Skip to content

Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 24 2018

Deepak Batra and Anr vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :17. h November, 2017 Date of decision :24. h January, 2018 + FAO(OS) 200/2017 and CM Nos.24273-74/2017 ..... Appellants PRABHAT KUMAR SHARMA & ANR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through : Mr. V.N. Koura with Ms. versus Angeli Dayal and Mr. Nikhil Mundeja and Mr. Anupam Roy, Advs. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Ms. + W.P.(C) 365/2017, CM Nos.1652/2017, 22028-29/2017, 27106/2017, 29105/2017, 33993/2017, 35310/2017 & Rev.P.No.269/2017 DEEPAK BATRA AND ANR GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR Through : Mr. Rishabh Bansal, Mr. Ajay Arjun Sharma, Advs. versus ........ Petitioners Ms. ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj and Mr. Amit Mehta, Advs. for applicant in CM Nos.22028- 29/2017. Mr. S.P. Kalra, Sr. Adv with W.P.(C)No.365/2017 & FAO(OS)No.200/2017 Page 1 of 95 Mr. Anshu...


Jan 24 2018

Ravinder Gosain vs.punjab & Sind Bank

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 24, 2018 W.P. (C) 716/2018 & CM30682018 RAVINDER GOSAIN Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus PUNJAB & SIND BANK CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate .... Respondent ORDER (ORAL) In pursuance of charge-sheet of 20th December, 2012 penalty of reduction by two stages in the time scale of pay permanently has been inflicted upon petitioner after he had retired as General Manager of respondent-Bank on 31st December, 2012.... Petitioners appeal against aforesaid penalty stands dismissed vide order of 23rd January, 2017 (Annexure P-2).2. The challenge to penalty order as well as appellate order by learned counsel for petitioner is on merits as well as on the plea of lack of authority in imposing the aforesaid penalty. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to decision of the Supreme Court in UCO Bank and Ors. v. Prabhakar Sadashiv Karvade, in ...


Jan 24 2018

Hanif (Deleted) & Ors vs.sant Singh Bal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h January, 2018 CM(M) 518/2017 and CM175282017 HANIF (DELETED) & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate versus SANT SINGH BAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Singh Chaudhary, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioners were not defendants in the civil suit (now registered as CS SCJ840342016) when it was originally presented against one Hanif shown as second defendant, the prayer being for decree of possession, payment of rent and mesne profits in respect of property described as shop no.8, situated in Khasra No.27, Village Saidulajab, Opposite Saket, New Delhi, the respondent being the plaintiff. The cause title (of the parties) is defective as the reference to the name of deceased Hanif is incorrect and misleading.2. The plaintiff statedly realised the need to implead the petitioners as defendants upon an application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civi...


Jan 24 2018

Sumtech Engineers Private Limited vs.guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary Me ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on:24. h January, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 32/2018 SUMTECH ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Vikas Upadhyay, Mr.Vidit Monga and Mr.Bhanwarjit Singh, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH TRICENTENARY MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Samrat Nigam and Mr.Vijayender Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.CAV582018 1.2. Counsel as above appears for the respondent/caveator. The caveat is discharged. IA No.1128/2018 3.4. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(COMM.) 32/2018 Page 1 of 11 OMP (COMM) No.32/2018 5. Issue notice. The learned counsel accepts notice.6. With the consent of the learned counsels for parties petition is taken up for hearing.7. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as the Act) against the impugned...


Jan 24 2018

Lalit Tyagi vs.arvind Tyagi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LALIT TYAGI RFA No.8/2018 24th January, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Mohod, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Sonkar, Advocate. versus ARVIND TYAGI CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.174/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.173/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 10 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.8/2018 and C.M. No.172/2018 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment/order of the Trial RFA No.8/2018 Page 1 of 3 Court dated 16.8.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed under Order XXXVII CPC by the respondent/plaintiff as the appellant/defendant had failed to comply with the earlier order dated 15.7.2017 granti...


