Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nafees Ahmed vs.lieutenant Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:07. h September, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.5612/2017 NAFEES AHMED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.S.N.Gupta, Adv. versus LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Pankaj Sinha, Adv. with Ms.Jubli Mamolia & Mr.K.K.Mishra, Advs. for R-1, 2, 6 & 7. Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel, SDMC with Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Adv. for R-4 & 5/SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents not to disturb the operation of chef-cart of the petitioner at the site, i.e. opposite Gaushala, near Maternity Hospital, Najafgarh Road, Delhi, up till 31.03.2019, i.e. the date upto which the licence fee has been paid, and also for release of the chef-cart and the goods of the petitioner which are in illegal custody of...
Sky View Counsultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.income Tax Officer, Ward 23 (4) & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) No.10507/2016 SKY VIEW COUNSULTANTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr.Somil Agarwal, Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Ms.Monika Ghai, Ms. Syamalima, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD23(4) & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER0709.2017 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the notice dated 29th March 2016 issued by the Income Tax Officer Ward 23(4), New Delhi (hereafter Assessing Officer - AO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) seeking to reopen the... Petitioner's assessment for the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. A challenge is also laid to the letter dated 4th July 2016 rejecting the objections filed by the... Petitioner to the reopening of the assessment.2. The facts in brief are that the... Petitioner, Sky View Consultants P...
Pawan Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 1607/2017 HARI NANDAN & ORS Through: Mr. S.A. Rajput, Advocate with petitioners in person. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Piyush Singhal, Advocate with ASI Asmita, P.S. Najafgarh, Delhi Mr. M.K. Perwej for Mr. Taimoor Ali, Advocate for R-2 to R-5 along with respondents No.2 to 5 in person. Respondent No.6 in person. + W.P. (CRL.) 1610/2017 PAWAN KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K. Perwej, proxy for Mr. Taimoor Ali, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Piyush Singhal, Advocate with ASI Asmita, P.S. Najafgarh, Delhi Mr. S.A. Rajput, Advocate for respondents along with R-2 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL W.P. (CRL). No.1607 /2017 & W.P. (CRL) 1610/2017 Page 1 of 3 % ORDER0709.2017 Status report has been filed. In ...
Bridge & Roof Co. (India) Ltd. Vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprasth Univer ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~OS-31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07. 09.2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 296/2017 BRIDGE & ROOF CO. (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.M.K.Ghosh and Ms.Tina Garg, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTH UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Mukul Talwar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhay Chattopadhyay, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This petition is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to impugn the order/Award passed by the learned Arbitrator on 17.4.2017 terminating the proceedings on account of the failure of the petitioner in filing the Statement of Claim within the period stated by the learned Arbitrator.2. Some of the relevant facts are that on 1.11.2006 the Work of Construction and Development of GGSIPU Campus at Sector 16-C Dwarka of the respondent was awarded to petitioner vide Letter of Intent No.GGSIPU/UWD/2006/293-III/3236 dated 01.11.2006. On 20.11.2011 co...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.k.n. Bhatt & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~R-171 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:07. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL832010 and CM Nos.2634/2010 and 2635/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate versus K.N. BHATT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Rajender, bachelor son of the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), was driving a motor vehicle described as one bearing registration no.HR-38GT-7686 on 15.08.2004 when he lost control over it due to the tyre getting deflated, the vehicle ending up in the fields on roadside and as a result of the injuries suffered, he died. The accident claim case (suit no.76/2009) instituted on 22.01.2009, invoking Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,resulted in judgment dated 13.08.2009 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) whereby award of Rs.3,32,000/- has been granted, the liability having been fastened on the appellant / insur...
Bharti Axa Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.ram Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.775/2016 BHARTI AXA GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Kumar, Adv. versus RAM SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Srivastava, Adv. for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The judgment impugned by the appeal at hand was passed by the motor accident claims Tribunal on 09.02.2016 on the accident claim petition (case No.77/2012) instituted by first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) since Kallu @ Kallu Ram statedly died in motor vehicular accident that took place on the night intervening 20th and 21st November, 2011 allegedly due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Mahindra and Mahindra Tractor/Water tanker bearing registration No.DL1 1980, which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer).2. The insurer on which the liability to pay compensation det...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.mohd Shakeel & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 213/2017 & CM No.9046/2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Adv. Versus MOHD SHAKEEL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tiwari, proxy for Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Mohd. Aziz, 22 years old, a bachelor, died in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 25.10.2011 due to negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DL7CB6313 concededly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company. Accident claim case (MACT2282012, new No.14768/2015) was instituted by his parents and siblings, they being first to seventh respondents (collectively, the claimants) on 02.07.2012, seeking compensation. The Tribunal, after inquiry, by judgment dated 23.11.2016, has awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 12,13,272/-, this inclusive of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards loss of love & affection, ...
Tops Detective & Security Services Ltd vs.employees Provident Fund Org ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :07. h September, 2017 W.P.(C) 8078/2016, CM APPL. 33484/2016 TOPS DETECTIVE & SECURITY SERVICES LTD......... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajiv Shukla, Mr. Davinder Grover, Mr. Souvik Mukherjee, Advs. Versus EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. 2. Arguments addressed on behalf of either side. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 30.05.2016 of the Presiding Officer, EPFAT in ATA No.882(9)2011 whereby the appeal was dismissed in view of the non compliance of the directions of pre-deposit, which were directed vide order dated 02.01.2012 in the said appeal. W.P.(C) 8078/2016 Page 1 of 8 3. Vide a prior order dated 02.01.2012 of the EPFAT in the same appeal ATA No.882(9)2011, it had also been directed to the effect that no prima facie case had been made out for...
Rahee Infratech Limited vs.indiabulls Constructions Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 09.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 115/2017 RAHEE INFRATECH LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus INDIABULLS CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED ..... Respondent : Mr. Arjun Singh Bawa and Ms. Vishakha Gupta, Advs. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Ms. Prachi V. Sharma, Adv. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 115/2017 & I.A. 10267/2017(under Order 23 rule 3 CPC) 1. This is an application under Order 23 Rule 3 filed by the parties. It is contended that the disputes between the parties have been settled and a compromise deed dated 30.08.2017 has been executed between the parties.2. The respondent had issued a Tender Notice dated 12.02.2012, inviting bids for completion of Civil and Structural Works of Dhama O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 115/2017 Page 1 of 3 River Bridge and Godavari River Crossing for Country Pipeline for 1350 MW Thermal P...
Dinesh Bhandari & Ors vs.state of Nct Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~17 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1284/2017 DINESH BHANDARI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Aditya Tripathi, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate along with IO ASI Rajpal Singh, PS Madhu Vihar, Delhi. Ms.Samta Jain, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0709.2017 Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 is present. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by the IO ASI Rajpal Singh. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.1049/2014, registered against them on 16.09.2014 with Police Station Madhu Vihar, East District, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/5IPC on ...
- ‹ Prev
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- Next ›
- Last »