Delhi Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited vs.malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 09.2017 Pronounced on:31. 01.2018 O.M.P.(EFA)(COMM.) 6/2016 DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Adv. and Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Amit Mishra, Mr.Mohit Singh, Ms.Hima Lawrence, Mr.Akshay Puri, Mr.Keshav Raychaudhuri, Mr.Rohan Jaitley, Mr.Aditya Shankar, Mr.Mikhil Sharda, Mr.Jayvardhan Singh, Mr.Shivam Pandey, Ms.Samridhi Hota & Mr.Samaksh Goyal, Advs. Mr.Abhijeet Sinha, versus MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Harish N.Salve, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Anuradha Dutt, Ms.Fereshte D.Sethna, Ms.Vijaylakshmi Menon, Ms.Ekta Kapil, Ms.Neeharika Aggarwal, Ms.Akanshsa Banerjee, Mr.Anirudh Bakhru & Mr.Chaitanya Kaushik, Advs. for R-1 to 4 & R-13. Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocates for R-5 and 9 to 12. Mr.Rohit Chaudhary and Ms.Preeti Kohli, Advs. for R-6 to R-8. Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr.Adv. wit...
Albin Baby vs.central Board of Secondary Education & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision - 31.01.2018 + W.P.(C) 2029/2017 ALBIN BABY Through Mr.Wills Mathews, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Ajit Singh Arora with Mr.J.K.Sharma, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The... Petitioner, a student of Respondent No.2-school seeks issuance of a direction to Respondent No.1 to correct the error in spelling the name of his mother as appearing in the 'Grade Sheet cum Certificate of Performance' dated 28.05.2015 issued by Respondent No.1. The... Petitioner had appeared for his class 10th board examination conducted by Respondent No.1 in the academic year 2014-2015 as a student of Respondent No.2-school. In the Class 10th Grade Sheet cum Certificate of Performance issued by Respondent No.1 on 28.05.2015 the name of his mother was recorded as "Sophiama Baby". WP(C) No.202...
Tahir Hussain vs.jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 31, 2018 W.P.(C) 877/2018 & CM37192018 TAHIR HUSSAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Prithu Garg, Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh and Mr. Siddharth Mehta, Advocates versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC and Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advocate for respondent-JNU CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned Notification of 6th October, 2017 (Annexure P-1) amends the Recruitment Rules of Non-Teaching Posts for Grade B and Grade C of Ministerial and Secretarial Cadre and thereby dispenses with the interview for the said posts.... Petitioner had applied for the post of Junior Assistant-cum-Typist way back on 13th November, 2013 and had undertaken Skill Test and Written Test on 25th May, 2016 and as per the Result (Annexure P-10) of Written Test held on 25th May, 2016, petitioner has qualified and so, petitioner was waiting for the interview call. Vide another Notification ...
Bunty vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : January 31st, 2018 CRL.A. 1275/2013 RAVINDER @ BINDA Through: Mr.R.M. Chaudhary, Advocates. versus ..... Appellant Tufail, Mr.Farooq Ms.Astha, STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jeetendra Singh, Police Station Subhash Place, New Delhi. WITH + CRL.A. 1406/2013 KAMAL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.Singhal and Ms.Sana, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jeetendra Crl.A.1275/13,1406/13,204/14&4Page 1of 46 Singh, Police Station Subhash Place, New Delhi. WITH + CRL.A.204/2014 BUNTY Through: Mr.Praveen Advocate. versus ..... Appellant Agrawal, STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Sub-Inspector Jeetendra Singh, Police Station Subhash Place, New Delhi. AND + CRL.A. 415/2014 B...
Evolve Info Train India Pvt Ltd vs.versatile Commotrade Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~6 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 299/2017 & CM Nos.42674-75/2017 Date of Decision:31. t January, 2018 EVOLVE INFO TRAIN INDIA PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K. Datta with Mr. Aditya Gupta, Advs. versus VERSATILE COMMOTRADE PVT LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Krishanan, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Ankit Kakkar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.42674/2017 (for condonation of delay) Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CM No.42675/2017 By this application the appellant seeks leave to appeal under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter CPC) to challenge the impugned order dated 8th August, 2017 FAO (OS) No.299/2017 Pg.1 of 9 passed in I.A. No.8896/2017 in CS (OS) No.802/2014. The appellant has stated that it is the owner of the prope...
Prabhjot Singh Kohli vs.raghbir Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.41/2018 + % PRABHJOT SINGH KOHLI31t January, 2018 ..... Plaintiff Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advocate. Through: versus RAGHBIR SINGH & ORS. ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) I.A. No.1432/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. I.A. stands disposed of. CS(OS) No.41/2018 and I.A. Nos.1431/2018 (stay) & 1433/2018 (under Section 80 and 151 CPC) 2. This suit for partition and injunction is filed by the plaintiff who is the son of Sh. Mohan Singh Kohli. Sh. Mohan Singh Kohli was the son of late Sh. Jagat Singh Kohli and whose three properties are subject matter of the present suit for partition. The plaintiffs father and defendant nos.1 to 8 in the suit are children of CS(OS) No.41/2018 Page 1 of 7 late Sh. Jagat Singh Kohli. Plaintiff along with defendant nos.9 to 17 are the grandchildren and great grandchildren of Sh. Jagat Singh Ko...
Rafiq Ahmed vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:31. t January, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6337/2016 RAFIQ AHMED Through: Mr.Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr.Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate for respondent/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.409 admeasuring 130 square yards, situated in the revenue estate of Village Jasola, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stand lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair W.P. (C) No.6337/2016 ...
M/S Icici Bank Limited vs.sunil Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. h January, 2018 Date of decision :31. t January, 2018 RFA3402015 M/S ICICI BANK LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla & Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates. (M-9810080772) versus SUNIL SHARMA Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment/order dated 1. 7th March, 2015 by which the recovery filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff bank (hereinafter, Plaintiff bank) was dismissed. The primary ground on which the suit had been dismissed was that the Plaintiff bank had failed to file the original loan recall notice dated 10th August, 2012 in the Trial court. suit for Brief Background The Respondent/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) approached the 2. Plaintiff bank for financing of the purchase of a vehicle under loan cum hypothecation scheme for a sum of Rs.5,53,000/-. The Defendant agreed to repay the loan amount in 60 equ...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.vidya Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~17 * % + MAC.APP. 1079/2017 and C.M. Appl. 44655/2017 Date of Decision:31. t January, 2018 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Advocate versus VIDYA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.K.K.Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of 17,31,898/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. On 25th July, 2012, Vikas was sitting on the motorcycle as a pillion rider driven by Ajay when they were hit by car bearing No.DL-3CAL-0562. The accident resulted in injuries to Vikas as well as Ajay. However, Vikas succumbed to the injuries on 30th July, 2012. The deceased, Vikas was survived by his widow and mother.3. The deceased was an electrician by profession holding a Diploma in wireman trade from Lal Hnas Raj Gupta Industrial, Training Institute, DSIDC, Industrial Complex,...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.ijm Corporation Berhad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2018
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t January, 2018 ARB.A. (COMM) 55/2017 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Renu Gupta and Ms.Rijuta Mohanty, Advs. versus IJM CORPORATION BERHAD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Shambhu Sharan, Mr.Yaman Deep Kumar and Mr.Shashank Bhanshali, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) I.A. No.15541/2017 (Delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in re-filing of the present appeal.2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the application is misconceived inasmuch as there is a delay in filing of the appeal itself. He submits that the appeal was filed on 20.12.2017, which is beyond the period of limitation. He further submits that in the application seeking stay of the Impugned Order, there is a reference to an order passed by the Arbitrator on 10.10.2017, therefore, it should be presumed that the appeal has been ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »