Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Company Limited vs.geeta Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~R-168 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 71/2010 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INS. COMPANY LIMITED .....Appellant versus Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA GEETA SHARMA & ORS JUDGMENT (ORAL) Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. On the claim petition (suit No.959/2007) which was instituted on 18.10.2005 by the first respondent to seek compensation for the death of her 12 years old son Gautam in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 25.12.2004 at about 9:45 p.m. due to negligent driving of Wagon R car bearing registration No.DL6H9510 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company, the tribunal, after inquiry, by judgment dated 11.12.2009, granted compensation in the total sum of Rs. 6,48,000/- and directed the insurer to pay with interest. The tribunal referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in R.K. Malik & Anr. Vs. Kiran Pal & Ors. 2009 ACJ1924in computing the compensation awarded...
Vinod Kumar Panwar vs.registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7553/2017 & CM No.31149/2017 1. VINOD KUMAR PANWAR ........ Petitioner REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ANR Through: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, ASC along for with Mr. Rizwan, Advocate R-1/RCS. Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The relief prayed for in the present petition is for issuing directions to ORDER0709.2017 the respondent No.1/RCS to decide and dispose of the representations dated 13.07.2017 and 21.08.2017 submitted by the petitioner requesting inter alia that the decision taken for conducting the bye-elections for only 4 posts that have fallen vacant in the Managing Committee of the respondent No.2/Society be reconsidered and instead, a fresh election be conducted for the entire Managing Committee comprising of 15 members.2. Respondent No.2/Society has filed an affidavit throug...
Rohit Mahajan vs.rajiv Bhardwaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h September, 2017. CM(M) 978/2017 ROHIT MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Versus Through: None. RAJIV BHARDWAJ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.32533/2017 (for exemption) ..... Respondent 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 978/2017 & CM No.32534/2017 (for stay) 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 14th July, 2017 in Civil Suit No.17583/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-03 (ADJ), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner / defendant under Order VII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the CPC.4. 5. The counsel for the petitioner has been heard. The respondent / plaintiff instituted the suit from which this petition arises, for division / separation and recovery of physical possession of half undivided portion of second floor of prope...
Deepak Mittal & Anr vs.geeta Sharma & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h September, 2017. CM(M) 971/2017 & CM No.32438/2017 (for stay) DEEPAK MITTAL& ANR Through: Ms. Neha Garg, Adv. ........ Petitioners GEETA SHARMA & ORS Through: None. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS CM(M) 975/2017 & CM No.32454/2017 (for stay) AND SANTOSH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Neha Garg, Adv. Versus Through: None. KRISHAN KANT SHARMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondent CM No.32544/2017 in CM(M) 971/2017 & CM No.32455/2017 in CM(M) 975/2017 (both for exemptions) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) 971/2017 & CM(M) 975/2017 3. These petitions, both under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugn identical orders [both dated 16th August, 2017 in Arbitration No.23/2017 & Arbitration No.24/2017 of the Court of Additional District CM(M) Nos.971/2017 & 975/2017 Page 1 of 6 Judge-07 (ADJ) (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. though i...
Angoori Devi & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~30 * + % 1.2. 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2101/2017 ANGOORI DEVI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rohit Minocha, Advocate with Mr.Chaitanya Sahoo, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashish Negi, Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State with SI Nipendra Kumar, PS Madhu Vihar, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0609.2017 Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 is present. She is duly identified by the IO SI Nipendra Kumar. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.124/2017, registered against them on 20.04.2017 with Police Station Madhu Vihar, East District, Delhi 420/406/467/468/ 471/120B/5IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. Sections under W.P. (C...
Ganesh vs.farjanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~R-163 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 64/2010 GANESH FARJANDA Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate .....Appellant versus Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for ..... Respondent R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then stated to be aged about 35 years old, serving as Head Constable with Delhi Police, while on duty of checking vehicles near R.R. Hospital, close to Dhaula Kuan, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 13.06.2008 at about 9:45 p.m., statedly due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.HR-55H-2066, which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer). He suffered amputation of both lower limbs and, as per the disability certificate (Ex.PW-1/2), the board of doctors of Hindu Rao Hospital certified him to be permanently disabled, the disability being one hundred per cent (100%). He instituted accident claim c...
Vidya Pandey vs.mohd. Noor Hassan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.794/2016 & CM Nos. 36535-36/2016 VIDYA PANDEY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. versus MOHD. NOOR HASSAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. N.K. Jha, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Pankaj Seth & Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advs. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 11.09.2011, Mohd. Kalam was travelling in a motor vehicle described as Gramin Sewa bearing registration No.DL2 0479 (described in the proceedings as offending vehicle) when it met with an accident at about 10.45 a.m. resulting in he falling off on the road sustaining head injuries which resulted in his death. A criminal case vide first information report 224/2011 for offences under Sections 279/304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) was registered by police station Begumpur in this regard on the statement of constable Vijay Chaudhary who was present at the scene on beat duty. The first and second respo...
Om Bati vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1596/2017 Date of decision:6th September, 2017 OM BATI ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Randhir Singh Kalkal, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC along with Mr.Swaran Singh Chib, AC- CISF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The petitioner, Om Bati, claims to be legally wedded wife of Constable Inderjit Singh. She has filed the present writ petition for release of family pension to her.2. Constable Inderjit Singh is missing since 23.06.2011 and FIR No.180/2012, P.S. Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan, under Section 365 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered on 10.05.2012. WP(C) 1596/2017 Page 1 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that as per the documents/form filled up by Constable Inderjit Singh on 28.10.2010, he was unmarried. Constable Inderjit Singh had declared and nominated his mother Atra De...
Crime Investigation Detective Trust vs.delhi Development Authority and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.6728/2016 Date of decision :6. h September, 2017 CRIME INVESTIGATION DETECTIVE TRUST ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Krishna K. Singh, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advs. for DDA. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for SDMC/R-2 with Mr. Anil Verma, Head Clerk, SDMC. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for R-3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The petitioner had complained that illegal parking in and around Jasola District and the road along TDI centre had developed which is run and controlled by parking mafia. In this regard, our attention is W.P.(C)No.6728/2016 Page 1 of 3 drawn to the counter affidavit filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation setting out the details of authorized parking sites under their control. The SDMC has disclosed existence of authorized...
Satnam Singh & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1586/2017 & Crl.M.A. 8848/2017 (stay) SATNAM SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Manoj Kumar Advocate along with petitioners in person. Sharma, versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, ASC for State with SI Jyoti, PS Rajouri Garden, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person along with her father. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0609.2017 Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 is present along with her father. She is duly identified by the IO SI Jyoti. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.1284/2015, registered against them on 01.09.2015 with Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi under Sections 498A/4IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother petitioner no.1 an...
- ‹ Prev
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- Next ›
- Last »