Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devender Dass vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 299/2015 Date of Decision: January 27, 2018 DEVENDER DASS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, DHLSC panel counsel & Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Puneet Grewal, police station Shahbad Dairy CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant is husband of the deceased, who was tried for having murdered his wife on the intervening night of 31st October and 1st November, 2012. Vide impugned judgment of 28th November, 2014, appellant has been held guilty for offence of murder and vide order of even date, he has been sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of `10,000/- and in default of payment, he has been directed to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months.2. The prosecution case, stands unfolded in the opening paragraph of the impugned judgment and so, ...
Virendra Jain vs.enforcement Directorate Delhi Zonal Office Zone Ii Ne ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h January, 2018 Decided on:25. h January, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 1113/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.244/2018 VIRENDRA JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. S.P. Singh, Mr. Rishi Sehgal and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE DELHI ZONAL OFFICE ZONE II NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Nitesh Rana, SPP and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Advocate. + BAIL APPLN. 1114/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.239/2018 SURENDER KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. S.P. Singh, Mr. Rishi Sehgal and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE DELHI ZONEL OFFICE ZONE II NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Nitesh Rana, SPP and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Advocate. BAIL APPLN. 1113/2017 & 1114/20...
Surender Kumar Jain vs.enforcement Directorate Delhi Zonel Office Zone ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h January, 2018 Decided on:25. h January, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 1113/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.244/2018 VIRENDRA JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. S.P. Singh, Mr. Rishi Sehgal and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE DELHI ZONAL OFFICE ZONE II NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Nitesh Rana, SPP and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Advocate. + BAIL APPLN. 1114/2017 and Crl. M.A. No.239/2018 SURENDER KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sethi, Mr. S.P. Singh, Mr. Rishi Sehgal and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE DELHI ZONEL OFFICE ZONE II NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr. Nitesh Rana, SPP and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Advocate. BAIL APPLN. 1113/2017 & 1114/20...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.m/s M. Gulab Singh & Sons P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.67/2018 + % THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Reserved on:22. d January, 2018 Pronounced on:25. h January, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh and Ms. Seerat Deep Singh, Advocates. versus M/s M. GULAB SINGH & SONS P. LTD. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant/tenant impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 9.5.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondent/plaintiff/landlord with respect to mesne profits. The suit premises is an area of 11276 sq. ft. in the first floor (rear wing) of the building known as Gulab Bhawan, 6, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi. It may be noted that the appellant/defendant/tenant has RFA No.67/2018 Page 1 of 6 already vacated the suit premises on...
Hemant Dandona vs.naveen Bareja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-25-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 537/2017 HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BAREJA Represented by: Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav ..... Respondent + CRL.L.P. 538/2017 Mehdiratta, Advocates. HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BAREJA Represented by: Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav ..... Respondent + CRL.L.P. 539/2017 Mehdiratta, Advocates. HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BAREJA Represented by: Mr. D.S. Kohli and Mr. Raghav ..... Respondent + CRL.L.P. 540/2017 Mehdiratta, Advocates. HEMANT DANDONA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. CRL.L.P. 537/2017 and Conn. matters Page 1 of 4 versus Priyanka Tiwary an...
Shashi Bahadur & Anr. Vs.malka Bahadur (Since Deceased) Through Her l. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SHASHI BAHADUR & ANR. Through: versus RFA No.72/2018 24th January, 2018 ..... Appellants Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Gayatri Nandwani, Advocates. MALKA BAHADUR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER L.R. ABHA NARAIN (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Amrita Sanghi and Mr. Akshay Sharma, Advs. with respondents in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat Nos. 50-51/2018 Counsel appears for the caveators. Caveats accordingly stand discharged. RFA No.72/2018 & CM No.2749/2018 (stay) & CM No.2750/2018 (seeking summoning of the trial court record) and CM No.2751/2018 (Exemption) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 12.10.2017 by RFA No.72/2018 Page 1 of 15 which the trial court has decreed the suit filed f...
M/S Madhan and Company & Ors. Vs.punjab & Sind Bank & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.73/2018 + % M/s MADHAN AND COMPANY & ORS. 24th January, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rama Shanker, Mr. S.Katyal, Ms. Seema Sharma and Mr. Saurabh, Advocates. versus PUNJAB & SIND BANK & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harish Katyal and Ms. Pratyasha Kunj, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.2823/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.2824/2018 (delay in re-filing of 9 days) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing the appeal is condoned subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.73/2018 Page 1 of 18 RFA No.73/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.2822/2018 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by defendant nos. 1 to 3 in the suit impugning the ju...
Kotak Mahindra Bank vs.mr.s.nagabhushan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) 341/2017 Reserved on:18. h December, 2017 Date of decision:24. h January, 2018 KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK Petitioner Through: Mr. Kaushik Mishra, Advocate Versus MR.S.NAGABHUSHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bheemsain Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 07.04.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in Case No.ARB/DKS/34/2016 titled M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank v. S.Nagabhushan & Ors. (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Award). The Impugned Award holds that as the petitioner was not a signatory to the Loan Agreement executed between the respondent nos. 1 and 2 on the one hand and respondent No.3 on the other, the reference of the disputes to arbitration by the petitioner was not maintainable and the Sole Arbitrator does not have ju...
Jasbir Singh vs.rajesh Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS)(COMM) 11/2017 Date of decision:24. h January, 2018. JASBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjiv Narula, Mr. Rohit Nagpal and Mr. Jaspreet S. Rai, Advocates. versus RAJESH GOEL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tushar Rao, Mr. Vipin Nair, Mr. Sohil Yadav, Mr. Tushar Bhardwaj and Mr. Naveen Hegde, Advocates. Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr. Aditya Sharma and Mr. Chatanya Puri, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The appellant, defendant in CS(COMM) 1349/2016, has filed the present intra-court appeal impugning order dated 16th May, 2017 passed in IA No.5105/2017 filed by the respondent/plaintiff, under Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. RFA(OS)(COMM) No.11/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. The impugned order allows the application of the respondent/plaintiff and decrees the suit for principal amount of Rs.1,61,26,938/- ...
Virender @ Dhulla vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2018
+ % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 268/2015 Reserved on: December 14, 2017 Date of decision: January 24, 2018 VIRENDER @ DHULLA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rasheed Hashmi, Advocate. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. PP with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGEMENT I.S.Mehta, J.1. Instant appeal is arising out of judgment dated 30th September, 2014 and order on sentence dated 3rd November, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Court, in Case RC.3(S)/98/SCB- II/DLI registered at Police Station S.P. Badli under SectionsIPC, whereby the appellant-accused has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment along with fine of Rs.30,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one year; the appellant-accused has also been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of further ten year...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »