Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh & Ors vs.state Delhi Admin & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~11, 18 to 20 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 09.2017 CRL.M.C. 2199/2017 SHRI JASRAJ @ RAJAN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with ASI Sudesh, P.S. Jafarpur Kalan, Delhi and ASI Veena Sharma, DIU/SWD, Delhi Mr. Charanjit Sharma, for respondents along with R-2 and R-3 in person. W.P.(CRL) 1613/2017 RAKESH & ORS Through: Mr. Charanjit Sharma, Advocate along with petitioners in person. ........ Petitioners versus STATE DELHI ADMIN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with W/SI Manju, CAW/Cell, Dwarka, Delhi. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CRL. M.C21992017, W.P. (CRL). No.1613 /2017, W.P. (CRL). No.1616 /2017 & W.P. (CRL) 1637/2017 Page 1 of 6 + + W.P.(CRL) 1616/2017 RA...
Shyam Sunder Ahuja vs.shushil Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h September, 2017 RC.REV. 312/2017, CM No.24292/2017 (for stay) & CM No.24294/2017 (for condonation of 106 days delay in re-filing) SHYAM SUNDER AHUJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Prateek Versus Kohli, Advs. SHUSHIL KUMAR Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 23rd December, 2016 in RC/ARC No.172/2016 of the Court of Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller (Shahdara), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from shop No.1A in property No.1712 forming part of Plot No.15 in Khasra No.1309/1049/638 in village Chandrawali @ Shahdara in abadi of Ram...
Jhunde Lal vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:11. h September, 2017 + CRL.A. 1641/2014 & CRL.M.(Bail) No.1514/2017 JHUNDE LAL Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. ..... Appellant Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP alongwith Insp. Pawan Sharma, PS Nihal Vihar. + CRL.A. 1106/2014 NAND RAM @ NAND LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mahipal Singh, Advocate. STATE Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP alongwith Insp. Pawan Sharma, PS Nihal Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CRL. A. No.1641/2014 & CRL. A. No.1106/2014 Page 1 of 33 G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. At the outset, we may note that when the application seeking regular bail of the appellant Jhunde Lal was taken up for hearing, both the counsels agreed that the appeal itself may be disposed of. With the consent of the parties, we have called for the appeal filed by the appellant Nand Ram @ Nand Lal pending before the Sing...
National Highways Authority of India vs.gayatri Jhansi Roadways Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~52 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2017 ARB.A. 1/2017, I.A. Nos.8086/2017 (stay) & 9441/2017 (for waiver of cost) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Appellant versus GAYATRI JHANSI ROADWAYS LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Nitendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Ashish Singh and Mr. Abhishek Raj, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Angad Mehta and Mr. Samaksh Goyal, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1109.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) ARB.A. 1/2017, I.A. Nos.8086/2017 (stay) & 9441/2017 (for waiver of cost) 1. The appellant by the present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugns order of the Arbitral Tribunal dated 27.02.2017 fixing the fee schedule. A d...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.raju Chettri & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 730/2016 Decided on:11. h September, 2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates versus RAJU CHETTRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Mr. Ritik Malik and Mr.D. Pal, Advocates + MAC.APP. 734/2016 RAJU CHETTRI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Mr. Ritik Malik and Mr.D. Pal, Advocates versus M/S CHHAVI TOURISTS PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parasher and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) MACA73016 & 7Page 1 of 4 1. Raju Chettri, appellant in MACA7342016 (claimant), suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 11.06.2009 at about 03.45 a.m. statedly due to the negligent driving of a Tata Indica car bearing registration no.UP-16T-2542 resulting in it colliding against a tru...
Kiran Nadar vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h September, 2017 TEST. CASE262016 KIRAN NADAR ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. Represented by: Mr. Parag Maini, Advocate versus Represented by: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj and Ms. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Aakanksha Nehra, Advocates 1. By the present petition, the petitioner seeks grant of probate/Letters of Administration on the basis of the Will in relation to the estate of Late Smt. Prem Mohini Tandan alias Mohini Tandan in favour of the petitioner and respondent Nos. 2 to 6 2. Briefly stated, the deceased, Smt. Prem Mohini Tandan alias Mohini Tandan, died on 25th December, 2015. The deceased is survived by following class-I heirs namely her daughter Kiran Nadar (petitioner), son Gokul Tandan (respondent No.2), daughter-in-law Ritu Tandan (respondent No.3), granddaughter Sagarika Tandan (respondent No.4), grandson Zai Tandan (respondent No.5) and granddaughter Roshni Nadar (respon...
Anil Kumar Garg & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 09.2017 W.P.(CRL) 2159/2017 ANIL KUMAR GARG & ORS Through Mr.Sushil with Mr.Rachit Batra, Adv. with petitioners No.1 and 2 in person. Shukla, ........ Petitioners Adv. STATE & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ashish Negi, Adv. for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State with W/ASI Krishna, P.S. Vikas Puri. Mr.Himanshu Kapoor, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. Respondent No.2 appears in person. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO W/ASI Krishna. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0409/2016, registered on 20.05.2016 against them with Police Station Vikas Puri, West District, Delhi, under Sections 498/406/377/354/354(A...
Manti Devi & Anr. Vs.mohd. Ajam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~R-183 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 121/2010 MANTI DEVI & ANR. .... Appellants Through: Mr. D.B. Yadav, Adv. versus MOHD. AJAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Jagdish Kumar was driving a motor vehicle described as TATA407Tempo bearing registration No.DL1G5143on 09.10.2007 on road towards Burari from the side of Wazirabad, when at about 4.15 a.m., it came to be involved in a collision against truck bearing registration No.DL1E9643 and as a result of injuries suffered in the consequence he died. Accident claim case (petition No.373/2007) was instituted by his parents, now the appellants, on 28.11.2007 MAC Appeal No.121/2010 Page 1 of 3 seeking compensation impleading, amongst others, the driver, owner and insurer of the two vehicles, invoking Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, attributing negligence on the part of driving of tru...
Vijay Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 201/2017 Date of Judgment:11. h September, 2017 VIJAY KUMAR Through: Mr. J.K. Sharma, Mr. Anuj Kumar & Mr. ..... Appellant CORAM: STATE Atul Bansal, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the judgment dated 15.11.2016 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC). Challenge is also led to the order on sentence dated 26.11.2016 by which the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in the default, to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months.2. The case of the prosecution as noticed by the Trial Court reads as under:-"1. The case of the pr...
Union of India vs.shri Sat Pal Budhiraja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~19. * + % W.P.(C) 3113/2017 & C.M. Nos.13580-13582/2017 UNION OF INDIA Date of Decision:11. 09.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Bharathi Raju, Advocate. versus SHRI SAT PAL BUDHIRAJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana & Mr. Deepak Verma, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length.2. The petitioner UOI has assailed the order dated 20.12.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.3646/2013. The Tribunal by the impugned order has directed the petitioner to promote the respondent applicant to the post of Under Secretary (US) on ad-hoc basis w.e.f. 30.10.2012 and grant him all consequential benefits.3.4. The background in which the disputes arose may now be noted. The respondent joined the Central Secretariat Service (CSS) as LDC W.P.(C) 3113/2017 Page 1 of 10 on 20.11.1975. He go...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »