Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.dilraj Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~15 to 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 540/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus DILRAJ KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 to 5 + MAC.APP. 58/2016 DILRAJ KAUR & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus RELIANCE GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 984/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus NEELAM KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC A Nos. 540/15, 58/16, 984/15, 53/16, 10& 6Page 1 of 10 Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 & 2 + MAC.APP. 53/2016 NEELAM KAUR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus SATISH KUMAR YADAV & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amol N. Suryavanshi, Adv for R-3 /insurance company + MAC.APP. 1029/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ........
National Highways Authority of India vs.gwalior Bypass Project Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 09.2017 ARB.A.(COMM.) 26/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Appellant versus GWALIOR BYPASS PROJECT LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Ramesh Kumar and Mr Siddharth Pandey : Mr Nilava Bandyopadhyay CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0709.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA No.10315/ 2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB. A. (COMM.) 26/2017 & IA No.10320/2017(stay) 1. The Appellant, by this Appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), impugns the order dated 09.06.2017 passed by two Members of the Arbitral Tribunal in the application filed by the respondent under Section 17 of the Act. ARB.A.(COMM) 26/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. By the impugned order dated 09.06.2017, the Arbitral Tribunal has restrained the appellant from taking any co...
Cpio Cbi vs.cj Karira
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7439/2012 CPIO CBI CJ KARIRA Through: Mr Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for ........ Petitioner CBI. versus Through: Respondent in person. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0709.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter 'CIC') whereby CIC had directed the petitioner to provide the information as sought by the petitioner.2. It is the case of the petitioner that Central Bureau of Investigation (hereafter 'CBI') is included in the second schedule to the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter 'the Act') and, by virtue of section 24(1) of the Act, is exempt from the purview of the Act.3. The respondent disputes the above contention and claims that, by virtue of the proviso to section 24(1) of the Act, the information sought by him is not exempt from disclosure. The petitioner controverts the...
Deepanshu Arora vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) &Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1070/2017 DEEPANSHU ARORA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Nitin Ahlawat, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) &ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI Narender, PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi. Mr.Ashish Ruhella, Advocate with Mr.Rohit Tyagi, Advocate for R-2 to R-6 along with respondent No.2 to 6 in person. % 1.2. 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0709.2017 Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 to 6 are present. They are being represented by their counsel. They are duly identified by the IO SI Narender. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.1627/2015, registered W.P. (Crl.) 1070/2017 Page 1 of 3 is submitted that against...
State vs.tammane
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.L.P. 566/2016 Date of Judgment:7. h September, 2017 STATE Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State alongwith SI Ramesh Chand, PS Nabi Karim ..... Appellant versus TAMMANE CORAM: Through : Mr.Rajat Srivastava, Advocate ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 16575/2016 (Condonation of Delay) 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner/State seeking condonation of 119 days delay in filing the present leave petition. This application is vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent. It is contended that the delay is unexplained and it is not on account of any bona fide reasons.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that after the order was pronounced on 29.02.2016, the complete file was prepared and forwarded to APP Delhi for his opinion. Thereafter, the file was forwarded to the Chief Prosecutor on 18.03.2016. Ther...
Amit Kumar & Ors vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~42 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2590/2017 AMIT KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar Verma, Advocate with Mr.Pawan Bedi, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with SI Omveer Singh, PS Nand Nagri, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0809.2017 Crl.M.A. 14846/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2590/2017 1.2. 3. Notice. Learned ASC, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She appears in person and accepts the notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Omveer Singh. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of W.P...
Goverdhan Dass Bansal & Anr vs.dinesh Kumar Rathi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h September, 2017 CM(M) 765/2011 & CMs No.12354/2011 (for stay) & 9743/2013 (of respondent u/S151CPC) PUSHPA RATHI & ANR Through: Mr. M.L. Bhargava, Adv. ........ Petitioners JUGNU BANSAL Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kuber Boddh and Ms. Ashima Mandla, Advs. AND CM(M) 1098/2011, CM No.16986/2017 (u/O XXII R-4 CPC) & CM No.16987/2017 (for condonation of 15 days delay in filing CM No.16986/2017) GOVERDHAN DASS BANSAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kuber Boddh & Ms. Ashima Mandal, Advs. DINESH KUMAR RATHI & ANR Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.L. Bhargava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM (M) No.765/2011 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment [dated 5th March, 2011 in RCA No.35/2008 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-03, (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]. allowing the appeal preferred by the respondent/plaintif...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.usha Rani & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~12 to 14 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 424/2015 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. C.K.Gola, Advocate versus USHA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Adv. for R-1. + MAC.APP. 454/2015 and CM APPL.5256/2016 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Adv. ..... Appellant versus USHA RANI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Adv. for R-1. Mr. C.K.Gola, Advocate for R-4. + MAC.APP. 455/2015 and CM APPL.5255/2016 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Adv. ..... Appellant versus SUBHASH CHANDER ALLAHBAD & ORS MAC Appeal No.424/2015 etc. Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Adv. for R-1. Mr. C.K.Gola, Advocate for R-4. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 21.01.2009 Subh...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.neelam Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~15 to 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 540/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus DILRAJ KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 to 5 + MAC.APP. 58/2016 DILRAJ KAUR & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus RELIANCE GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 984/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus NEELAM KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC A Nos. 540/15, 58/16, 984/15, 53/16, 10& 6Page 1 of 10 Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 & 2 + MAC.APP. 53/2016 NEELAM KAUR & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus SATISH KUMAR YADAV & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amol N. Suryavanshi, Adv for R-3 /insurance company + MAC.APP. 1029/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ........
Metis Eduventures Private Limited vs.k.d Campus Private Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~27 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 167/2017 Date of decision:7. hSeptember, 2017 METIS EDUVENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant Through: Mr. AmitSibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mani Gupta, Mr. Rajat Kumar, Mr. Sashidhar S, Ms. AishwaryaWabh, Mr. Aditya Gupta & Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocates versus K.D CAMPUS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. C M ChanderLall, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rajeshwari& Mr. Tahir Advocates FAO(OS) (COMM) 168/2017 NEERAJ KUKREJA &ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. SanjeevSeshadri, Ms. AakashiLodha, Mr. VaibhavSrivastava& Mr. Harsh Parashar, Advocates versus K D CAMPUS PRIVATE LIMITED &ORS....... RESPONDENTS FAO(OS)(COMM) Nos. 167/2017& 168/2017 Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. C M ChanderLall, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Rajeshwari& Mr. Tahir, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Intra Court Appeal,FAO (OS)(COMM...
- ‹ Prev
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- Next ›
- Last »