Jan 24 2018

Pradeep Kumar vs.the District & Sessions Judge (Headquarters)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: January 24, 2018 W.P.(C) 738/2018 & C.M. 3117/2018 1. PRADEEP KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advocates Versus THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE (HEADQUARTERS) Through: Mr.Sanjay Dewan & Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.1 ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL... Petitioner was promoted as Judicial Assistant on 23rd August, 2017. In this petition, promotion to the post of Judicial Assistant is claimed w.e.f. 13th June, 2008, while claiming parity with employees at Serial Nos. 170 to 183 (except Sl. No.177) in the Order of 23rd August, 2017 (Annexure P-6). To seek the relief claimed in this petition, petitioner had made a Representation on 25th September, 2017, followed by a reminder on 17th November, 2017 (Annexure P-7 colly). According to petitioners counsel, there is no response to these Representations. However, it is submitted that the case o...


Jan 24 2018

Lens. Com, Inc. Vs.ju J Friend International

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h January, 2018 OMP(COMM) 223/2016 LENS. COM, INC. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Jai A. Dehadrai, Mr.Shivangini Gupta, Mr.Sidharth Arora, Mr.David George & Mr.Anil Mishra, Advs. versus JU J FRIEND INTERNATIONAL Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner, Lens. Com, Inc challenging the arbitral award dated 29th June, 2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. The arbitration was conducted under the .In Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP) published by the National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI).2. The petitioner, claiming itself to be a renowned Multinational Company incorporated in USA and dealing in online business of selling contact lenses to the consumers in North America and globally, filed a complaint before NIXI against the respondent seeking tr...


Jan 24 2018

Corruption Against Society Regd vs.gnct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12019/2016 & CM No.47421/2016 % Date of decision :24. h January, 2018 CORRUPTION AGAINST SOCIETY REGD ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Arun Kaushal and Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advs. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC- GNCTD/R-1 with Mr. R.A. Iyer and Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC for R- DDA with Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Arun Monga, Mr. Suryajyoti Paul Singh, Ms. Divya Sharma and Ms. Marcellina Kalikotey, Advs. for R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE W.P.(C)No.12019/2016 Page 1 of 7 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayers from this court: Issue writ in the nature of mandamus directing thereby a. the respondent no.8 & 9 to re-affix DDA sign board over the DDA land bearing khasra Nos. 546/491/421 Min, 548/492/421 Min,Min, 431 Min, 432 Min, 421 M...


Jan 24 2018

Ravi Kumar vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on- 16th January, 2018 Date of Pronouncement- 24th January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9951/2017 1. RAVI KUMAR Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Advocate Chauhan, ........ Petitioner Mr.Parvinder with Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R Mr.Ankur Chibbar, Advocate GNCTD. for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT The petitioner, who is a third year student of B.Tech having been enrolled in the B.Tech. Computer Science course in 2015 in Delhi Technological University i.e. respondent no.2, has filed the present petition being aggrieved by an order dated 03.11.2017 vide which he has been rusticated for the ongoing academic year i.e. 2017-2018 with a further direction that he has to complete his B.Tech degree in five years. The said order passed by the Board of Discipline of the respondent no.2/University also bans the entry of the petitioner in the campus for th...


Jan 24 2018

Shahid Ahmad Ansari vs.govt. Of Nct Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-24-2018

* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 24, 2018 W.P.(C) 7657/2017 SHAHID AHMAD ANSARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Javed Ahmed and Ms. Syed Maria Aijaz, Advocates Versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shahid Ahmed Ansari, Advocate Mr. Pushpinder Kaur, DEO, Zone-08 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks release of arrears of Selection Grade by asserting that the Selection Grade stands granted to him in pursuance of Departmental Promotion Committees meeting of 23rd September, 2016, with effect from 1st January, 1998.2. Attention of this Court is drawn to order of 20th February, 2017 passed in CONT.CAS.(C) 54/2017 titled Shahid Ahmad Ansari v. Punya Sahiy Srivastava & Ors., filed by petitioner. Vide aforesaid order, Contempt Petition has been disposed of as infructuous as respondent- School has already intimated respondent-Directorate of Education vide letter of 28th January, 2017 as reproduced ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial