Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Verizon Communication India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.assistant Commissioner, Servi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.11569/2016 Reserved on: August 28, 2017 Date of decision: September 12, 2017 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD. ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, DELHI III, DIVISION-XIV & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. + WITH W.P. (C) No.11572/2016 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, DELHI III, DIVISION-XIV & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate WITH W.P. (C) Nos. 11569/2016, 11572/2016, 11575/2016 & 11577/2016 Page 1 of 29 + W.P. (C) No.11575/2016 & CM No.45598/2016 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD ...Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. A...
Suman Chatterjee vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September , 2017 TEST.CAS. 9/2010 SUMAN CHATTERJEE ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, Adv. * % + versus THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC with Mr. Sachin Saini, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Adv. for R Mr. Puneet Agarwal, Dalveer Kaur, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) IA100022017 (u/O XVIII R. 4 CPC by R-2) 1. Notice. Learned counsels for the plaintiff and respondent No.3, the contesting parties accept notice. Learned counsels state that they do not wish to file reply to the application and have addressed their respective arguments.2. By the present application the respondent No.2 states that since the interest of petitioner and respondent No.3 is in propounding the Will because both of them got the property in equal shares; the only difference being TEST.CAS. 9/2010 Page 1 of 4 respondent No.3 propounds the registered ...
Vikas Jain & Anr vs.the Registrar Cooperative Societies, Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8104/2017 & C.M. No.33349-51/2017 VIKAS JAIN & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Advocate. versus THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC with Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Advocate for R-1/RCS. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER1209.2017 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition unconditionally.2. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J DEEPA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER12 2017 ap...
Surajmukhi & Anr vs.ismail & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 140/2017 SURAJMUKHI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus ISMAIL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Navneet Kumar and Mr. Vikas Bhadana, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The motor vehicular accident that occurred on 05.04.2014 resulting in death of Akhil Kumar was the subject matter of the accident claim case (suit no.261/2014) instituted by the appellants (claimants / parents) on which the impugned judgment dated 21.09.2016 was passed, whereby compensation in the sum of Rs.7,93,600/- was awarded and liability was fastened on the third respondent (insurer of the offending vehicle).2. The appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation is pressed by the learned counsel for the claimants on their behalf only to submit that the non-pecuniary damages under the heads of loss of love and MAC A No.140/2017 Page 1 of 2 affection (Rs....
Harpreet Kaur and Anr vs.m/s Fullerton India Credit Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7326/2017 % 1. HARPREET KAUR AND ANR versus Through: None ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Through: None M/S FULLERTON INDIA CREDIT CO. LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ORDER1209.2017 The matter was passed over on the first call. Even on the second call, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to file copies of the orders passed by the DRAT subsequent to 10.07.2017. The said orders have also not been filed. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.2. The writ petition is dismissed in default as also for non-prosecution. HIMA KOHLI, J DEEPA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER12 2017/pk...
Verizon Communication India Pvt. Ltd vs.commissioner, Service Tax Comm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.11569/2016 Reserved on: August 28, 2017 Date of decision: September 12, 2017 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD. ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, DELHI III, DIVISION-XIV & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. + WITH W.P. (C) No.11572/2016 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Satish Kumar, Advocate. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, DELHI III, DIVISION-XIV & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate WITH W.P. (C) Nos. 11569/2016, 11572/2016, 11575/2016 & 11577/2016 Page 1 of 29 + W.P. (C) No.11575/2016 & CM No.45598/2016 VERIZON COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD ...Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. A...
Vinod Kumar & Ors vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3702/2017 VINOD KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Pravesh Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for State with ASI Vinod Kumar Tyagi, CAW Cell/East, PS Vivek Vihar, Delhi. Ms.Sandhya Singh, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1209.2017 Crl.M.A. 15062/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3702/2017 1. Notice. Learned APP, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She appears in person and accepts notice. She is duly identified by IO ASI Vinod Kumar Tyagi. The petitioners have approached this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of She is being represented by her counsel.2. 3. Crl.M.C. ...
Subhash Chaddha vs.puneet Chaddha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 09.2017 EX.P.263/2013 & Ex. Appl. No.685/2013 versus SUBHASH CHADDHA PUNEET CHADDHA Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Decree Holder ..... Judgement Debtor For the Decree Holder For the Judgment Debtors : Mr. Shashank Vachher, Advocate : Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Advocate with Ms. Amita Sachdeva, Adv. for JD-2 to 4 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1209.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The decree holder seeks execution of judgment/decree dated 02.12.2010.2. By judgment/decree dated 02.12.2010 the judgment debtor (now deceased, represented by his wife) had agreed to a decree of eviction being passed against him in respect of portion of the property under his possession in property bearing no.491-492, Second Floor, Double Storey, New Rajender Nagar, New Delhi.3. It is an admitted position that consequent to the said decree on EX.P2632013 Page 1 of 3 31.01.2011, the portion in occupation of the...
Aditi Goel vs.rohit Goel & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 990/2017 ADITI GOEL Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. ........ Petitioner Anshul Duggal, Adv. ROHIT GOEL & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS % CM No.33025/2017 (for exemption) ORDER1209.2017 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 990/2017 & CM No.33024/2017 (for stay) 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 12th July, 2017 in GP No.25/2014 of the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the applications of the petitioner (respondent in the guardian case) (a) for deletion of the respondents No.2&3 Urmila Kumari and Rajendra Prasad, being the grandparents of the minor, as petitioners no.2&3 in the guardianship case (and in which the respondent No.1, being the father of the minor is the petitioner no.1); and, (b) for m...
Sanjeev Kumar vs.sweta Kumari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 163/2017 and C.M. Nos. 33216-18/2017 SANJEEV KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Subhash Chandra and Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: SWETA KUMARI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER1209.2017 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal while reserving the right of the appellant to approach the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi for seeking revival of the petition on payment of arrears of outstanding maintenance, as recorded in the impugned order dated 3.7.2017.2. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications. SEPTEMBER12 2017/ap HIMA KOHLI, J DEEPA SHARMA, J...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »