Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surender Singh vs.anand Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2017
$~R-174 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.90/2010 SURENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: None. versus ANAND KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appeal at hand is by the registered owner of the vehicle, bus bearing registration No.DL1A0872 the negligent driving of which statedly resulted in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 20.01.1998, causing injuries to the first respondent (claimant) giving rise to cause of action to institute accident claim case (suit No.531/2007), which was decided eventually by the motor accident claims tribunal, by judgment dated 06.11.2009. The appellant was a party to the said claim proceedings and had due notice he even participating by examining himself as a witness. The tribunal while awarding compensation in favour of the first respondent returned a finding that there was breach of terms and co...
Rizwana & Ors. Vs.mehraj & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2017
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.810/2017 and CM APPL.32793/2017 RIZWANA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate versus MEHRAJ & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for R-4. Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants described themselves as residents of house No.J- 211-B/119, Karawal Nagar, Delhi and had instituted accident claim case (MACT No.278/12) seeking compensation on account of death of Raashid in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred within the area of Police Station Masuree, (UP) on 10.07.2012 involving two motor vehicles, one described as dumper bearing registration No.UP- 14BT-4661 and the other car bearing registration No.UP-14BE-1338, which were statedly insured against third party risk with the fourth and fifth respondents for the period in question.2. It appears that the tribunal deemed it ne...
Urmila Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h September, 2017 TEST. CAS. 53/2010 URMILA SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Joydeep Sarma, STATE & ORS. Advocate versus Represented by: None. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioners seek grant of probate/Letters of Administration in favour of either of the petitioners on the basis of the last and final Will of Late Shri Jagmohan Lal dated 3rd June, 2002 to administer the property bearing No.I-F/161, Lajpat Nagar-I, New Delhi- 110024.2. Briefly stated, the deceased, Shri Jagmohan Lal, died on 5th July, 2007 and the death certificate issued by Government of NCT is placed on record as Ex. PW-1/1. Upon his death, the deceased left the following class I heirs namely Mrs. Urmila Sharma (petitioner no.1), Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma (petitioner no.2), Mr. Suminder Kumar Sharma (petitioner no.3), Mrs. Raj Sharma (respondent no.2) and...
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs.ram Naresh Upadhyay & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2017
$~R-179 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:8. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.99/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate versus RAM NARESH UPADHYAY & ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Pradeep Upadhyay died due to injuries suffered in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.08.2006 while riding on a motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-5SU-4305. His parents, first and second respondents (claimants), instituted accident claim case (MACT No.153/09/06) seeking compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, impleading owner of the said motorcycle and its insurer, the latter being now appellant, questioning the propriety of the award by judgment dated 02.12.2009, whereby it has been called upon to pay compensation, its plea being that it was not liable to indemnify, since the deceased cannot be treated as third party having been repelle...
Kumari Bandna and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2017
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.519/2017 Date of decision:8. h September, 2017 KUMARI BANDNA AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Farman Ali & Mr. Nitish Gupta, Advocates for Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Pursuant to an advertisement published in the Employment News in the month of September, 2015, Kumari Bandna and Anjum Jahan Sheikh had applied for selection and appointment against two vacancies of Head Constable (Midwife) in Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP). Cut-off date for submission of the application was 30th October, 2015. Written examination was held on 2nd December, 2015 and the results were declared on 3rd December, 2015. The viva-voce was conducted on 3rd December, 2015 and final results were declared. Kumari Bandna was declared selected in the Gene...
Avinash Kumar vs.commissioner of Police & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11043/2016 Reserved on:25. h August, 2017 % NITIN KUMAR Date of Decision:8. h September, 2017 ....Petitioner Through Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & OTHERS ..Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11044/2016 AVINASH KUMAR ....Petitioner Through Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & OTHERS ..Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11045/2016 ASHISH KUMAR ....Petitioner Through Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate. Versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & OTHERS ..Respondents Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD. W.P.(C)No.11043/2016+connected matters Page 1 of 25 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The three aforestated writ petitions impugn the order dated 16th July, 2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (...
Pnb Housing Finance Limited vs.simply Computers Tech & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 09.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 249/2017 PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED versus SIMPLY COMPUTERS TECH & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........... Petitioner ..Respondents For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ajay Uppal, Advocate. : None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0709.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The respondents have been served. None appears for the respondents.3. The petitioner is a finance company rendering financial/credit facilities in the form of loans. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 249/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents had approached the petitioner for seeking financial assistance for purchase of. Room No.1, 1A, 2A, First Floor, Habib Building, Gowalia Tank, Stephen Church Kemps Comer, Mumbai.5. A loan in the s...
Hari Nandan & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 1607/2017 HARI NANDAN & ORS Through: Mr. S.A. Rajput, Advocate with petitioners in person. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Piyush Singhal, Advocate with ASI Asmita, P.S. Najafgarh, Delhi Mr. M.K. Perwej for Mr. Taimoor Ali, Advocate for R-2 to R-5 along with respondents No.2 to 5 in person. Respondent No.6 in person. + W.P. (CRL.) 1610/2017 PAWAN KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.K. Perwej, proxy for Mr. Taimoor Ali, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State with Piyush Singhal, Advocate with ASI Asmita, P.S. Najafgarh, Delhi Mr. S.A. Rajput, Advocate for respondents along with R-2 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL W.P. (CRL). No.1607 /2017 & W.P. (CRL) 1610/2017 Page 1 of 3 % ORDER0709.2017 Status report has been filed. In ...
Uma Shanker Gupta & Anr vs.raj Kishore Manjhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~21 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:07th September, 2017 FAO5102016 & CM Nos.39518/2016, 39521/2016 UMA SHANKER GUPTA & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Gaurav Gaur, Mr.Anwar Ali Khan, Advocates. versus RAJ KISHORE MANJHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Akarsh Bhalla, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Narendra Gautam, Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocates for respondent no.2 along with respondent no.2 in person. Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate respondent no.3. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order dated 29th February, 2016 whereby compensation of Rs.1,86,854/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. On 17th January, 2015 at 04:00 A.M., respondent No.1 was driving Canter bearing No.DL-1LT-3297 when the said vehicle met with an accident at Bherod, Jaipur, Rajasthan which resulted grievous injuries to respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 was admitted in Kailash Hospital, FAO5102016 Page 1 of 5 Bherod, Jaipur. Th...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.ram Abhilakh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:7. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 671/2017 and CM APPL.27538/2017 (stay) UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate versus RAM ABHILAKH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar Mishra, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the claim case (MACT No.81/2014) instituted on 03.06.2014 by the first respondent, the Tribunal, by judgment dated 29.05.2017, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.3,56,900/-, fastening the liability on the appellant to pay, it being the owner of the vehicle which statedly had caused the accident.2. The appellant questions the above said award on the ground that the judgment of the Tribunal does not reveal the reasons impelling it to take the view it reached for determining the compensation under various heads, particularly on account of loss of income during treatment,...
- ‹ Prev
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- Next ›
- Last »