Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.daya Nand & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 929/2016 and CM413862016 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi and Ms. Komal Dhingra, Advocates versus DAYA NAND & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar and Mr.S.H. Khan, Advocates for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 21.04.2009 in the area of Janakpuri, New Delhi due to the negligent driving of Wagon-R car bearing registration no.DL-8CU-0034, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant / insurance company (insurer) for the period in question. On his claim petition (petition no.77329/2016), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), after inquiry, by judgment dated 27.08.2016, awarded compensation in the total amount of Rs.21,52,719/-, directing the insurance company to pay the same with interest at the rate of n...
Grasim Industries Limited vs.competition Commission of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7842/2017 GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Gopal Subramanium, Senior Advocate with Ms Nisha Kaur Uberoi, Ms Soumya Kariharan, Ms Dinoo Muthappa, Ms Shravani Shekhar, Mr Saksham Dhingra, Mr Ankur Kashyap and Mr Vivek Kaja, Advocates. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr Samar Bansal and Ms Shreya ........ RESPONDENTS Singh, Advocates for CCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0609.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM APPL. 32346/2017 1.2. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7842/2017 and CM Nos. 32345/2017 & 32347/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning three separate orders passed by Competition Commission of India (hereafter as CCI). The first order impugned in the present petition was passed on 10.11.2016, under Section 26 (1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter as the Act). By the ...
Rajendra Sharma vs.tinku
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO No.163/2016 & CM Appl. No.13773/2016 6th September, 2017 RAJENDRA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate with appellant in person. TINKU versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 impugns the judgment of the Employees Compensation Commissioner dated 22.02.2016 by which the Employees Compensation Commissioner has allowed the claim petition filed by the respondent/claimant and awarded an amount of Rs.1,97,459/- along with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the accident being 07.02.2009.2. The facts of the case pleaded by the respondent/claimant before the Employees Compensation Commissioner were that he was FAO No.163/2016 Page 1 of 7 working with the appellant at the appellants toy factory since one year prior to the date of accident on 07.02...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.santosh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 668/2016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy & Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advs. versus SANTOSH KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.D. Joshi, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 06.05.2016 of the motor accident claims tribunal on claim petition (suit No.88/2015) of the first respondent (claimant), while awarding compensation in his favour for injuries suffered in the motor vehicular accident that occurred on 06.01.2015, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Tata Tipper bearing registration No.DL1R2224 concededly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company, its plea for exoneration on the ground that the driver (second respondent) was not holding a valid or effective driving licence was rejected. It is the contention of the insurance company that since the m...
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.devender Prasad & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~R-159 & 160 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:06. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 38/2010 & CM15152010 (for additional evidence) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate versus DEVENDER PRASAD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None + MAC.APP.219/2010 & CM64102010(for additional evidence) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate versus DEVENDER PRASAD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 06.03.2007, Devender Prasad (first respondent in both these appeals) was moving in a car bearing registration no.DL-3CA-5454 (car), his wife Ratna Prasad travelling with him. The car came to be involved in a collision with a motor vehicle described as Tata 207 bearing registration no.DL-1LE-9881 (the offending vehicle) at about 11.45 a.m.. As a result of the collision both Devender Prasad and Ratna Prasad suffered injuries, the latter dyin...
Shri Pawan Chand vs.rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~R-169 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:6. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.75/2010 SHRI PAWAN CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. versus Rajesh Gupta, Advs. RAKESH KUMAR @ RAKESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 06.11.2009, which is impugned by the appeal at hand, on the claim petition (petition no.119/2008) of the first respondent, while awarding compensation in his favour for the injuries suffered by him in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 06.12.2007, due to negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DNN0006 admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer), it (third respondent) being called upon to pay was granted recovery rights against the appellant, he being the registered owner of the offending vehicle on the basis of finding that the driving licence (R1W1/1) presented at the inquiry,...
Central Park Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs.keystone Realtors Pvt Ltd & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 179/2016 & CM223352016 Date of decision:6. h September, 2017 CENTRAL PARK ESTATES PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Amit Sibbal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Satinder Singh, Mr.Abhay Gupta, Mr.Ajay Kumar, Mr.Sushil Kumar, Advs. KEYSTONE REALTORS PVT LTD & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.C.M.Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Nancy Roy and Mr.Rupin Bahl, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The Central Park Estates Pvt. Ltd. and three associate companies have filed the present intra court appeal under Order XLIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code for shot) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 impugning order dated 9th May, 2016 disposing of application IA no.14098/2015 of the appellants under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 of the Code and the application IA No.22645/2015 of the respondents, who are the defendants, under Order XXXIX ...
Kanika Bansal vs.indiabulls Finance Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.364/2017 & CM Appls. 32530/2017, 32531/2017, 32532/2017 % KANIKA BANSAL6h September, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Rishabh Gulati, Adv. Through: versus INDIABULLS FINANCE SERVICES PVT. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the court below dated 11.04.2016 by which the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Act have been dismissed.2. The respondent no.1/claimant filed arbitration proceedings for recovery of loan granted to the appellant and the FAO No.364/2017 Page 1 of 6 respondent no.3 herein. Appellant and the respondent no.3 were granted a loan of Rs.15 lacs on 29.09.2007 repayable in 36 equated monthly installments of Rs.56,513/-. Since the loan was ...
Yogendra Saraswat vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
$~26. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7880/2017 and CM APPL. 32563/2017 1. YOGENDRA SARASWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate with Mr. Rohan Sharma and Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Dipak K. Nag, Advocate with Mr. Apurva Upmanyu, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, assailing an ORDER0609.2017 Office Memorandum dated 29.08.2017, issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Government of India, stating that the show cause notice dated 15.06.2017 issued to the Board of Directors, Kendriya Bhandar stands discharged.2. We may note at the outset that this is the second round of litigation that has been initiated by the petitioner, who describes himself as a member of the resp...
Hc Subey Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7410/2016 Reserved on:18. h August,2017 Date of decision :6. h September,2017 HC SUBEY SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Siddharth, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through Ms.Sangita Rai, SCGC with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Pradeep Tomar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.The petitioner has challenged before us the order dated 21.12.2011 passed by the respondent No.3, Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), imposing a punishment of reduction of pay (pay scale 5200-20200) by three stages from Rs.10,260/- + 2800/-(G.Pay) to Rs.9150/- + 2800/- (G.Pay) in the time scale for a WP(C) 7410/2016 Page 1 period of three years with immediate effect. It was further ordered that the petitioner would not earn any increment during the period of reduction and that on expiry of this period, the reduction would have the effect of postponing his future increment of pay...
- ‹ Prev
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- Next ›
- Last »