Skip to content

Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 06 2017

Vijay Sharma vs.namita Aggarawal

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h September, 2017 RC.REV. No.422/2017 & CM No.32441/2017 (for stay). VIJAY SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Ahuja with Ms. Amita Sachdeva, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: None. NAMITA AGGARAWAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 26th April, 2017 in E.No.1(New No.199/17) of the Pilot Court (Central), Tis Hazari Courts) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner / tenant for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent / landlady and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner / tenant from Shop No.2262, Shankar Gali, Bazar Sita Ram, Delhi 110 006.2. The counsel for the petitioner / tenant has been heard and the copies of the Trial Court record filed along with the paper book perused.3. The responden...


Sep 06 2017

Manju Sharma & Anr. Vs.jyoti Sharma & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~R-161 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 39/2010 and CM APPL.1563/2010 .....Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Nemo. MANJU SHARMA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) JYOTI SHARMA & ORS Through: Nemo.1. Shyam Sunder Sharma, 47 years, working as computer operator in State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 04.03.2005 due to negligent driving of Maruti Wagon-R car bearing registration No.DL-3CT-4706, admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the third respondent (insurer) and died in the consequence on 10.03.2005. The appellants, being his wife and son, instituted accident claim case (MACT Claim Petition No.128/2008) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on 15.11.2008 seeking compensation. The tribunal, after inquiry, by judgment dated 01.07.2009, upheld the claim for compensation on the principle o...


Sep 06 2017

Arun Sharma vs.indian Oil Corporation & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 06, 2017 + LPA5812017& C.Ms. 32229-30/2017 ARUN SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.P. Khurana, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ishann Verma, Advocate Versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manjula Gandhi, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellants grievance is that the learned Single Judge had rejected his claim for direction to the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) to implement its directive for employing him in one of its joint venture companies on a regular basis in letter and in spirit. The appellant was employed under the prevailing sports quota in the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC). He was at the relevant time, a Cricketer. His services were terminated in 2002. It was asserted in a letter that he had relied upon a certificate that was not genuine. On 16th February, 2004, pursuant ...


Sep 06 2017

Dinesh Kumar Himatsingka & Anr. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7242/2017 & C.M. No.30005/2017 (for stay) DINESH KUMAR HIMATSINGKA & ANR. Through: Mr R. Jawahar Lal, Mr Siddharth Bawa & Mr Shyamal Anand, Advocates. ........ Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: Mr Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD with Mr Rhishabh Jetley, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0609.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner No.1 is stated to be the owner and in possession of the property bearing Plot No.A-23, Village Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi situated in Khasra Nos. 710 (4-16) and 711 min (3-07) admeasuring an area of 8 bigha 3 biswa (1.69 acre) (hereinafter the Property).2. It is stated that the property was the subject of acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereafter 'the 1894 Act'). The 1894 Act was repealed by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereafter 'the 2013 Act')....


Sep 06 2017

Jai Bhagwan vs.state (Govt Nct of Delhi) & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~28 & 29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2079/2017 JAI BHAGWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) &ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocate along with ACP Dharam Pal, DIU, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. + 1.2. W.P.(CRL) 2080/2017 JAI BHAGWAN Through: Mr.Sanoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocate along with ACP Dharam Pal, DIU, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER % 06.09.2017 Status reports have been filed. Respondent No.2 Mr.Vinod Kumar Sharma in W.P. (CRL.) W.P. (CRL). No.2079/2017 & W.P. (CRL) 2080/2017 Page 1 of 3 No.2079/2017 and the respondent No.2 Mr. Surender Kumar in the W.P. (CRL.) No.2080/2017 appear i...


Sep 06 2017

New India Assurance Company Limited vs.sonu & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~R-164 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 66/2010 and CM APPL.2170/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate .....Appellant versus SONU & ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent (claimant) suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 11.05.2006 at about 11:30 a.m. due to negligent driving of canter bearing registration No.HR-63A- 1256, which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer). The injuries resulted in loss of three fingers of the left hand rendering him permanently disabled. The tribunal, by judgment dated 01.10.2009, assessed the functional disability to the extent of twenty per cent (20%) and has granted award accordingly, it inclusive of the loss of earning capacity, fastening the liability on the appellant insurer, though also granting it...


Sep 06 2017

Oriental Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.inaam Singh & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~R-166 & 167 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.69/2010 INAAM SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus UPSRTC & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.B. Shami, Adv. for R-2. + MAC APPEAL No.114/2010 ORIENTAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.B. Shami, Adv. versus INAAM SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Inaam Singh, appellant in MAC Appeal No.69/2010, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 18.11.2004 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.UP81 9644, admittedly insured against third party risk with Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (appellant in MAC appeal No.114/2010). He instituted accident claim case (suit No.308/2005) on 15.07.2005 MAC Appeal No.69/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 3 seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him which included fractured ribs, he having be...


Sep 06 2017

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 vs.m/s. Times Internet Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 09.2017 ITA7242017 & CM No.31490/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus M/S. TIMES INTERNET LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advs. ITA7162017 & CM No.31474/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus M/S. TIMES INTERNET LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advs. ITA7532017 & CM No.32407/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus M/S. TIMES INTERNET LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % ITA Nos.724/2017, 716/2017 & 753/2017 Page 1 of 5 1. These appeals...


Sep 06 2017

Subodh Jain vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~4 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.6827/2016 Date of decision :6. h September, 2017 SUBODH JAIN Through : Mr. Keshav Mohan, Mr. Rishi ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus Awasthi and Ms. Anindita Barman, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Standing Counsel for UOI. Mr. Digvijay Rai, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Mr. Yash Srivastava and Mr. Pratap Singh, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenakshi Chatterjee and Mr. Akshay Sahni, Advs. for R-4. Ms. Eshita Baruah, Adv. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for CAG/R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition seeks issuance of mandamus to the Government of India directing the Comptroller and Auditor General of W.P.(C)No.6827/2016 Page 1 of 2 accounts for conducting a proper and meaningful audit of the accounts of Del...


Sep 06 2017

Jai Bhagwan vs.state (Govt Nct of Delhi) &Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2017

$~28 & 29 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2079/2017 JAI BHAGWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) &ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocate along with ACP Dharam Pal, DIU, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. + 1.2. W.P.(CRL) 2080/2017 JAI BHAGWAN Through: Mr.Sanoj Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with Mr.Bhagat Singh, Advocate along with ACP Dharam Pal, DIU, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER % 06.09.2017 Status reports have been filed. Respondent No.2 Mr.Vinod Kumar Sharma in W.P. (CRL.) W.P. (CRL). No.2079/2017 & W.P. (CRL) 2080/2017 Page 1 of 3 No.2079/2017 and the respondent No.2 Mr. Surender Kumar in the W.P. (CRL.) No.2080/2017 appear i...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial