Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nhai vs.m/s. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) 116/2017 & CM No.14479/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Kapoor and Mr.Srikant Sharma, Advs. versus NHAI M/S. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD . Respondent Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. Lal, and with Ms.Niyati Ms.Aakash Lodha, Advs. Ms.Malavika Kohli CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT1109.2017 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.The present appeal is directed against judgment, dated 24th January 2017, of the learned Single Judge in OMP2602015, which had been preferred by the appellant, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenging Award, dated 29th November, 2014, as corrected on 15th December, 2014. FAO (OS) 116/2017 Page 1 of 48 The Facts:2. In 2004, bids were invited, by the appellant, for development of road connectivity to Paradip Port in Orissa. The respondent bid, and was awarded the contract, by the appellant,...
Shailender Singh and Ors vs.the Kangra Cooperative Bank Ltd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~15. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3722/2016 and CM APPL. 15863/2016 1. SHAILENDER SINGH AND ORS Through: Mr. Nimish Chib and Mr. Ajay Mishra, Advocates ........ Petitioners versus THE KANGRA COOPERATIVE BANK LTD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajendra Vats and Mr. Aditya, Advocates for R-1/Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER1109.2017 The petitioners are aggrieved by an order dated 04.02.2016 passed by the learned DRAT, dismissing an appeal filed by them against the orders dated 13.11.2015 and 13.01.2016 passed by the learned DRT.2. On 13.11.2015, the Securitisation Application filed by the petitioners was disposed of by the DRT in view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioners to the effect that his clients were ready to vacate the subject premises along with roof rights within 30 days, they were granted a period of 30 days to vacate the subject premises and hand over possession thereof ...
Vinod Popli vs.federal Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7958/2017, CM Nos. 32827-32828//2017 VINOD POPLI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul T.N., Advocate along with Mr. Sagar Pathak and Mr. Harsh Raghuvanshi, Advocates. versus FEDERAL BANK AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Joby P. Varghese, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER1109.2017 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an interim order dated 30.08.2017, passed by the learned DRAT in Misc. Appeal No.361/2017 filed by him against the order dated 15.07.2017, passed by the learned DRT II, Delhi which is a consent order, recording the consent of the respondent No.1/Bank, respondent Nos. 3 and 7.2. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the fact that the petitioner has filed a review application before the DRT-II, seeking review of the order dated 15.07.2017, on which notice was issued on 17.08.2017, returnabl...
Veena Mahajan vs.the Registrar, Office of the Registrar of Cooperative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~10 to 12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5942/2013 VEENA MAHAJAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Mr. Alok Kumar and Mr. Ranjith Nain, Advocates versus THE REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocates for R-1/RCS. Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate for R-2/Society. Mr. Sunil Sabharwal, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sabharwal, Advocate for R-3/DCHFL Ltd. + W.P.(C) 8094/2013 MANU CHOPRA AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Mr. Alok Kumar and Mr. Ranjith Nain, Advocates versus THE REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocates for R-1/RCS. Mr. Dilip Singh, Advocate for R-2/Society. Mr. Sunil Sabharwal, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sabharwal, Advocate for R-3/DCHFL Ltd. W.P.(C) 5942/2013, 8094/2013 and 2737/2014 Page 1 of 8 + W.P.(C) 2737/2014 1. DR. V.M. ...
Dynamic Advertising and Research Team Pvt. Vs.whitefox India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 347/2017 DYNAMIC ADVERTISING AND RESEARCH TEAM PVT. ........ Petitioner WHITEFOX INDIA & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS. Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nikita Choukse and Ms. Rijnta Mohanty, Advs. Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Mr. Hiresh Choudhary and Mr. B. R. Thali, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Ajit Warrier and Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Advs. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1109.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) I.A. 10492/2017 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 347/2017 1. By this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 347/2017 Page 1 of 4 petitioner seeks an injunction against respondent No.2 from releasing any money lying with Respondent No.2 for the sale of tickets of ...
Padam Singh & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2256/2017 PADAM SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Badri Dass, Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Adv. along with petitioners in person. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for State with SI Prakash, P.S. Kalkaji. Mr.Dhananjai Jain, Adv. for R-2 with Mr.Vipul Jain, Director of Respondent No.2/Complainant, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1109.2017 Mr.Vipul Jain, Director of Respondent No.2, appears in person. He is duly identified by the IO SI Prakash. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.485/2013, registered on 24.10.2013 against them with Police Station Kalkaji, South East District, Delhi, under Section 4IPC, on the complaint of respondent No.2. Status report has been h...
Sushil Kumar Jolly vs.chola Mandlam Investment and Finance Company Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8029/2017 and CM Nos. 33092/2017 and 33093/2017 SUSHIL KUMAR JOLLY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Nikhil Malhotra and Mr Vinod Malhotra, Advs. along with petitioner in person. versus CHOLA MANDLAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS AND ORS. Through: Mr Pallav Saxena and Ms Shweta Kapoor, Advs for respondent No.1 Mr Ashish Aggarwal, Adv for respondent Nos. 2,3,4 and 6 along with respondents 2,3 and 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % 1. ORDER1109.2017 The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 17.08.2017, passed by the learned DRAT in Miscellaneous Appeal No.125/2017 filed by him against an order dated 03.03.2017, passed by the DRT-I in SA No.311/2016 granting him a period of 30 days to vacate the first floor of property bearing No.F-1082, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi and handover the vacant peaceful possession thereof to the respondent No.1, by 01.04.2017. ...
M/S Eta Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs.employees Provident Fund Office
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~17 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9052/2015 Date of Decision:11. h September, 2017 M/S ETA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sarsar Raza and Mr.Abuzar Farooque, Advs. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE ..... Respondent versus Through: Mr.Keshav Mohan and Mr.Piyush Choudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in terms of directions dated 25.07.2017, 50% of the amount in terms of impugned order dated 08.10.2014 of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II has been deposited with the Registrar General, of this Court and the report of the Registry indicates that a sum of Rs.16,16,654/- has been so deposited by the petitioner in an FDR.2. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent that no counter affidavit is sought to be filed to the petition.3. Arguments have been addressed on behalf of either side qua the petition vide which the petitioner seeks the setting asid...
Sardar Mohammad vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 11, 2017 W.P.(C) 7614/2016 & CM3133516 SARDAR MOHAMMAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ram Kumar, Mr. K.K. Nangia and Mr. R.B. Sisodia, Advocates Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Ridhi, Advocate for respondent-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Learned counsel for respondents-L&B/LAC and DDA seek liberty to place on record their respective counter affidavits. Liberty granted. Both the counter affidavits are taken on record with consent of counsel for petitioner.2. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the 1/3rd share of the suit lands i.e. Khasra Nos. 454, 453, 459, 460, 461, 462 situated in the revenue estate of Village Sayoor Pur, District-South, New Delhi is free from acquisition by reason of Section...
Praveen Arora & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2613/2017 PRAVEEN ARORA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.S.S. Bagga, Advocate along with petitioner no.1 in person. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for the State along with IO SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Rani Bagh, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1109.2017 Crl.M.A. 14966/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2613/2017 1.2. 3. Notice. Learned ASC, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She appears in person and accepts the notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Sandeep Kumar. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of W.P. (Crl.) No 2613/2017 Page 1 of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »