Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Roop Ram & Anr. Vs.state of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~13 * + 1.2. 3.4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3390/2017 ROOP RAM & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Lave Kr. Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Saket Gogia, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Jaichand, P.S. Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi. Mr. Kuldeep Rai, Advocate for R-3 along with respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1209.2017 % Respondent No.3 is present in court. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Jaichand. The petitioners have approached this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.32/2013, registered on 29.01.2013 against them with Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, North West District, Delhi, under Sections 354/5IPC on the complaint of respondent No.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over certified copies of orders passed in c...
Indira Devi vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 + CRL.L.P. 526/2017 INDIRA DEVI Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate for respondent No.2 and 3 Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The present leave to appeal has been instituted by the wife of the 1. deceased (who was employed as a Constable with the Delhi Police) under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) challenging the judgment dated 15.10.2014 passed by the learned Trial Court, arising out of FIR No.149/2009, whereby all the three respondents herein stand acquitted for the charges framed against them.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the learned Trial Cour...
National Human Rights Commission vs.central Information Commission & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 390/2015 NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Shobha and Ms Joyshree Barman, Advocates. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Feblin Mathew, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1209.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter 'NHRC') has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the order dated 09.12.2014 (hereafter 'the impugned order') passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC).2. By the impugned order, the CIC had disposed of the second appeal preferred by respondent no.2 under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter 'the Act') by directing the NHRC to provide a complete and categorical information to respondent no.2, as requested in his application filed under the Act.3. Respondent no.2 had filed an application on 27.02.2014, inter alia, seeking the following information: W.P.(C) 390/2015 ...
Premanand vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5138/2016 Date of decision:12. h September, 2017 PREMANAND ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K.P.S. Dalal and Mr. Ranjit Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Prasanta Varma, Senior Government Counsel with SI Nagendra Kumar from CRPF. Mr. Vivek Kumar, DC, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Premanand was appointed as a Constable (Cook) in the Central Reserve Police Force on 6th May, 1981.2. After rendering about 34 years of service, the petitioner retired on 31st October, 2016.3. During this service career, the petitioner did earn any promotion, albeit was granted financial upgradations under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP Scheme, for short) and Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP Scheme, for short). W.P. (C) 5138/2016 Page 1 of 4 4. The question raised in the present writ petition is whether financial ...
Sushila Devi vs.state and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h September, 2017 CM(M) No.985/2017 SUSHILA DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Idris Khan, Adv. for Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Saifi, Adv. STATE AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CMs No.32990/2017 & 32991/2017 (both for exemption) Versus [ Through: Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) No.985/2017 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order (dated 29th July, 2016 of Administrative Civil Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi) of dismissal of the Execution Petition being Ex. No.07/2015 filed by the petitioner for execution of an order dated 14th November, 2014 in Succession Case No.68/2013 directing issuance of Succession Certificate to the petitioner with respect to the debts and securities of her deceased son Satish Kumar Yadav.4. The main counsel for the petitioner has no...
Chhaya Devi & Anr vs.rukmini Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~54 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:11. 09.2017 CS(OS) 285/2017 CHHAYA DEVI & ANR versus RUKMINI DEVI & ORS Through Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendants For the Plaintiff : For the Defendant : Mr. Parag Tripathi and Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Ankur Goel, Mr. Jaideep Singh and Mr. Piyush Singh, Advocates Mr. Vidit Gupta, Advocate with Ms. Harleen Singh and Mr. Prakash Pandey, Advocates for D-1, 11, 12, 14, 16 & 17 Mr. Avinash Trivedi and Ms. Ritika Trivedi, Advocates for D- 2 to D-10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1109.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) I.A. 7854/2017 (filed by plaintiffs under Order VI Rule 17 CPC) Issue notice. ========================================================== Page 1 of 18 I.A. 9618/2017 in CS(OS) 285/2017 Notice is accepted by the learned counsel for the defendants who prays for time to file reply. Let reply be filed within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be fil...
Raju Chettri vs.m/s Chhavi Tourists Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 730/2016 Decided on:11. h September, 2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates versus RAJU CHETTRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Mr. Ritik Malik and Mr.D. Pal, Advocates + MAC.APP. 734/2016 RAJU CHETTRI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Mr. Ritik Malik and Mr.D. Pal, Advocates versus M/S CHHAVI TOURISTS PVT LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parasher and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) MACA73016 & 7Page 1 of 4 1. Raju Chettri, appellant in MACA7342016 (claimant), suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 11.06.2009 at about 03.45 a.m. statedly due to the negligent driving of a Tata Indica car bearing registration no.UP-16T-2542 resulting in it colliding against a tru...
Mohd. Aslam & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 28, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: September 11, 2017 CRL.A. 282/2002 MOHD. ASLAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.S.P.Singh Chaudhari, Mr.Y.R.Sharma, Advocates with Appellants in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Jitender, PS Model Town CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 The appellants Mohd.Aslam, Mohd.Arif, Mohd.Ashraf & Smt.Parveen have preferred the instant appeal challenging the judgment dated 13th March, 2002 and order on sentence dated 14th March, 2002 passed in Sessions Case No.246/1996 whereby they have been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Sections 304-B/498-A/34 IPC and sentenced as under: (i) U/S304B/34 IPC to undergo RI for seven years. (ii) U/S498A/34 IPC to undergo RI for three years with fine of 5000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for six months. Both the sente...
Shri Jasraj @ Rajan & Ors vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~11, 18 to 20 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 09.2017 CRL.M.C. 2199/2017 SHRI JASRAJ @ RAJAN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with ASI Sudesh, P.S. Jafarpur Kalan, Delhi and ASI Veena Sharma, DIU/SWD, Delhi Mr. Charanjit Sharma, for respondents along with R-2 and R-3 in person. W.P.(CRL) 1613/2017 RAKESH & ORS Through: Mr. Charanjit Sharma, Advocate along with petitioners in person. ........ Petitioners versus STATE DELHI ADMIN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with W/SI Manju, CAW/Cell, Dwarka, Delhi. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CRL. M.C21992017, W.P. (CRL). No.1613 /2017, W.P. (CRL). No.1616 /2017 & W.P. (CRL) 1637/2017 Page 1 of 6 + + W.P.(CRL) 1616/2017 RA...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.kusum & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-11-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 281/2015 and CM APPL. 5340/2015 (stay), CM APPL. 24117/2016 (cross objections) NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA versus KUSUM & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Jitender Singh, 44 years old, employed with Delhi Police, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 27.09.2013 due to negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DL- 3CAZ-0837, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer) and died in the consequence. The first to fifth respondents (collectively the claimants), being his wife and other members of the family dependant on him, instituted accident claim case (MAC Petition No.10/2014) on 09.01.2014 seeking compensation. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 03.01.2015, accepted the ca...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »