Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Nct of Delhi vs.monu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. L.P.92/2016 Reserved on:18. h August, 2017 Date of Decision:12. h September, 2017 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Megha Bahl, Advocate for Mr. MONU Avi Singh, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate with Inspr. Rajneesh Sharma, P. S. N. S. Place CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner, by way of this petition, is seeking leave to appeal against the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 30.05.2015 passed by Learned Additional Session Judge-Fast Track Court (North West) Rohini, Delhi in FIR No.270/2011 under Sections 302/3IPC registered at Police Station Subhash Place.2. The case of the prosecution as noticed by the Trial Court is that complainant Sohaib along with his cousin Dulare (son of his mausi) had gone towards Samrat Chowk on 07.07.2011 at about 11:00 p.m. for taking ice-cream. They reached the ice-crea...
Balik Ram vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~9, 10, 11, 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 + W.P. (C.) 930/2017 BHIKKI RAM Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. ........ Petitioner versus Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1181/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates KUNWAR PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1191/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent W.P. (C) No.930/2017 etc. Page 1 of 9 Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates + W.P.(C) 1218/2017 BA...
Air India Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Sales Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: August 31, 2017 Date of decision: September 12, 2017 AIR INDIA LTD. ST.REF. 4/2004 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Vibhor Garg, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Urvi Mohan, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates. WITH ST.REF. 1/2015 AIR INDIA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIAN AIRLINES) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Vibhor Garg, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Urvi Mohan, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates WITH ST.REF. 2/2015 AIR INDIA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIAN AIRLINES) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Vibhor Garg, STR No.4/2004 & connected cases Page 1 of 13 Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, DELHI ... Respondent...
Nitin Jain vs.pallavi Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~57 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) No.996/2017 & CM No.33191/2017 (for stay). NITIN JAIN Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. ........ Petitioner Versus PALLAVI JAIN CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. ..... Respondent % ORDER1209.2017 CM No.33192/2017 and CM No.33193/2017 (both for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) No.996/2017 & CM No.33191/2017 (for stay).3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order (dated 5th August, 2017 in GP No.5872of the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) framing issues in the case and posting the matter for evidence of the respondent (petitioner in the guardianship case) on 1st and 2nd February, 2018.4. On a reading of the petition it could not be understood as to what is the challenge to the order framing the issues.5. The counsel for the petitioner has however drawn attenti...
Faizal Ibrahim vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~69 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2109/2017 & CM92252017 FAIZAL IBRAHIM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr K. Varghese, Mr abin Phukan, Mr V. Shyamohan, Mr Suya Prakash, Mr Harnain KIaur Alag, Mr Gurpreet Hora, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Nivesh Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1209.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that 1. respondent no.2 be directed to release his passport (Passport No.Z2150289). Briefly stated, the relevant facts necessary to address the controversy 2. involved in this petition are as under:-"2.1 The petitioner is a citizen of India and states that he has been a resident of United Arab Emirates (hereafter the UAE) for almost his entire life. The petitioner owns a trading company in Ajman, UAE. It is stated that the said company was established by his father and now the petitioner handles the day-to-day operations of th...
Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd vs.babu Lenka & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~R-189 & 190 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL NO.163/2010 and CM Nos.4802/2010 & 14562/2010 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INS. CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Harsh Lata for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus BABU LENKA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1 & 2 + MAC APPEAL NO.169/2010 and CM49572010 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .... Appellant Through: Ms. Harsh Lata for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus BABU LENKA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhry, Adv. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Pradeep Kumar Lenka, a bachelor, then aged about 26 yrs, son of the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants) suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on MAC A No.163/2010 & 169/2010 Page 1 of 6 28.05.2006 due to the negligent driving of two vehicles, one being Santro Car bearing registration no.DL-3C-AG...
Hemlata & Ors vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. h September, 2017 FAO4922012 HEMLATA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi, Advocate for Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ms.Rashmi Joydeep Mazumdar, Lead Counsel Northern Railways along with Malhotra, Mr.Himanshu Kaushik, Mr.Debojyoti Bhattacharya, Mr. Rohit Dutta, Ms.Momota Bhattacharya, Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocates C. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the impugned order dated 31st August, 2012 whereby their application for compensation has been dismissed by the Railway Claims Tribunal.2. The appellants are the widow, minor son and parents of late Kamal Singh and they filed an application for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal claiming compensation on the ground that Kamal Singh fell down between platform No.3 and 5 of Old Delhi Railway Station on 13th FAO4922012 Page 1 of 15 January, 2011 at...
V S Agriculture Senior Secondary School Thr Its Manager vs.director of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:12. 09.2017 + LPA1922017 V S AGRICULTURE SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL THR ITS MANAGER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nitin Jain, proxy for Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocate. Mr. Hari Prakash, Adv. for Resp-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order of the Single Judge which upheld the decision of the Directorate of Education not to grant approval to the proposed punishment of removal from service.2. The facts are that the respondent employee was working with the appellants school as Laboratory Assistant from 1993. Alleging misconduct, the appellant Management suspended its employee on 31.08.2013. Since the appellant school is aided by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi to the extent of 95% and also under the pro...
M/S. Saraswati Steel & Ors. Vs.nitin Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 142/2016 & CM170072016 Date of decision:12. h September, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sanjiv Bahl, Mr.Alok Singh, Mr.A.Bahl, Advs. with appellant no.2 in person Mr.S.S.Pandey and Mr.H.S.Tiwari, Advs. M/S. SARASWATI STEEL & ORS. NITIN GARG versus Through: Mr.Ashish Kapur, Mr.Anil Garg, Ms.Chavi Luthra, Mr.Jitesh Talwani, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) M/s Saraswati Steel, partnership firm, Rohit Aggarwal and Hari Aggarwal have filed the present intra court appeal impugning the order dated 1st April, 2016, which dismisses their application, IA no.1379/2016 under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code for short), for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 29th September, 2015 in CS(OS) no.2742/2014, Nitin Garg vs. Saraswati Steel & Ors. FAO(OS) 142/2016 Page 1 2. Nitin Garg, who is the respondent before...
Kunwar Pal Singh vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~9, 10, 11, 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 + W.P. (C.) 930/2017 BHIKKI RAM Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. ........ Petitioner versus Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1181/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates KUNWAR PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1191/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent W.P. (C) No.930/2017 etc. Page 1 of 9 Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates + W.P.(C) 1218/2017 BA...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »