Amity Law School affiliated to the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (respondent no.2 and respondent no.1 respectively). For his 6th semester examination out of 5 papers he could not appear in 2 papers i.e. the paper of Code of Civil Procedure and the paper of Code of Criminal Procedure; these two examinations were scheduled for 29.5.2013 W.P.(C) No2028/2016 Page 1 of 14 and 31....
Pooja Landol vs.university of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. 01.2018 LPA6242017, C.M. NOS. 44396/2017, 34415/2017 & 2639/2018 PADMA LANDOL . Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Mishra and Mr. Rahul Dutta, Advocates. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal with Ms. Slomita Rai and Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates, for University of Delhi. Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Advocate, for BCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of a learned Single Judge by which her writ petition for relief against Delhi University, which required her to enroll in the three year LL.M degree (instead of the two year degree, opted by her) was rejected.2. The petitioner/appellant applied for the two year LL.M degree course, after completing her LL.B degree. She was selected but asked to join the three year LL.M course, instead of the two year course she had app...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »