Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Babu Gupta vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~12, 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 + W.P. (C.) 1217/2017 RAKESH BABU GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1449/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates KAUSHAL KISHORE SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Two petitioners claim to be vending at Janpath Lane, Bank of Baroda, near LIC, New Delhi; and Janpath Lane, Bank of Baroda, near Mini Market, New Delhi respectively. The petitioners have filed the present petitions under Article 226 ...
Sunita & Ors. Vs.rajkumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~R-187A & 188 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL NO.152/2010 RAJESH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus RAJKUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Harsh Lata for Ms. Shantha + MAC APPEAL NO.158/2010 Devi Raman, Adv. for R-2 SUNITA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus RAJKUMAR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Harsh Lata for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The claimants in two connected claim cases (suit nos.199/2009 and 198/2009) are constrained to be in appeal for the second time before this court, their claim cases invoking Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 having been dismissed, once again, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), this time by a common MAC A No.152/2010 & 158/2010 Page 1 of 4 judgment dated 21.11.2009, dismissal of the said cases by earlier judgment dated 22.08...
Bunty vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BUNTY STATE CORAM: Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 CRL. A. No.1644/2013 Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) filed against the judgment dated 08.08.2013 passed by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Case No.79/2012, arising out of FIR No.120/2012, Police Station Mahendra Park, whereby the Trial Court has convicted the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC). Challenge is also laid to the order on sentence dated 19.08.2013, by virtue of which the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine to the tune of Rs. 20,000/- f...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sasmita Sahu & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h September, 2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant $~13 * % + MAC.APP. 496/2014 versus SASMITA SAHU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.23,89,100/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 4.2. The accident dated 21st June, 2013 resulted in the death of Hemant Kumar Das. The deceased was aged 28 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, son and parents, who filed the application for compensation. The deceased was in private service earning Rs.15,000/- per month. However, the Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.9,386/-, added 50% towards future prospects, deducted 1/4th towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 17 to compute the loss of depe...
Harpreet Kaur & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~32 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 09.2017 W.P.(CRL) 2617/2017 HARPREET KAUR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sikandar Khan, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State with SI Umesh Yadav, PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 15066/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2617/2017 1.2. 3. Notice. Learned ASC, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She appears in person and accepts notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Umesh Yadav. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for W.P. (Crl.) No.2617/2017...
Rahul @ Bhuri vs.state, Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:2. d August, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on:12. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 1702/2014 RAJ KUMAR @ LALA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sheikh Israr Ahmad, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CRL.A. 158/2015 RAHUL @ BHURI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Mr. Ambar Tewari, Mr. Hemant Gulati and Ms. Anshika Sethi, Advocates versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.1. Both the appeals arising out of a common judgment have been argued together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Present appeals have been instituted under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the judgment dated 10.11.2014 and order on sentence dated 13.11.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Trial Court) in Sessions Cas...
Ram Prakash Gupta vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~21 * + W.P.(C) 8070/2017 % Date of Judgment :12. h September, 2017 RAM PRAKASH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM.APPL No.33209/2017(Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8070/2017 3. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following prayers: a. admit the writ petition against the respondents; b. direct the NDMC to allow the petitioner to carry on his business fruit vender(or of any permissible items) from a suitably fixed site near gate no.2, Palika Bazar or to some other workable place in vicin...
Devender @ Monu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 + CRL.A. 762/2013 DEVENDER @ MONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Andley, Advocate. STATE Versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. It is reflected from the order dated 07.09.2017 passed by this Court that Mr. Jitender Sethi, Advocate for the appellant was only engaged for arguing the bail application and had no instructions to appear in the appeal. In the interest of justice, Mr. Anurag Andley has been appointed as amicus curiae in the present matter and the time was given to prepare the case for the final disposal of the appeal.2. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) assailing the judgment dated 07.12.2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.1arising...
Verizon Communication India Pvt. Ltd vs.assistant Commissioner, Servic ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.11569/2016 Reserved on: August 28, 2017 Date of decision: September 12, 2017 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD. ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, DELHI III, DIVISION-XIV & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. + WITH W.P. (C) No.11572/2016 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, DELHI III, DIVISION-XIV & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate WITH W.P. (C) Nos. 11569/2016, 11572/2016, 11575/2016 & 11577/2016 Page 1 of 29 + W.P. (C) No.11575/2016 & CM No.45598/2016 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD ...Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. A...
Leo Multicuisine Pvt. Ltd. Vs.moods Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 09.2017 ARB.P. 332/2017 LEO MULTICUISINE PVT. LTD. MOODS HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner :Mr. A. K. Pandey, Advocate : Mr. Aman Yadav, Advocate For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking appointment of an arbitrator.2. On 01.11.2010 a franchise agreement was entered into between the parties. During the performance of the said agreement disputes between Page 1 of 3 3. ARB. PET. 332/2017 the parties arose and leading to the petitioner invoking Arbitration Clause.4. The Arbitration Clause under the heading Settlement of Disputes as contained in the franchise agreement dated 01.11.2010 reads as under:-"N. Settlement of D...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »