Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ronak Singhal vs.central Board of Secondary Education & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :25. 08.2017 Judgment delivered on :04. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 6087/2016 RONAK SINGHAL Versus ........ Petitioner Ms Namita Roy and Mr Gautam, Advs CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Atul Kumar, Adv for R-1 Ms Nishtha, Adv for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner before this Court is Ronak Singhal. He was born on 27.09.1995 to his parents namely Sanjay Singhal and Renu Singhal at Barmer, Rajasthan. He was admitted to his school by the name of Ronak Agrawal. He continued with the name of Ronak Agrawal till his 12th class. He passed his 10th class in the year 2011. He successfully qualified in his 12th class examination in the year 2013. He took admission in B.Tech (Civil) Course in SRM University, NCR Campus, Modi Nagar, Ghaziabad, UP under the same surname Ronak Agrawal. Agrawal was the name by which his community was known. The gotra of th...
Ramma Sahni vs.vijay Choudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~O-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:04. h September, 2017 CS(OS) 1062/2014, IA No.14931/2014, 6092/2017 RAMMA SAHNI Through : Mr.Pawash Piyush Mr.Sumeet, Advocates. ..... Plaintiff and % + versus VIJAY CHOUDHARY ..... Defendant Through : Mr.Amit Prakash Shahi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. Vide order dated 15.02.2017 the defendant was granted conditional leave to defend the suit on his deposit of a sum of `6,27,39,282/-, in the Court within a period of one month from 15.02.2017. Out of said amount `2.38Crore was to be released to the plaintiff to satisfy her claim towards principal amount.2. Defendant carried the above order in appeal bearing FAO (OS) No.153/2017 but it was also dismissed vide order dated 17.05.2017, thus entailing finality to the order dated 15.02.2017 of conditional leave to defend.3. Learned counsel for defendant submits that the defendant is unable to deposit the said amount. In the circumstances, pe...
Ram Singh vs.bharti Axa Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~12 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:4. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.647/2016 BHARTI AXA GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mohd. Mustafa, Adv. versus RAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. with respondent in person. + MAC APPEAL No.1073/2016 RAM SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. with versus appellant in person. BHARTI AXA GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mohd. Mustafa, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Ram Singh (first respondent in MAC Appeal No.647/2016 and appellant in cross appeal MAC Appeal No.1073/2016), statedly earning his livelihood as a cook, then aged about 49 years, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 28.12.2013 at MAC Appeal No.647/2016 & conn. Page 1 of 5 about 8.40 p.m. in front of Hotel Lalit, ahead of Sarai Toll Tax, Delhi Faridabad road due to negligent driving of truck trolla bearing registration No.HR38 5725, admittedly...
Vip Industries Limited vs.director General of Ordnance Services and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6390/2017 & C.M. APPL.26430/2017 Decided on:04. 09.2017 VIP INDUSTRIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Rajesh Pathak with Sh. Abhishek Chakraborty, Advocates. Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ORDNANCE SERVICES AND ANR.. Respondents Through : Sh. Rakesh Kumar with Sh. Vinod Kumar, Advocates, for UOI. Sh. Karan Luthra, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. + W.P.(C) 6480/2017, C.M. APPL.26822/2017 VIP INDUSTRIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Rajesh Pathak with Sh. Abhishek Chakraborty, Advocates. Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ORDNANCE SERVICES AND ANR. Respondents Through : Sh. Rakesh Kumar with Sh. Vinod Kumar, Advocates, for UOI. Sh. Karan Luthra, Advocate, for Respondent No.2. W.P.(C)6390/2017, 6480/2017 & CONT. CAS (C) 620/2017 Page 1 of 15 + CONT. CAS (C) 620/2017 VIP INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Rajesh Pathak with Sh. Abhishek Chakraborty, Advocates. Versus LT. GEN. GIRI RAJ SINGH AND ANR. Respondents Through...
Virender & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct, Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1559/2017 VIRENDER & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shanif Ahmed, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT, DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for the State with ASI Kuldeep Singh, PS Neb Sarai, Delhi. Mr.Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0409.2017 % The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.372/2016, registered on 30.04.2016 against them with Police Station Neb Sarai, South District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 is present. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO ASI Kuldeep Singh. The marri...
M/S Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ministry of Human Resources Develo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2017
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5829/2013 & CM128352013, 30174/2015 M/S PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LTD .....Petitioner Through Mr Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Mr Rohit Gandhi, Mr Shikhar Garg, Mr Ganesh Babu, Mr A.K. Rathore, Advocates. versus MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr Anumita Chandra, Mr Abhishek Ghai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Munish Mehra, Advocate for R3 and R4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0409.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter as PPL) is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (hereafter the Act). PPL has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning two separate notices (Office Memoranda) - both dated 31.05.2013 - whereby the petitioner was called upon to file a written statement in respect of the complaints filed by respondent nos. 3 and 4...
Next Generation Cable Communication & Anr vs.sanjhi Exim Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~7. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 49/2017 and CM APPL. 20807/2017 & C.M. No.7359/2017 NEXT GENERATION CABLE COMMUNICATION & ANR Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellants versus SANJHI EXIM PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Uppal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 17.01.2017, passed by ORDER0109.2017 the learned Single Judge, dismissing their application for condonation of delay of 47 days in re-filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellants had stated that aggrieved by an order dated 27.04.2017, passed in the present proceedings whereunder, to demonstrate their bonafides, the appellants were directed to deposit the principal amount, subject matter of the Award dated 21.03.2015, to the tune of Rs.1,40,2...
Sh. Ram Kala vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 09.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 320/2017 SH. RAM KALA ........ Petitioner versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.Anil Gera and Vimish Mittal, Advs. : Mr.Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) I.A.No.9701/2017 In view of the judgment of the Division Bench in DDA VS. DURGA CONSTRUCTION2013139) DRJ133(Del) (DB) and the averments made in the application, the delay in refiling is condoned. The application is disposed of O.M.P. (COMM) 320/2017 1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as O.M.P. (COMM) 320/2017 Page 1 of 10 the Act) impugns the award dated 16th February, 2017.2. By award dated 16th February, 2017 the Arbitrator has awarded as under:-"6.0 Summa...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.sandeep Kumar Swaroop and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.9413/2016 Pronounced on:1st September, 2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh, Mr. Sahaj Garg, Advocates. versus SANJAY KUMAR NAIK AND ORS. Through Mr. V.S. R. Krishna, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1473/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj and Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocates. Versus SANDEEP KUMAR SWAROOP AND ORS...Respondents Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N. Raja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR + % W.P. (C) Nos. 9413/2016 & 1473/2017 Page 1 of 46 SANJIV KHANNA, J.The question raised in the Writ Petition No.9413/2016 and Writ Petition No.1473/2017 is whether the respondents (except Sandeep Kumar Swaroop), who are working as Assistant Hydrogeologists, a Group B post in the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB for short), a...
M/S Englife Product (India) vs.lieutenanat Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~24 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7709/2017 Date of Decision:1. t September, 2017 M/S ENGLIFE PRODUCT (INDIA) ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr.Satender Singh, Advocate LIEUTENANAT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS Through: Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned award dated 17.8.2015 in LIR No.249/2014 of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts Complex and also the consequential impugned order dated 10.03.2016 in M No.-112of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court XIX.2. Vide the award dated 17.8.2015 referred to herein above, the reference made by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Government of NCT of Delhi vide reference No.F.24(23)/Lab./NE/2014/660 dated W.P.(C) No.7709/2017 Page 1 of 7 09.04.2014 to the effect: Whether services of Sh. Gyan Singh S/o Sh. Kishan Lal have been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the management and if so, to what relief i...
- ‹ Prev
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 100
- 101
- 102
- Next ›
- Last »